Does The Type of Exercise Influence Outcome in Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain
RCT-RCRSP
Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain: Does The Type of Exercise Influence Outcome? - A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
123
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is the most common shoulder disorder and its chronicization leads to multiple consequences such as early retirement, absenteeism from work, decreased participation and quality of life and expensive yearly healthcare costs (128 739 687 $ according to CNESST). Even though scientific evidence has shown that prioritising physiotherapy exercises over surgery for the initial management of RCRSP is a great way to save on healthcare costs without compromising quality, it does not always result in a resolution of symptoms and patients' quality of life can still be affected thereafter: up to 30% of people with RCRSP remain symptomatic despite rehabilitation interventions. This lack of therapeutic success could be explained by a multitude of factors, but a central issue that can explain a lack of improvement is an inappropriate dosage or choice of exercises prescribed. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 3 non-operative methods of delivering shoulder management (2 types of exercises and an advice and education only group) on symptoms and functional limitations for people with RCRSP. Results from this project should help us further our knowledge on which non-operative treatment to promote with patients presenting with RCRSP, thus decreasing the proportion of individuals experiencing pain even after going through a rehabilitation program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 14, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 29, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 29, 2022
CompletedMarch 7, 2023
March 1, 2023
2.1 years
March 26, 2019
March 5, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in symptoms and functional limitations from baseline to 3 weeks: QuickDASH
The QuickDASH is a self-reported questionnaire that includes 11 items measuring physical disability and symptoms. This tool uses a 5-point (1-5) Likert scale. The total out of 55 is then reported to a score from 0 to 100. Score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
0 and 3 weeks
Change in symptoms and functional limitations from baseline to 6 weeks: QuickDASH
The QuickDASH is a self-reported questionnaire that includes 11 items measuring physical disability and symptoms. This tool uses a 5-point (1-5) Likert scale. The total out of 55 is then reported to a score from 0 to 100. Score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
0 and 6 weeks
Change in symptoms and functional limitations from baseline to 12 weeks: QuickDASH
The QuickDASH is a self-reported questionnaire that includes 11 items measuring physical disability and symptoms. This tool uses a 5-point (1-5) Likert scale. The total out of 55 is then reported to a score from 0 to 100. Score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
0 and 12 weeks
Change in symptoms and functional limitations from baseline to 24 weeks: QuickDASH
The QuickDASH is a self-reported questionnaire that includes 11 items measuring physical disability and symptoms. This tool uses a 5-point (1-5) Likert scale. The total out of 55 is then reported to a score from 0 to 100. Score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
0 and 24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Change in symptoms and functional limitations from baseline to 3 weeks: WORC (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index)
0 and 3 weeks
Change in symptoms and functional limitations from baseline to 6 weeks: WORC
0 and 6 weeks
Change in symptoms and functional limitations from baseline to 12 weeks: WORC
0 and 12 weeks
Change in symptoms and functional limitations from baseline to 24 weeks: WORC
0 and 24 weeks
Change in pain from baseline to 3 weeks: BPI-SF (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form)
0 and 3 weeks
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Strengthening exercises program
EXPERIMENTALMotor control exercises program
EXPERIMENTALEducation and advice
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Participants from this group will be given a progressive shoulder strengthening exercises program based on 1 RM that will involve isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions. The exercises will target shoulder internal/external rotators and abductors and the scapular muscles. They will have to exercise every other day for 12 weeks. At each session with the therapist (6 over a 12 week period), strength will be reassessed and the program will be progressed accordingly. Any questions or concerns will also be addressed and participants will be requested to complete a paper based or digital record of their exercise participation.
Each session will start with a series of clinical tests that will look at the influence of different corrections to alleviate symptoms during upper limb movements.The tests will be performed in a sequential format through four key areas: thoracic repositioning, scapula facilitation, humeral head procedures and neuromodulatory techniques. If a correction reduces pain, that technique will then be performed as exercises and incorporated into the participant's functional movement. In addition, motor control exercises during arm elevation, progressed through a standardized 6-phase retraining sequence, will be executed. Retraining phases will be graded according to: 1) resistance applied on the shoulder; and 2) use or non-use of feedback. Once participants reach pain free execution, the program will be progressed into re-education exercises according to the participants' work, sport and activities of daily living and will incorporate activities involving the upper and lower limbs.
Each participant will be given written information about the shoulder (anatomy and function), basic pain science and will be directed to the Internet to watch a series of carefully selected educational videos. Comprehensive written advice will include: Information about the shoulder and the condition; Pain neuroscience; Activity modification (when to increase and decrease); Pain management (night and day); A series of educational videos to watch with 2 questions to answer per video: a) what was the most important message? and b) was there anything you didn't understand in the video?
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pain of at least 3 months duration
- At least one positive response in the three following categories
- Painful arc of movement (flexion; abduction)
- Positive shoulder impingement test (Neer; Kennedy-Hawkins)
- Pain during resisted isometric shoulder contraction (external rotation; abduction; Jobe)
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical signs of massive rotator cuff tears (gross weakness of rotator cuff muscles in the absence of pain)
- Other shoulder disorders (arthritis, adhesive capsulitis, fracture, acromioclavicular joint pathology)
- Undergone previous shoulder surgery on the same side
- Presence of significant co-morbidity (neurological disorders, rheumatoid arthritis)
- Symptomatic cervical spine pathology defined as reproduction of symptoms with active physiological cervical spine movement
- Inability to understand French or English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Laval Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS)
Québec, Quebec, G1M 2S8, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Dube MO, Desmeules F, Lewis JS, Roy JS. Does the addition of motor control or strengthening exercises to education result in better outcomes for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain? A multiarm randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2023 Apr;57(8):457-463. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105027. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
PMID: 36796859DERIVEDDube MO, Desmeules F, Lewis J, Roy JS. Rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: does the type of exercise influence the outcomes? Protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e039976. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039976.
PMID: 33154058DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jean-Sébastien Roy, PT, PhD
Laval University, Quebec, Qc (Canada)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2019
First Posted
March 27, 2019
Study Start
May 14, 2019
Primary Completion
June 29, 2021
Study Completion
May 29, 2022
Last Updated
March 7, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03