A Pragmatic Trial of Two Strategies for Implementing an Effective eHealth HIV Prevention Program (Keep It Up! 3.0)
1 other identifier
interventional
2,125
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates and compares two implementation strategies of an online HIV prevention intervention: Strategy 1 in which community-based organizations apply, and are selected, for funding to deliver Keep It Up! through current HIV testing programs; and Strategy 2 which is a "direct-to-consumer" model where centralized staff at Northwestern University recruit participants nationally through online advertising campaigns and manage engagement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 9, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2023
CompletedJuly 7, 2023
July 1, 2023
3.5 years
March 28, 2019
July 6, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Public Health Impact (reach X effectiveness)
Public Health Impact (PHI) involves the reach into the county's YMSM community, weighted by HIV risk (i.e., engagement of YMSM from higher risk communities is valued more), and effectiveness at reducing HIV risk, defined as condomless anal sex, STIs, and adherent PrEP use (i.e., three major risk factors for HIV expected to be modified by KIU!).
12 Weeks
Study Arms (2)
Community Based Organization (CBO) Delivery
EXPERIMENTALCBOs will be selected through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process. The RFP will describe research and KIU! delivery activities to be conducted as part of the study and allowable budget to carry out the activities. The RFP will ask CBOs to describe past experience providing HIV services for YMSM. Selected CBOs will recruit participants into the intervention and encourage participants to complete each session of intervention content at baseline, 6 Week Follow-up, and 12 Week Follow-up. Participants in the CBO delivery arm will receive baseline HIV and STI testing at a CBO. Participants will receive an at-home STI test kit at 12 Week Follow-up if testing is not provided at their CBO site.
Direct to Consumer (DTC) Delivery
EXPERIMENTALIn the DTC arm, participants will be recruited online via paid social media advertising (e.g., Facebook, Instagram). Advertisements will target placements by age, gender, sexual orientation, racial background, "likes" that are relevant to YMSM (e.g., local LGBT organizations, "out" celebrities), and location (i.e., target county). Dating/sex-seeking apps (e.g., Grindr) will also be used to recruit YMSM, using a similar advertising approach as social media. These online recruitment strategies will be supplemented by referrals from local organizations and participant registries, and snowball recruitment. Study staff at Northwestern University will manage this recruitment process and encourage participants to complete each session of intervention content at baseline, 6 Week Follow-up, and 12 Week Follow-up. Participants in the DTC delivery arm will receive at-home HIV and STI test kits at baseline. Participants will receive an at-home STI test kit at 12 Week Follow-up.
Interventions
KIU! is an online HIV prevention intervention developed for high-risk young men who have sex with men (YMSM) who recently tested HIV negative. Content was developed in collaboration with YMSM-serving CBOs and subjected to usability testing with diverse YMSM. The Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model and eLearning principles guided development of highly interactive, engaging, and culturally relevant health messages. KIU! involves 7 modules completed across 3 sessions, totaling \~1 hour of main content, plus 2 booster sessions at 6- and 12-week follow-ups. Each module is based on a setting or situation relevant to YMSM (e.g., connecting to the gay community and meeting guys through apps), with developmentally appropriate behavior change content embedded. KIU! uses diverse delivery methods (e.g. videos, animation, games) to address HIV knowledge gaps, motivate safer behaviors, teach behavioral skills, and instill self-efficacy for preventive behaviors.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- recently received an HIV negative test result OR self-report negative or unknown HIV status
- speaks/reads English
- has an active email address
You may not qualify if:
- has not been on PrEP and adherent for 6 months prior
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwestern Universitylead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
- Boston Medical Centercollaborator
- Weill Medical College of Cornell Universitycollaborator
- Marquette Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (4)
Zamantakis A, Zapata JP, Smith JD, Danielson EC, Macapagal K, Saber R, Li D, Benbow N, Mustanski B. Incentivizing Prevention: Community Based Organizations' Perceptions on Financial Incentives for Recruitment and Retention of Participants in Keep it Up! (KIU!), an eHealth HIV Prevention Intervention. AIDS Behav. 2025 Nov 21. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04963-w. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41266922DERIVEDMustanski B, Benbow N, Macapagal K, Li D, Madkins K, Saber R, Linas B, Smith JD, Brown CH, Munroe S, Reddy S, Schackman BR, Swann G, Janulis P, Zamantakis A, Zapata JP. Comparing Implementation and Effectiveness Outcomes for Two Implementation Strategies of the Keep It Up! Digital HIV Prevention Program: A Type 3 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial. AIDS Behav. 2025 Dec;29(12):4030-4042. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04838-0. Epub 2025 Aug 19.
PMID: 40826259DERIVEDZamantakis A, Zapata JP, Greenawalt I, Knapp AA, Benbow N, Mustanski B. Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Keep It Up!, A Digital Health Intervention, in Community-Based Organizations. AIDS Behav. 2024 Dec;28(12):3944-3955. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04525-6. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
PMID: 39387999DERIVEDLi DH, Zamantakis A, Zapata JP, Danielson EC, Saber R, Benbow N, Smith JD, Swann G, Macapagal K, Mustanski B. A mixed-methods approach to assessing implementers' readiness to adopt digital health interventions (RADHI). Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Aug 27;5(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00628-2.
PMID: 39192345DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian Mustanski, PhD
Northwestern University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2019
First Posted
April 1, 2019
Study Start
October 9, 2019
Primary Completion
March 31, 2023
Study Completion
March 31, 2023
Last Updated
July 7, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
The PI agrees to develop a de-identified database, codebook, and mechanism by which IPD could be shared with other investigators upon approval of the PI. Data will be available for request approximately 6 months after completion of the project. Interested investigators will be asked to complete a standardized request form stating the specific aims of the analysis, the analytic plans, resources the requestors have to carry out the project, the proposed timeline, and distribution goals (manuscripts and/or grant application). The PI will review these requests to determine whether the proposed analyses constitute an innovative and significant exploration of the data, whether the proposed team has sufficient resources to undertake the request, how data will be protected/managed, and whether there are sufficient resources to honor the request. If any of these issues are problematic, the PI will attempt to negotiate a fair resolution with the interested parties and/or with NIH program staff.