Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation After Stroke
35 Hz Versus 50 Hz Frequency Stimulation Effects on Motor Recovery in Older Adults After Stroke. A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
69
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) was conducted to determine the effects of two neuromuscular electrical stimulation protocols with different stimulation frequencies on motor recovery in older adults with spastic hemiparesis after a stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jul 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2019
CompletedApril 12, 2019
April 1, 2019
5.2 years
March 9, 2019
April 9, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in range of motion
A universal goniometer was used to measure the resting angle, active extension and passive extension of the wrist. A special JAMAR finger goniometer was used to evaluate the resting angle and active extension of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers.
The groups were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention.
Change in dynamometric strength
The grip strength was assessed by means of a JAMAR hydraulic hand dynamometer and the pinch strength using the JAMAR hydraulic pinch gauge. Unit of measurement was kgf. Three repetitions were done in both evaluations, taking the highest value and leaving a resting period of 1 minute between them.
The groups were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention.
Change in muscle tone
Hypertonia of the finger and wrist flexors was measured using the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). MAS was used to categorize the severity of muscle tone by judging resistance to passive movement. It is a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ 2, 3, and 4) that ranges from 1 (=no increase in tone) to 4 (=limb rigid in flexion or extension). The assessment was started 5 minutes after laying the subject down in the supine position and using a single passive movement to evaluate each muscle group.
The groups were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention.
Change in functional motor ability
Manual dexterity was assessed by Box and block test.
The groups were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in the mean electromyographic (EMG) amplitude
The groups were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention.
Change in the peak EMG amplitude
The groups were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention.
Change in the antagonist co-activation ratio
The groups were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention.
Change in kinaesthetic sensation
The groups were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention.
Change in activities of daily living
The groups were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Intervention costs
Intervention costs were recorded from the baseline to 12 weeks.
Study Arms (3)
50 Hz NMES group
EXPERIMENTALNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) was applied on wrist and finger extensors for 30 minutes, 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks. The main electrostimulation parameters consisted of low-frequency current, a stimulation frequency of 50 Hz, symmetrical rectangular biphasic wave, and pulse duration of 300 μs.
35 Hz NMES group
EXPERIMENTALNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) was applied on wrist and finger extensors for 30 minutes, 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks. The main electrostimulation parameters consisted of low-frequency current, a stimulation frequency of 35 Hz, symmetrical rectangular biphasic wave, and pulse duration of 300 μs.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONConventional treatment
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 60 years
- Post-stroke spastic hemiparesis
- Mild-moderate hand impairment
- A score ≤ 3 on the modified Ashworth scale for wrist and finger flexors
- Active wrist extension ≥ 5º from the resting position
- Wrist extension response to stimulation
- Post-stroke period \< 18 months
- Clinical stability
- Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥ 23
You may not qualify if:
- Previous hemiparesis due to stroke
- Dermatological reactions with the application of stimulation
- Significant sensory deficits in the affected arm
- Previous musculoskeletal problems of the hand
- Treatment with the botulin toxin
- Anti-spastic medication usage
- Cardiac pacemaker, implanted electronic device, or metal implants in the affected arm
- Complex regional pain syndrome
- Severe aphasia, history of epileptic seizures, psychiatric disorder or important alterations of behavior
- Severe visual impairment
- Any comorbid neurological disease
- Important deformity or obesity that affects the application of the NMES
- Potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmia or another decompensated heart disease
- Systemic infectious process, cancer or another terminal disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Doctor Peset University Hospital
Valencia, 46017, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Trinidad Sentandreu Mañó, PT, PhD
University of Valencia
- STUDY CHAIR
J. Ricardo Salom Terrádez, MD, PhD
Doctor Peset University Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
J. Manuel Tomas, PhD
University of Valencia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2019
First Posted
April 12, 2019
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 12, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04