Pain During Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Sub-tenon Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Vitreoretinal surgery has evolved to less invasive procedures, and it is used to treat a wide range of diseases. So anesthesia for vitreoretinal procedures has evolved, promoting adequate analgesia while reducing risks to the patient. In the present study two types of procedures for anesthesia during vitreoretinal surgery are evaluated regarding the pain referred by the patient during the whole procedure: peribulbar anesthesia versus sub-tenon injection plus topical jelly anesthesia. Through the comparative analysis of the pain scale of the two groups it is expected that the two modalities present the same anesthetic efficacy, showing that the methods used may be equivalent.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Jan 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2019
CompletedNovember 4, 2019
October 1, 2019
8 months
April 2, 2019
October 31, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain score
Pain score referred by the patient measured with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of ruler with 100 cm in length and scale from 0 to 100, where the numbers of this one are visible only in the side of the examiner. It is constructed from a metal ruler with a total length of one meter, supported by two transparent acrylic side supports and a sliding and movable metal weight on the metallic part of the ruler. Before the measurement of pain, the examiner will explain to the patients the functioning of the VAS. Each patient will be encouraged to pass the marker along the scale, with the help of the examiner. It will be made clear to him that point "0" is the point of the scale which represented "no pain", what is considered the better outcome, and point "100" corresponded to the most intense pain he could feel. The patient will be asked about: Intraoperative pain - the intensity of pain throughout the procedure.
Once 30 minutes after the end of the vitrectomy surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Surgical complications
Once At the end of vitrectomy surgery
Other Outcomes (2)
Duration of surgery
Once At the end of vitrectomy surgery
Anesthetic medications
Once during the vitrectomy surgery
Study Arms (2)
Group 1- Sub-tenon plus lidocaine jelly
EXPERIMENTALPatients are going to be submitted to lidocaine 2% jelly topical anesthesia for 5 minutes then to sub-tenon injection of 2-4 ml of ropivacaine 10% previous to 23 G pars plana vitrectomy.
Group 2- peribulbar
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are going to be submitted to peribulbar injection of 4-6 ml of ropivacaine 10% previous to 23 G pars plana vitrectomy.
Interventions
Lidocaine 2% jelly applied to conjunctival fornices for 5 minutes then injection of 2-4 ml of ropivacaine 10% in the sub-tenon space with a blunt cannula through a temporal inferior incision
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients that have the diagnosis of epiretinal membrane, macular hole, complication of diabetic retinopathy such as vitreous hemorrhage or traction retinal detachment or other vitreomacular diseases that require treatment by pars plana vitrectomy.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous pars plana vitrectomy in the studied eye.
- Previous scleral buckle surgery
- Uncontrolled arterial hypertension
- Any ocular surgery performed in the studied eye in the previous three months
- Medical or psychological condition that preclude study adherence
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Medicine - Clinical Hospital
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil
Related Publications (8)
Tang S, Lai P, Lai M, Zou Y, Li J, Li S. Topical anesthesia in transconjunctival sutureless 25-gauge vitrectomy for macular-based disorders. Ophthalmologica. 2007;221(1):65-8. doi: 10.1159/000096526.
PMID: 17183205BACKGROUNDStevens JD, Foss AJ, Hamilton AM. No-needle one-quadrant sub-tenon anaesthesia for panretinal photocoagulation. Eye (Lond). 1993;7 ( Pt 6):768-71. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.180.
PMID: 8119430BACKGROUNDSpaeth G. Ophthalmic Surgery, Principles and Practice. Third Edition. Saunders, Philadelphia, 2003.
BACKGROUNDSousa FAEF, Silva JA. Avaliação e mensuração da dor em contextos clínicos e de pesquisa. Rev. Dor, 2004;5(4):408-429.
BACKGROUNDRoman SJ, Chong Sit DA, Boureau CM, Auclin FX, Ullern MM. Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia: an efficient and safe technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Aug;81(8):673-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.8.673.
PMID: 9349156BACKGROUNDRevill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MI. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. 1976 Nov;31(9):1191-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x.
PMID: 1015603BACKGROUNDRao GP, Wong D, Groenewald C, McGalliard JN, Jones A, Ridges PJ. Local anaesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery: a case-control study of 200 cases. Eye (Lond). 1998;12 ( Pt 3a):407-11. doi: 10.1038/eye.1998.96.
PMID: 9775241BACKGROUNDTheocharis IP, Alexandridou A, Tomic Z. A two-year prospective study comparing lidocaine 2% jelly versus peribulbar anaesthesia for 25G and 23G sutureless vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep;245(9):1253-8. doi: 10.1007/s00417-007-0556-y. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
PMID: 17342504RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jefferson AS Ribeiro, PhD
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2019
First Posted
April 4, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
August 31, 2019
Study Completion
October 31, 2019
Last Updated
November 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We intend to have patient data stored but not individually available for researches at other sites in order to preserve anonymity of the patient.