Development and Piloting of a Just-in-Time, Personalized HIV Prevention Intervention for Youth Experiencing Homelessness and Unstable Housing
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is develop and pilot test a personalized HIV intervention with youth experiencing homelessness by creating and field testing prevention messages that address real-time predictors (e.g., sexual urge, use to use drugs, and substance use) of HIV risk behaviors,to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and to evaluate the intervention outcome effects on HIV risk behaviors (e.g., condomless sex, number of sexual partners, pre-exposure prophylaxis(PrEP) awareness, substance use during sex,Intravenous(IV)drug use)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2019
CompletedOctober 17, 2019
October 1, 2019
2 months
April 8, 2019
October 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Feasibility as assessed by number recruited
Number recruited is number of eligible youth minus number who refuse to participate.
baseline
Feasibility as assessed by number of participants who complete the study
6 weeks
Feasibility as assessed by number of staff hours required
6 weeks
Feasibility as assessed by number of participants who damage or lose phones
6 weeks
Acceptability as assessed by score on the System Usability Scale (SUS)
The System Usability Scale (SUS) consists of 10 items on a 5-point (0-4) Likert scale and is designed to assess acceptability of a product. Overall score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
6 weeks
Acceptability as assessed by score on the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)
The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) consists of 23 items on a 5-point (1-5) scale is designed to score apps on the criteria of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality (sub-scales). Total score is determined by calculating the mean of each sub-scale and an overall mean score. High mean scores indicate a higher quality app.
6 weeks
Number of participants who complete greater than 80% of the Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMAs)
6 weeks
Number of participants who read greater than 80% of Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention (JITAI) messages
6 weeks
Effect on HIV risk behaviors as assessed by number of participants who use condoms
6 weeks
Effect on HIV risk as assessed by number who use substances before sex
6 weeks
Effect on HIV risk as assessed by number of participants who have pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) interest
6 weeks
Effect on HIV risk as assessed by number of participants who undergo HIV or sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing
6 weeks
Effect on HIV risk as assessed by number of sexual partners
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
HIV
ACTIVE COMPARATORGeneral Health
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
At the completion of each EMA, participants in the intervention group (n=50) will receive messages that address:1) unsafe sexual behaviors, 2) alcohol/drug use, 3) PrEP interest, and 4) HIV testing. In addition, participants will have access to a button in the app that will link them to resources when/if they are the victim of sexual assault. Finally, intervention arm youth will be asked to set a behavioral goal related to HIV prevention during this session. Those goals will include increasing condom use, PrEP use, non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) use, reducing number of sexual partners, not having sex with using drugs or drinking alcohol, avoiding IV drug use, getting testing for HIV, and testing and treating sexually transmitted infections (STIs) as needed
Participants in the attention control condition (n=50) will answer the same EMA items as the Intervention group. However, the intervention messages will contain content related to nutrition, physical activity, sleep hygiene, and tobacco use. Finally, control arm youth will be asked to set a behavioral goal related to general health during this session.Those goals will include getting 7+ hours of sleep, eating \>= 5 servings of fruits or vegetables, not using tobacco products, exercising at least 60 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English speaking
- HIV high risk: IV drug user or sexually active youth (sex in the past 3 months) who reports at least one of the following: condomless sex, concurrent sexual partners within 2 weeks,sex with a partner of unknown HIV status, or a bacterial STI in the last 6 months.
- Homelessness: staying on the streets or in a place not meant for human habitation, a shelter,hotel/motel, or some place they cannot stay for more than 30 days
You may not qualify if:
- Below 6th grade reading level:determined by the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine Short Form (REALM)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (1)
Santa Maria D, Padhye N, Businelle M, Yang Y, Jones J, Sims A, Lightfoot M. Efficacy of a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention to Promote HIV Risk Reduction Behaviors Among Young Adults Experiencing Homelessness: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 6;23(7):e26704. doi: 10.2196/26704.
PMID: 34255679DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Diane Santa Maria, DrPH
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2019
First Posted
April 10, 2019
Study Start
May 20, 2019
Primary Completion
August 1, 2019
Study Completion
August 1, 2019
Last Updated
October 17, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share