COMPARISON OF TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK, LOCAL ANESTHETIC INJECTION TO THE PORT SITES AND INTRAPERITONEAL LOCAL ANESTHESIA APPLICATIONS IN POSTOPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
APPENDECTOMY
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The most important determinant of the recovery in abdominal surgery is postoperative pain. Postoperative pain can be explained by 2 pathways connected to the peritoneum; The first is the parietal peritoneum, whose innervation is very rich and the other is the visceral peritoneum which is stimulated at the vagus level. Since 1950, they have been injecting local anesthetic for post-surgery pain. inflammation and peritoneal irritation are the most important factors of pain when acute appendicitis is diagnosed. . This increases the length of hospital stay and increases the cost of pain relief, and reduces patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the application of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block . local anesthetic injection to the port sites, intraperitoneal periappendiceal local anesthetic injection is compared with the control group without any local anesthetic application to investigate which group has more analgesic effectiveness and thus reduce the amount of analgesics needed postoperatively, hospitalization Shortening the duration of the patient and taking the patient comfort to the next level.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 postoperative-pain
Started Nov 2018
Typical duration for phase_4 postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2021
CompletedMarch 23, 2021
March 1, 2021
2 years
December 15, 2018
March 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
compare of local anesthetic applying methods for postoperative pain relief by VAS (Visual Analog Scala)
pain scores of the participants will be followed at postoperative 1,2,4,6,12,24 hour (up to 24 hours). (VAS: from 0 to 10, 0 = no pain, 10 = the worst pain) The higher score idicates the worse outcome.
24 hours
Study Arms (4)
transversus abdominis plane Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransversus abdominis plane block (10 cc / 10 cc, 0.5% bupivacaine to the right and left transversus abdominis muscle regions) will be applied.
TROCHAR SITES LOCAL ANESTHETIC INJECTION
ACTIVE COMPARATORlocal anesthetic injection (6 cc to subxiphoid and infraumbilical trocar sites, 4 cc instead of 2 cc, 0.5% bupivacaine solution to be applied)
INTRAPERİTONEAL LOCAL ANESTHETIC SPREADING METHOD
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntraperitoneal direct vision of the appendix excision area-periappendiciall area under the direct injection of local anesthetic spraying process (percutaneous method injected into the periappendicial area 1: 1 diluted with 20 cc SF, 20 cc 0.5% bupivacaine solution total 40 cc spraying will be applied.
CONTROL GROUP
NO INTERVENTIONgroup will be the control group and any of these methods will not be applied,
Interventions
In our study this local anesthetic agent will be applied for postoperative pain relief
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 18 years of age with acute appendicitis in emergency department
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have to undergo peroperative open appendectomy procedure.
- Patients with local anesthetic or non steroid antiinflammatory allergy
- Patients in pregnancy
- Patients with connective tissue disease
- Patients with malignancy detected in pathological examination of postoperative appendix and patients with any malignancy diagnosis
- Perforated patients peroperatively
- Patients who were evaluated as plastron appendicitis peroperatively
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Research and Training Hospital
Istanbul, 34734, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- asistant doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2018
First Posted
December 31, 2018
Study Start
November 1, 2018
Primary Completion
November 1, 2020
Study Completion
March 1, 2021
Last Updated
March 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share