NCT03911999

Brief Summary

The prostate gland is a clinically important male accessory sex gland and vital for its production of semen. Prostate cancer (PCa) is now ranked 3th in annual incidence of male cancer and ranked 5th for cancer-related death in men in Hong Kong which accounts for about 10.9 deaths per 100,000 persons. Its incidence is rising rapidly, almost tripled in the past 10 years. Fortunately, with the improvement in awareness of the disease and also increasing use of serum prostate specific antigen for early case identification, many patients are diagnosed at an earlier stage. However, unlike other malignancy, PCa is characterized by its slow progression nature. Therefore, some patients with low grade low volume disease might never suffered from PCa related complications or mortality. As a result, recent year, there is an increase use a more conservative approach, active surveillance (AS), for management of early prostate cancer. The principle of AS is selecting patients with low risk of disease and offered them regular monitoring, instead of radical local therapy, unless patient's cancer was noticed to progressing. By using this approach, patients might avoid possible complications related to treatment. Currently, people could use some clinical parameters, imaging and repeated prostate biopsy to assess and monitor the aggressiveness/ progression of PCa. However, these parameters suffered from defects, such as low correlation to the final PCa pathology or not readily repeatable for patients. Therefore, there is a need to identify more easy, safe and repeatable monitoring of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. Exosome is genetic materials secreted by cells and could be measured in various body fluid. There are some studies suggested it is a potential marker for PCa diagnosis and monitoring. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship of urinary exosome and the aggressiveness of prostate cancer.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 3, 2018

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 10, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 11, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 15, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 2, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

April 10, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 31, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • To compare the differences in microRNA expression between non-prostate cancer subjects, pathologically insignificant and significant prostate cancer patients.

    Urine will be collected prior to surgery. The urine sample will then be handled immediately for exosomal RNA extraction (refer to specific methodology). The extracted exosomal RNA would then be stored for next generation sequencing (NGS). Results of the 3 groups will then be compared, with reference to literatures findings. Candidate microRNAs that can differentiate between pathologically significant and insignificant cancer will be selected for Part II study.

    Baseline, one-time point

  • To assess the accuracy of selected microRNAs for the differentiation of patients with pathologically insignificant and significant prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

    Urine will be collected prior to surgery. The urine sample will then be handled immediately for exosomal RNA extraction (refer to specific methodology). The extracted exosomal RNA would then be stored for next generation sequencing (NGS). Results of the 3 groups will then be compared, with reference to literatures findings. Candidate microRNAs that can differentiate betten pathologically significant and insignificant cancer will be selected for Part II study.The preoperative patients and disease parameters, including age, clinical staging, serum PSA level, prostatic biopsy results, MRI findings, together with the prostatectomy pathology will be collected for subsequent data analysis.

    Baseline, one-time point

Study Arms (3)

Non-prostate cancer subjects

No clinical evidence of prostate cancer

Subjects with pathologically insignificant prostate cancer

Insignificant prostate cancers were organ confined with tumor volumes less than 0.5 cc and Gleason score \< 7.

Subjects with pathologically significant prostate cancer

Significant cancers are those with either Gleason score \> 7, evidences of extra-prostatic extension with positive margins, or seminal vesicles / lymph nodes involvement.

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

For non prostate cancer group, there is no specific time limit for urine collection. For prostate cancer group, urine will be collected prior to prostatectomy.

You may qualify if:

  • For non prostate cancer group
  • Male subject with age 45 or above
  • No clinical evidence of PCa, serum PSA \<4 ng/dl and normal digital rectal examination.
  • For prostate cancer group
  • Male subject with age 45 or above
  • Clinically diagnosed to have localized PCa and planned for radical prostatectomy
  • No prior systemic therapy for PCa used, including hormonal or chemotherapy.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of medications usage that can affect serum PSA levels within 6 months of study enrolment.
  • History of active urinary tract infection within 1 month of study enrolment.
  • History of invasive prostate / bladder treatments within 6 months of study enrolment.
  • History of concurrent renal/bladder cancer within 6 months of study enrolment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Strope SA, Andriole GL. Prostate cancer screening: current status and future perspectives. Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Sep;7(9):487-93. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.120.

    PMID: 20818326BACKGROUND
  • Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, Brendler CB. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA. 1994 Feb 2;271(5):368-74.

    PMID: 7506797BACKGROUND
  • Ploussard G, Epstein JI, Montironi R, Carroll PR, Wirth M, Grimm MO, Bjartell AS, Montorsi F, Freedland SJ, Erbersdobler A, van der Kwast TH. The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2011 Aug;60(2):291-303. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 May 17.

    PMID: 21601982BACKGROUND
  • McKiernan J, Donovan MJ, O'Neill V, Bentink S, Noerholm M, Belzer S, Skog J, Kattan MW, Partin A, Andriole G, Brown G, Wei JT, Thompson IM Jr, Carroll P. A Novel Urine Exosome Gene Expression Assay to Predict High-grade Prostate Cancer at Initial Biopsy. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jul 1;2(7):882-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0097.

