RF-assisted Splenic Preservation VS Conventional Treatment of Blunt Splenic Injury.
Radiofrequency-assisted Splenic Preservation Versus Conventional Treatment of Blunt Splenic Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
122
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Radiofrequency (RF) can be used to treat splenic trauma because of its excellent coagulation hemostasis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of RF-assisted spleen-preserving surgery with that of conventional splenorrhaphy/splenectomy in the treatment of blunt splenic injury. A total of 122 patients with splenic trauma admitted to two tertiary referral centers from June 2011 to June 2014 were included in this prospective cohort study. The 67 patients at one center were treated by radiofrequency-assisted spleen-preserving therapy (RF group), and the 55 patients admitted at the other center underwent conventional treatment (CT group). Demographics and clinical characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Compared to traditional splenorrhaphy and splenectomy, RF-assisted splenic hemostasis and salvage was safe, effective and easy to use in the treatment of splenic injuries. In particular for high-grade splenic injuries, these techniques preserved sufficient splenic tissue without any increase in patients with surgical risk.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2019
CompletedMarch 26, 2019
March 1, 2009
5.3 years
March 20, 2019
March 24, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Mean operative time,
Mean operative time of the RF group was compared with that of CT group.
intraoperative
intraoperative bleeding
Intraoperative bleeding of the RF group was compared with that of CT group.
intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
RF group
EXPERIMENTALradiofrequency-assisted spleen-preserving therapy group.
CT group
NO INTERVENTIONConventional Treatment of Blunt Splenic Injury group.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age below 70
- blunt abdominal injury combined with indication of post-traumatic splenectomy according to the guidelines provided by the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract in 2005
- patients transferred directly to the trauma center after injury who had not been treated by any specific spleen-directed therapy in the transferring hospital
- AAST grade II splenic injury with hemodynamic instability or progressive bleeding requiring active intervention
- AAST grade Ⅲ-Ⅳsplenic injury, or splenic laceration involving less than 50% of the splenic parenchyma
You may not qualify if:
- penetrating abdominal injury
- concomitant organ injury with an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) greater than 4 that threatened the life of the patient
- excessive vascular injury to the splenic pedicle or substantial devitalized splenic tissues when it was expected in when less than 25% of the spleen could be preserved
- patients who had failed NOM
- patients with pathologic splenic rupture
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Southwest Hospital, Chinalead
- West China Second University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institute of hepatobiliary surgery,Southwest Hospital
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400038, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kuansheng Ma, Ph.D
Institute of hepatobiliary surgery,Southwest Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2019
First Posted
March 26, 2019
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2009-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share