TENS Efficacy on Acute Back Pain in an Emergency Department Triage
The Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on the Efficacy of Acute Back Pain Within an Emergency Department Triage: A Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) devices produce a gentle electrical stimulation that when applied through pads applied directly to the skin, has a noticeable effect in reducing pain associated with various types of injuries and ailments. Several recent studies have shown efficacy when used for acute pain specific to primary dysmenorrhea, renal colic, lower-extremity pain, and pain associated with spinal cord injury, and was achieved without adverse effects. This study is intended to compare the effects of TENS units on acute back pain on ambulatory patients who are awaiting emergency medical treatment, to uncover if a statistically-significant analgesic effect is noted compared to a placebo device.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 5, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 16, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 16, 2019
CompletedJune 4, 2019
May 1, 2019
1 month
March 30, 2019
May 31, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Decrease in pain using Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)
Enrolled participants will have baseline Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) pain scale scores assessed, consisting of a 0 to 100 unit scale, with instruction to locate their level of pain on the scale of 0 being "No pain at all," 50 being "Moderate Pain," and 100 being "Worst pain imaginable," and will be compared to score on the same scale after treatment.
After 30-minute duration of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Increase in patient satisfaction while awaiting treatment
After 30-minute duration of treatment
Study Arms (2)
Active TENS Group "Group A"
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter all necessary data collection forms are obtained, a pre-VAS score will be obtained. The participant will point to the area of maximum subjective pain, and then four TENS pads will be applied directly around the point of maximal pain that was determined by the patient, located at least 3 centimeters but no more than 6 centimeters from the area in a square or frame-like placement. While the device is off, it will be set at the following settings: The selector switch will be set to 'Milli' or milliamperes, and the frequency dial will be rotated to 100 Hertz. The participant will be instructed to rotate both dials in a clockwise direction if more intensity is desired, or counter-clockwise if less intensity is desired. The participant will wear the device and pads for a 30-minute duration; upon completion, post-VAS scores and a patient satisfaction survey will be obtained.
Placebo TENS Group "Group B"
PLACEBO COMPARATORAfter all necessary data collection forms are obtained, a pre-VAS score will be obtained. The participant will point to the area of maximum subjective pain, and then four TENS pads will be applied directly around the point of maximal pain that was determined by the patient, located at least 3 centimeters but no more than 6 centimeters from the area in a square or frame-like placement. However, no electrical stimulation will be provided. The participant will also wear the device and pads for a 30-minute duration; upon completion, post-VAS scores and a patient satisfaction survey will be obtained.
Interventions
Application of TENS pads and wearing of the TENS device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presents to the Emergency Department in an ambulatory status
- Has a complaint of traumatic back pain, acute or acute-on-chronic, which is 3 weeks or less in duration.
- Is designated to an Emergency Severity Index Category of 4 or 5.
- Patient must be unfamiliar with TENS use
- Projected wait time of greater than 30 minutes before a visit with an Emergency Department provider is anticipated based on triage category
- Not actively pregnant for female patients
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has a history of using TENS in the past
- Patient is actively pregnant
- History of narcotic use or abuse in the last 24 hours
- Patient has a cardiac pacemaker or a neurostimulation-implant device
- Patient is designated to an Emergency Severity Index Category of 1, 2, or 3
- Patient has an open wound, abrasion, skin rash, or tattoo \< 6 weeks old where pads will be placed
- Patient has a current history of Low Back Pain 'red flags' (Bilateral radicular symptoms, saddle anesthesia or paresthesia, bladder incontinence, or bowel incontinence) which require immediate attention.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
William Beaumont Army Medical Center
Fort Bliss, Texas, 79920, United States
Related Publications (7)
Bi X, Lv H, Chen BL, Li X, Wang XQ. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jan;27(1):23-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.23. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
PMID: 25642029BACKGROUNDSluka KA, Walsh D. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness. J Pain. 2003 Apr;4(3):109-21. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2003.434.
PMID: 14622708BACKGROUNDBrosseau L, Milne S, Robinson V, Marchand S, Shea B, Wells G, Tugwell P. Efficacy of the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 15;27(6):596-603. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203150-00007.
PMID: 11884907BACKGROUNDChandran P, Sluka KA. Development of opioid tolerance with repeated transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation administration. Pain. 2003 Mar;102(1-2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00381-0.
PMID: 12620611BACKGROUNDLauretti GR, Oliveira R, Parada F, Mattos AL. The New Portable Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Device Was Efficacious in the Control of Primary Dysmenorrhea Cramp Pain. Neuromodulation. 2015 Aug;18(6):522-6; discussion 522-7. doi: 10.1111/ner.12269. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
PMID: 25655828BACKGROUNDAyyildiz A, Akgul T, Nuhoglu B. Re: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: an effective treatment for pain caused by renal colic in emergency care. B. Mora, E. Giorni, M. Dobrovits, R. Barker, T. Lang, C. Gore and A. Kober, J Urol 2006; 175: 1737. J Urol. 2007 Jan;177(1):405. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.013. No abstract available.
PMID: 17162100BACKGROUNDGozani SN. Fixed-site high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for treatment of chronic low back and lower extremity pain. J Pain Res. 2016 Jun 28;9:469-79. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S111035. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27418854BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- After computer-generated randomization, participants will either receive the active TENS treatment for 30 minutes, or receive the application of TENS pads and wear the device with no electrical stimulation. Both groups will have pre and post visual analogue scores assessed.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Captain David Manley, PA-C, Emergency Medicine Physician Assistant Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2019
First Posted
April 5, 2019
Study Start
April 2, 2019
Primary Completion
May 16, 2019
Study Completion
May 16, 2019
Last Updated
June 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- 3 years, or as determined by the WBAMC Department of Clinical Investigations.
- Access Criteria
- Principal Investigator, WBAMC Department of Clinical Investigations, WBAMC Emergency Medicine Physician Assistant Residency Program Director.
Once the study is completed, the data used for statistical analysis will be void of personally identifiable information. This data will be in electronic form for use in government-approved software, such as Microsoft Office. These documents will be distributed only to the Primary Investigator and the William Beaumont Army Medical Center (WBAMC) Department of Clinical Investigations assistance with statistical analysis or future publishing consideration. All paper documents are to be maintained in accordance with Department of Clinical Investigations policies; study-specific electronic documents will be kept for a minimum of 3 years before deletion. Upon study closure, all personally identifiable information (including the Master Key) will be destroyed or deleted, and a de-identified data set maintained by the WBAMC Emergency Medicine Physician Assistant Residency Program Director for further study as needed. No human biological specimens will be maintained.