A Novel Analgesic Method for Postoperative Pain Relief After Cesarean Section: Intraoperative Superior Hypogastric Block
1 other identifier
interventional
154
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cesarean section is the most common inpatient surgical procedure in the United States with 1.3 million cesarean deliveries performed in 2015. Cesarean section frequency is increasing rapidly in worldwide, especially in middle and high income countries. Postoperative pain is an expected outcome for patients following surgical procedures. Inadequate pain relief is still a common problem among hospitalized patients. Cesarean section ranked ninth for pain severity among 179 different surgical procedures. Multimodal pain therapy has been suggested for postoperative pain management after cesarean delivery. The most commonly used modalities are systemic administration of opioids, either by intramuscular injection or IV by patient-controlled analgesia, and neuraxial injection of opioid as part of a regional anesthetic for cesarean delivery. These techniques have specific advantages and disadvantages. Superior hypogastric plexus blockade (SHB) has been shown an effective method for pain relıef after gynecologic procedures, it has been shown that SHP can be easily performed intraoperatively during hysterectomy procedure In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of SHB performed intraoperatively for postoperative pain relief after cesarean section. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use SHB intraoperatively for pain relief after cesarean section in the literature.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 postoperative-pain
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2019
CompletedApril 1, 2019
March 1, 2019
2 months
March 23, 2019
March 28, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain scores on rest and on movement at 24 th hour after surgery
Postoperative pain assessed by the 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable
up to 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Pain scores on rest and on movement at 2,6 and 48 th hour after surgery
Up to 48 hours
Opioid or NSAID requirement after surgery
Up to 48 hours
Return of gastrointestinal function
Up to 48 hours
Rate of nausea and vomiting
Up to 48 hours
length of surgery
Up to 1 hour
Study Arms (2)
Superior Hypogastric Block group
EXPERIMENTALThe group which superior hypogastric block performed intraoperatively
placebo controlled group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe group which placebo used
Interventions
SHP is situated anterior to L5-S1 vertebral bodies, caudal to the bifurcation of the aorta. An injection of 20 ml of bupivacaine 2,5 mg/ml or saline 9 mg/ml was done retroperitoneally in the area.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Term singleton pregnant women between ages 18 to 40 with no previous history of cesarean section or abdominal surgery were scheduled for elective cesarean operation under general anaesthesia. Only ASA 1-2 patients were included to the study.
You may not qualify if:
- We excluded patients with suspected or manifest bleeding disturbances, chronic pelvic pain, allergy to NSAID's or opioids, atopia, bronchial asthma, diabetes mellitus, the presence of liver or kidney diseases, abuse of drugs or alcohol, and patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension or preeclampsia. The patients underwent emergency cesarean section were also excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maltepe University Faculty of Medicine
Istanbul, 34844, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Berna Haliloglu Peker, Prof. Dr
Maltepe University Faculty of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients were randomly allocated in two groups. The allocation sequence was generated by a random number table, and group allocation was concealed in sealed, opaque envelopes that were not opened until operation. During the operation the envelope was opened by a nurse outside the operating theatre. The nurse prepared a blind syringe with the study drug, which was then transferred to a sterile bowl in the operating room and injected. Both bupivacaine and saline are colourless and not possible to identify the solution by its visual appearance, or by smell. The envelope was then sealed again and not opened until the study was concluded. The patients, anesthesiologists, and nurses providing postoperative care were blinded to group assignment
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr. Berna Haliloglu Peker
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2019
First Posted
April 1, 2019
Study Start
January 2, 2019
Primary Completion
February 20, 2019
Study Completion
March 20, 2019
Last Updated
April 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share