Care Pathway for Sub-acute Hip Rehabilitation
Integrated Care Pathway for Hip Fractures in a Subacute Rehabilitation Setting
2 other identifiers
interventional
162
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The effectiveness of integrated care pathways for hip fractures in sub-acute rehabilitation settings is not known. The study objective was to assess if a hip fracture integrated care pathway at a sub-acute rehabilitation facility would result in better functional outcomes, shorter length of stay and fewer institutionalisations. A randomised controlled trial on an integrated care pathway was conducted for hip fracture patients in a sub-acute rehabilitation setting. The study supports the use of integrated care pathways in sub-acute rehabilitation settings to reduce length of stay whilst achieving the same functional gains.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 8, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 14, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 26, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2019
CompletedApril 8, 2019
April 1, 2019
1.8 years
September 16, 2018
April 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (MRFS)
MRFS is a recognised measure of hip fracture patients' functional outcome, calculated with the following formula, using the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores (which scores the degree of independence of a subject from any assistance up to a maximum score of 100)
1 day At discharge
Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (MRFS)
MRFS is a recognised measure of hip fracture patients' functional outcome, calculated with the following formula, using the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores (which scores the degree of independence of a subject from any assistance up to a maximum score of 100)
At 6 months
Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (MRFS)
MRFS is a recognised measure of hip fracture patients' functional outcome, calculated with the following formula, using the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores (which scores the degree of independence of a subject from any assistance up to a maximum score of 100)
At 1 year
Proportions of patients achieving pre-morbid ambulatory status
Pre-morbid ambulatory status is a predictor for post-operative mobility
1 day At discharge
Proportions of patients achieving pre-morbid ambulatory status
Pre-morbid ambulatory status is a predictor for post-operative mobility
At 6 months
Proportions of patients achieving pre-morbid ambulatory status
Pre-morbid ambulatory status is a predictor for post-operative mobility
At 1 year
Length of stay in hospital
Refers to the average number of days that patients spend in hospital
1 day At discharge
Percentage of patients admitted to nursing home
A form of institutional care
Up to 1 year after discharge
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Readmissions to an acute hospital for any reason
up to 1-year post-discharge
Cumulated mortality
1 year
Quality of life scale-Short form 12 quality of life
6 months and 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONUsual care consisted of 2 half hourly therapy sessions per day from Monday to Friday and medical ward rounds 3 times a week. Multidisciplinary rounds were conducted every 2 weeks. Any specific goals or interventions were at the discretion of the managing team.
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALIntervention group had structured assessments and checklists (as part of the integrated care pathway) in addition to usual care.
Interventions
The intervention group had the following as part of the integrated care pathway: 1. Medical assessment on admission for risk factors for falls. 2. A weekly assessment of complications including pain, deep venous thrombosis, anaemia, wounds and pressure ulcers, etc. The Confusion Assessment Method and the Geriatric Depression Scale were utilized. 3. Physiotherapy and occupational therapy guidelines with recommended milestones (set for the full, partial and non-weight bearing groups) 4. Physiotherapy Clinical Outcome Variables Scale (PTCOVS)16 was used by the physiotherapists in the intervention group to assess the baseline mobility, to define outcome goals and to direct treatment plans. 5. A postoperative hip precaution handout (containing information on avoiding hip prosthesis dislocation in patients with total hip replacement or hemiarthroplasty) was given to patients and their caregivers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients admitted to St Luke's Hospital for the purpose of rehabilitation after a new hip fracture.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients were excluded if any of the following criteria were present: (i) Pre-morbid non-ambulatory status, (ii) nursing home residents, (iii) palliative care patients, and (iv) patients previously enlisted for the trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St Luke's Hospital, Singaporelead
- National University of Singaporecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
St Luke's Hospital, Singapore
Singapore, 659674, Singapore
Related Publications (1)
Handoll HH, Cameron ID, Mak JC, Panagoda CE, Finnegan TP. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 12;11(11):CD007125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007125.pub3.
PMID: 34766330DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Tze Pin Ng, FAMS, PhD
National University of Singapore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Single Blind
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Executive Officer, Medical Director, Medical Division
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2018
First Posted
April 8, 2019
Study Start
September 8, 2004
Primary Completion
June 14, 2006
Study Completion
December 26, 2012
Last Updated
April 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share