    PMID: 27032035BACKGROUND
  • Dinh KT, Mahal BA, Ziehr DR, Muralidhar V, Chen YW, Viswanathan VB, Nezolosky MD, Beard CJ, Choueiri TK, Martin NE, Orio PF, Sweeney CJ, Trinh QD, Nguyen PL. Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.015. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

    PMID: 25681290BACKGROUND
  • Chiu PK, Lai FM, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yee CH, Chan ES, Hou SM, Ng CF. Prostate Health Index and %p2PSA Predict Aggressive Prostate Cancer Pathology in Chinese Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2707-14. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5183-6. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

    PMID: 26965697BACKGROUND
  • Schiffer E. Biomarkers for prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2007 Dec;25(6):557-62. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0203-6. Epub 2007 Aug 10.

    PMID: 17690889BACKGROUND
  • Ng CF, Yeung R, Chiu PK, Lam NY, Chow J, Chan B. The role of urine prostate cancer antigen 3 mRNA levels in the diagnosis of prostate cancer among Hong Kong Chinese patients. Hong Kong Med J. 2012 Dec;18(6):459-65.

    PMID: 23223645BACKGROUND
  • Laxman B, Tomlins SA, Mehra R, Morris DS, Wang L, Helgeson BE, Shah RB, Rubin MA, Wei JT, Chinnaiyan AM. Noninvasive detection of TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcripts in the urine of men with prostate cancer. Neoplasia. 2006 Oct;8(10):885-8. doi: 10.1593/neo.06625.

    PMID: 17059688BACKGROUND
  • Ren S, Peng Z, Mao JH, Yu Y, Yin C, Gao X, Cui Z, Zhang J, Yi K, Xu W, Chen C, Wang F, Guo X, Lu J, Yang J, Wei M, Tian Z, Guan Y, Tang L, Xu C, Wang L, Gao X, Tian W, Wang J, Yang H, Wang J, Sun Y. RNA-seq analysis of prostate cancer in the Chinese population identifies recurrent gene fusions, cancer-associated long noncoding RNAs and aberrant alternative splicings. Cell Res. 2012 May;22(5):806-21. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.30. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

    PMID: 22349460BACKGROUND
  • Gudmundsson J, Sulem P, Gudbjartsson DF, Masson G, Agnarsson BA, Benediktsdottir KR, Sigurdsson A, Magnusson OT, Gudjonsson SA, Magnusdottir DN, Johannsdottir H, Helgadottir HT, Stacey SN, Jonasdottir A, Olafsdottir SB, Thorleifsson G, Jonasson JG, Tryggvadottir L, Navarrete S, Fuertes F, Helfand BT, Hu Q, Csiki IE, Mates IN, Jinga V, Aben KK, van Oort IM, Vermeulen SH, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Ng CF, Chiu PK, Lau KM, Ng MC, Gulcher JR, Kong A, Catalona WJ, Mayordomo JI, Einarsson GV, Barkardottir RB, Jonsson E, Mates D, Neal DE, Kiemeney LA, Thorsteinsdottir U, Rafnar T, Stefansson K. A study based on whole-genome sequencing yields a rare variant at 8q24 associated with prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2012 Dec;44(12):1326-9. doi: 10.1038/ng.2437. Epub 2012 Oct 28.

    PMID: 23104005BACKGROUND
  • Wang G, Chan ES, Kwan BC, Li PK, Yip SK, Szeto CC, Ng CF. Expression of microRNAs in the urine of patients with bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2012 Jun;10(2):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

    PMID: 22386240BACKGROUND
  • Kumar B, Lupold SE. MicroRNA expression and function in prostate cancer: a review of current knowledge and opportunities for discovery. Asian J Androl. 2016 Jul-Aug;18(4):559-67. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.177839.

    PMID: 27056344BACKGROUND
  • Endzelins E, Melne V, Kalnina Z, Lietuvietis V, Riekstina U, Llorente A, Line A. Diagnostic, prognostic and predictive value of cell-free miRNAs in prostate cancer: a systematic review. Mol Cancer. 2016 May 18;15(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12943-016-0523-5.

    PMID: 27189160BACKGROUND
  • Yu S, Wang X, Ng CF, Chen S, Chan FL. ERRgamma suppresses cell proliferation and tumor growth of androgen-sensitive and androgen-insensitive prostate cancer cells and its implication as a therapeutic target for prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2007 May 15;67(10):4904-14. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3855.

    PMID: 17510420BACKGROUND
  • Tsoi TH, Chan CF, Chan WL, Chiu KF, Wong WT, Ng CF, Wong KL. Urinary Polyamines: A Pilot Study on Their Roles as Prostate Cancer Detection Biomarkers. PLoS One. 2016 Sep 6;11(9):e0162217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162217. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27598335BACKGROUND
  • Zhang DZ, Lau KM, Chan ES, Wang G, Szeto CC, Wong K, Choy RK, Ng CF. Cell-free urinary microRNA-99a and microRNA-125b are diagnostic markers for the non-invasive screening of bladder cancer. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 11;9(7):e100793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100793. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25014919BACKGROUND
  • Leung YK, Chan QK, Ng CF, Ma FM, Tse HM, To KF, Maranchie J, Ho SM, Lau KM. Hsa-miRNA-765 as a key mediator for inhibiting growth, migration and invasion in fulvestrant-treated prostate cancer. PLoS One. 2014 May 16;9(5):e98037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098037. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 24837491BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Chi Fai Ng, MD

    Chinese University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2019

First Posted

April 11, 2019

Study Start

May 3, 2018

Primary Completion

November 15, 2020

Study Completion

December 31, 2020

Last Updated

June 2, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Locations