NCT03902678

Brief Summary

Since not every portal vein thrombus (PVT) in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a tumor thrombus, since the nature of the thrombus will ultimately determine the course of treatment, and since PVT may be even the initial sign of an undetected HCC, every effort should be made to distinguish between a tumor and a non-tumor PVT. In addition, malignant PVT does not always demonstrate neovascularity and/or enhancement, which makes fine needle aspiration (FNA) necessary in order to characterize the nature of the PVT. Sampling of portal vein thrombus with trans-abdominal ultrasound guidance may lead to erroneous results because of inadvertent inclusion of normal hepatocytes or associated liver masses. Further, potential adverse events of trans-abdominal portal vein sampling include serious biliary and/or vascular injury. In contrast to the percutaneous approach, Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) provides a unique view and access to the main portal vein. From the duodenal bulb and second part of the duodenum, the portal vein can be visualized from the confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins into the porta hepatis. Periportal collateral vessels or cavernous transformation of the portal vein, which commonly are associated with portal vein thrombosis, are also easily and reliably detected by EUS instruments with color Doppler US capability. With a linear-array echo-endoscope, the portal vein can be punctured easily with a fine needle under direct visualization, while avoiding the adjacent hepatic artery, bile duct, and collateral vessels (if present). Because the approach is not trans-hepatic, it eliminates any need to avoid the primary tumor and any possibility of contaminating the specimen with hepatocytes, as can occur if the needle tracks through the liver parenchyma. Thus, the rate of false-positive diagnoses is likely to be lower with the EUS compared with the percutaneous approach

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 11, 2017

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 4, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 11, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 11, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

April 4, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

January 26, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 2, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

EUSFNAPVT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of patients with bland portal vein thrombosis diagnosed by triphasic abdominal CT who are proven to have malignant cells by histopathology obtained via EUS-guided FNA

    Histopathology of biopsies taken from bland portal vein thrombus which diagnosed by triphasic CT abdomen to evaluate the possibility of malignant PVT that was not discovered by imaging technique (Abdominal ultrasound and triphasic abdominal CT )

    3 days up to 2 weeks

  • Percentage of patients with portal vein thrombosis who underwent EUS guided FNA and had complications as a result of the invasive maneuver

    assessment of safety of the procedure ( The patients admitted and the new ones will be admitted to specialized medical hospital for 24 h after the procedure to exclude the possibility of bleeding at puncture site, risk of biliary peritonitis, and extravasation from the site of the thrombus.

    2 days

Study Arms (1)

EUS - FNA for benign PVT by imaging

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention: Procedure/Surgery: EUS guided fine needle aspiration of portal vein thrombus

Procedure: EUS guided fine needle aspiration of portal vein thrombus

Interventions

endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of portal vein thrombus which did not fulfill criteria of malignancy by imaging technique

EUS - FNA for benign PVT by imaging

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with liver cirrhosis and PVT which don't fulfill criteria of malignancy by triphasic CT abdomen defined as, (neovascularity of thrombus, arterial enhancement with rapid washout, direct invasion by adjacent hepatic mass and diameter of thrombus more than 23 mm), either :
  • With or without hepatic mass
  • Undergone local treatment or surgical treatment following a diagnosis of HCC and develop PVT during their follow up.

You may not qualify if:

  • Uncooperative or excessively apprehensive patient
  • Anticoagulation treatment or non-substituted coagulopathy (International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.5, Platelet count ≤ 50.000 cells/mm3, heparin administration at therapeutic doses).
  • Inhibition of platelet aggregation by clopidogrel and other thienopyridines.
  • Contraindications of sedation (Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus, Uncontrolled Thyroid Disorders, Pregnancy, Respiratory Embarrassment, Reactional Drugs like Antidepressants and Anti-anxiety Agents).
  • Patients fulfilling criteria of malignancy by triphasic CT on abdomen.
  • Extra hepatic metastasis of HCC.
  • Child-Pugh classification stage C.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

specialized medical hospital, Mansourah University

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (9)

  • Catalano OA, Choy G, Zhu A, Hahn PF, Sahani DV. Differentiation of malignant thrombus from bland thrombus of the portal vein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: application of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology. 2010 Jan;254(1):154-62. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09090304.

    PMID: 20032150BACKGROUND
  • Handa P, Crowther M, Douketis JD. Portal vein thrombosis: a clinician-oriented and practical review. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2014 Jul;20(5):498-506. doi: 10.1177/1076029612473515. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

    PMID: 23364162BACKGROUND
  • Lai R, Stephens V, Bardales R. Diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma by EUS-FNA of a portal vein thrombus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Apr;59(4):574-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00007-0. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15044903BACKGROUND
  • Tarantino L, Ambrosino P, Di Minno MN. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating malignant from benign portal vein thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 28;21(32):9457-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9457.

    PMID: 26327753BACKGROUND
  • ASGE Technology Committee; Trikudanathan G, Pannala R, Bhutani MS, Melson J, Navaneethan U, Parsi MA, Thosani N, Trindade AJ, Watson RR, Maple JT. EUS-guided portal vein interventions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):883-888. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Mar 18. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28320514BACKGROUND
  • Viechtbauer W, Smits L, Kotz D, Bude L, Spigt M, Serroyen J, Crutzen R. A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;68(11):1375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

    PMID: 26146089BACKGROUND
  • Kayar Y, Turkdogan KA, Baysal B, Unver N, Danalioglu A, Senturk H. EUS-guided FNA of a portal vein thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma. Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Jun 3;21:86. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.86.6991. eCollection 2015.

  • Michael H, Lenza C, Gupta M, Katz DS. Endoscopic Ultrasound -guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of a Portal Vein Thrombus to Aid in the Diagnosis and Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2011 Feb;7(2):124-9. No abstract available.

  • Rustagi T, Gleeson FC, Chari ST, Abu Dayyeh BK, Farnell MB, Iyer PG, Kendrick ML, Pearson RK, Petersen BT, Rajan E, Topazian MD, Truty MJ, Vege SS, Wang KK, Levy MJ. Remote malignant intravascular thrombi: EUS-guided FNA diagnosis and impact on cancer staging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.025. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Magdy H. Atwa, Professor

    Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Dina S. Eskandere

CONTACT

Ahmad Y. Altonbary, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Use of histopathology obtained from endoscopic ultrasound -fine needle aspiration of portal vein thrombus for identification of malignant thrombus which did not fulfill criteria of malignancy by abdominal ultrasound and triphasic abdominal CT
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2019

First Posted

April 4, 2019

Study Start

May 11, 2017

Primary Completion

May 11, 2019

Study Completion

July 11, 2019

Last Updated

April 4, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations