NCT03901144

Brief Summary

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is among the most common chronic types of inflammatory skin disease and it is characterised by exacerbations or relapses over years. The patients have a genetically impaired skin barrier that can be evaluated by measuring the transepidermal water loss (TEWL), which is increased in both dry skin and clinically normal skin in AD patients. Moisturisers are first line treatment for AD patients and moisturisers are the most prescribed products in dermatology. The use of moisturisers have been found to reduce the need for steroids. The newly developed moisturizing cream 1107.57 is intended for people with dry skin symptoms, such as dryness, itching, and flaking. As most people with dry skin of different origin have an impaired skin barrier function, it is important to investigate the possible influence on the skin barrier after long-term (several weeks') treatment. It is of utmost importance to evaluate different moisturisers head-to-head in order to facilitate an evidence-based choice of moisturiser. The primary objective of the trial is to determine whether applying the test cream 1107.57 for 4 weeks is superior in terms of skin barrier strengthening, when compared with (1) no treatment and (2) two reference creams in adults with a predisposition to a skin barrier defect. Secondary objectives are to determine whether there is a difference between 1107.57 and (1) no treatment and (2) the two reference creams in skin moisturization, tolerability, cream consumption and safety. Participants will treat their lower volar forearms for 28 days with three different creams (test cream and two reference creams) and leave one area untreated as a control. Each forearm will have two different treatment areas and treatment allocation will be randomized. One Finger Tip Unit (FTU) of each cream will be applied twice daily on the designated study area for 28 days. On day 1 and 29 the transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin capacitance is measured on their forearms to evaluate the effect on skin barrier function and skin hydration. Furthermore, on day 31, after challenge with 1 % sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) on day 29, the susceptibility to irritation caused by SLS will be evaluated visually and by measuring TEWL on their forearms. Study participants will attend visits at the start of randomised therapy and on day 5, 15, 29 and 31. During the study period the participants will also grade and evaluate the tolerability of the different creams.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 21, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 3, 2019

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 29, 2019

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 10, 2019

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 20, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

December 20, 2021

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

April 1, 2019

Results QC Date

August 19, 2021

Last Update Submit

December 13, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

atopic dermatitisskin barriermoisturiseremollient

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Skin Barrier Strengthening Effect by Measurement of Trans Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL) Before and After Induction of Skin Irritation

    The change in TEWL from treated and untreated skin before and after induction of skin irritation with SLS. SLS increases TEWL. An effective treatment protects skin from irritation and less TEWL increase is anticipated compared to untreated skin

    day 29 prior to irritant application and day 31 following application

  • Skin Barrier Strengthening Effect by Measurement of Skin Redness Before and After Induction of Skin Irritation as Assessed by the Erythema Index (Change From Day 29 to Day 31)

    Skin redness measurement by Objective Erythema (2D Skin Imaging) on treated and untreated skin before (day 29) and after (day 31) induction of skin irritation with SLS. Captured 2D images are analysed to determine the skin erythema index (degree of redness, arbitrary numerical value), where a higher value denotes a stronger reaction/more redness. An effective treatment is anticipated to protect the skin from irritation, i.e. a weaker reaction from SLS/less redness compared to the untreated skin. Data is presented as change from day 29 to day 31

    The 2D Skin Imaging was performed on day 15, day 29 and on day 31. Only day 29 and 31 was included in the statistical analysis

  • Skin Barrier Strengthening Effect by Measurement of Skin Redness Before and After Induction of Skin Irritation as Assessed by Mexameter (Change From Day 29 to Day 31)

    Objective skin redness measurement by Mexameter on treated and untreated skin before (day 29) and after (day 31) induction of skin irritation with SLS. Skin redness is measured using a C\&K Mexameter probe to quantify SLS-induced skin irritation (arbitrary numerical scale). An effective treatment is anticipated to protect the skin from irritation, i.e. a weaker reaction from SLS/less redness compared to the untreated skin. Data is presented as change from day 29 to day 31

    Measured on day 29 and 31

  • Skin Barrier Strengthening Effect by Measurement of Skin Redness Before Induction of Skin Irritation as Assessed by Visual Scoring

    Skin redness by visual scoring on treated and untreated skin before induction of skin irritation with SLS. Skin redness was evaluated on a 4-point visual scale from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates no redness/reaction and 3 indicates strong erythema.

    Skin redness was scored on day 29

  • Skin Barrier Strengthening Effect by Measurement of Skin Redness After Induction of Skin Irritation as Assessed by Visual Scoring

    Skin redness by visual scoring on treated and untreated skin after induction of skin irritation with SLS. Skin redness was evaluated on a 4-point visual scale from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates no redness/reaction and 3 indicates strong erythema.

    Skin redness was scored on day 31

Study Arms (4)

Test cream (2% urea/20% glycerol)

EXPERIMENTAL

Topical cream, 1 Finger Tip Unit per treatment area on the lower volar forearms twice daily for 28 days

Drug: 2% urea/20% glycerol cream

Reference cream 1: Miniderm® 20% cream (20% glycerol)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Topical cream, 1 Finger Tip Unit per treatment area on the lower volar forearms twice daily for 28 days

Drug: Miniderm® 20% cream

Reference cream 2: Diprobase® cream (cream without humectants)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Topical cream, 1 Finger Tip Unit per treatment area on the lower volar forearms twice daily for 28 days

Drug: Diprobase® cream

Untreated

NO INTERVENTION

Untreated skin area on the volar forearm

Interventions

Moisturizing cream for topical application

Also known as: Miniderm Duo 20 mg/g + 200 mg/g cream, Canomini 20 mg/g + 200 mg/g cream
Test cream (2% urea/20% glycerol)

Moisturizing cream for topical application

Reference cream 1: Miniderm® 20% cream (20% glycerol)

Emollient cream for topical application

Reference cream 2: Diprobase® cream (cream without humectants)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The participants have to meet all of the following criteria to be eligible to enter the study:
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Male or female and aged 18 years or above
  • Volunteers able to read and understand English
  • A personal history of atopic dermatitis

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants meeting any of the following criteria will not be permitted to enter the study:
  • Eczema on the volar forearms requiring anti-inflammatory treatment
  • Possible allergy to ingredients in the study medications.
  • Any serious current medical condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with the evaluation of the results or may be contraindicated by the use of the test medications
  • Use of any concomitant medication that may interfere with the study related activities or assessment of efficacy, as judged by the Investigator
  • Use of any topical product, including cosmetic leave-on products on the volar forearms, within 1 week prior to, and throughout the study
  • Female participant who, according to the participant, is pregnant or breast-feeding, or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Any participant-related factor suggesting potential poor compliance with study procedures (e.g. psychiatric disorders, history of alcohol or substance abuse), as judged by the Investigator
  • Enrolment in any interventional study or use of an investigational drug within 3 months prior to the screening visit
  • Volunteers judged by the PI to be inappropriate for the trial.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Sheffield Medical School

Sheffield, S10 2RX, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dermatitis, Atopic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin Diseases, GeneticGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesDermatitisSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin Diseases, EczematousHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Tina Holm
Organization
Perrigo/ACO Hud Nordic

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Every patient use three different creams (1 test cream, 2 reference creams) and one untreated area. They are their own controls
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2019

First Posted

April 3, 2019

Study Start

February 21, 2019

Primary Completion

November 29, 2019

Study Completion

December 10, 2019

Last Updated

December 20, 2021

Results First Posted

December 20, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations