Comparison of 1550nm Fractional Laser Alone Versus in Combination With Microneedling for the Treatment of Acne Scars
A Randomized, Double-blind, Split-face Controlled Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy of Combination Microneedling and Non-ablative Fractional Laser Versus Non-ablative Fractional Laser Alone for Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scars
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acne scarring is an unfortunate consequence of inflammatory acne vulgaris that often leads to significant cosmetic and psychosocial impacts. Although there have been many advances in the treatment of acne scarring, it remains one of the greatest challenges in cosmetic and laser dermatology. There have been a multitude of studies establishing the efficacy of non-ablative fractional laser therapy for the treatment of atrophic acne scars, and it is widely regarded as one of the best available treatments. More recently, there has been a renewed interest in controlled, non-thermal dermal injury via microneedling devices in the treatment of atrophic acne scars. Where there is a gap in the literature, however, is in the evaluation of the combination of non-ablative fractional laser resurfacing with microneedling in the treatment of atrophic acne scars. The investigators' study will compare the safety and efficacy of using non-ablative fractional laser versus a combination of microneedling and non-ablative fractional laser for atrophic acne scars using a randomized, double-blind, split-face study. The investigators' aim is to further elucidate the pathogenesis of acne scarring and the best approaches for treatment. In doing so, the investigators will study a combination approach to this complex problem in order to better serve future patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedJanuary 28, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.1 years
March 26, 2019
January 27, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in acne scarring
Two blinded evaluators will use standardized digital photographic review to grade acne scar improvement on a quartile grading scale (1 = 1% to 25%, 2 = 26 to 50%, 3 = 51 to 75%, 4 = \>76% improvement).
20 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Non-ablative Fractional Laser
ACTIVE COMPARATORNon-ablative fractional laser (brand name Fraxel Restore) only on one half of the face.
Non-ablative Fractional Laser Plus Microneedling
ACTIVE COMPARATORNon-ablative fractional laser (brand name Fraxel Restore) in combination with a microneedling device (SkinPen) on the other half of the face.
Interventions
In the study, one side of the face will be treated with non-ablative fractional laser monthly for three months.
In the study, one side of the face will be treated with a combination of non-ablative fractional laser and microneedling monthly for three months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All gender patients
- Age older than 18 years
- Fitzpatrick skin types I-III
- Facial acne scarring of grades III-IV
- Both sides of the face should have similar amount and severity of acne scarring
You may not qualify if:
- History of keloidal scarring
- Localized or active infection in the treatment region
- Immunodeficiency disorders
- Porphyria or light sensitivity
- Connective tissue disorders.
- Pregnant or nursing
- Recent isotretinoin use within the past 6 months
- Renal Disease
- Allergies to lidocaine, tetracaine, valacyclovir
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mathew Avram, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Dermatologic Surgery and Laser and Cosmetic Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2019
First Posted
April 3, 2019
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 30, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
January 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share