One Staged Hybrid Approach of Surgical/Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There are 10 million atrial fibrillation (AF) patients in China, and the patients are risk of stroke, heart failure and sudden death. Persistent AF is still a refractory disease, and single catheter ablation only has a success rate around 30-50%. Hybrid strategy consisting of thoracoscopic epicardial ablation and transvenous endocardial ablation seems to be an attractive procedure to improve the treatment of persistent AF. However, only a few centers reported their preliminary results, and the conclusions are controversial. The investigator previously reported a minimally invasive surgical ablation from left thoracoscope only and achieved good results. Recently, the investigator successfully explored a hybrid procedure combing this unique surgical technique and transvenous catheter ablation. Here, the investigator present a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this novel hybrid procedure. The hypothesis is that a hybrid approach is more efficient than surgical ablation alone in the treatment of persistent AF. This study is a non-randomized controlled study within a single institution. Isolated persistent AF patients admitted to the cardiovascular surgery department of Shanghai Xinhua Hospital will be screened for enrollment of this study. The study will recruit 180 patients in total. Based on their own willingness, the patients will be divided into hybrid group and minimally invasive (MIS) group. The MIS group patients only have surgical ablation surgery from left thoracoscope as the investigator reported before, while the hybrid group patients will have additional transvenous catheter ablation after the surgical ablation is done during the same operation. The ratio of hybrid to MIS group is expected to be 1:1, so that each group contains 90 patients. The perioperative data is collected, and the patients will be followed for 6 months. The primary outcome is the rate of sinus rhythm at 6 months post operation. The secondary outcomes include off antiarrhythmic drug rate, perioperative complications, major cardiovascular events, stroke, left ventricular systolic function, medical expense, serum brain natriuretic peptide level and quality of life. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this novel hybrid procedure, therefore to provide more evidence of the hybrid strategy in the treatment of persistent AF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2019
CompletedJune 14, 2018
June 1, 2018
2.8 years
November 13, 2016
June 13, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sinus rhythm maintenance rate
Based on ECG results from 3 months and 6 months after the surgery. Any non-sinus rhythm lasting \>30 seconds captured on ECG at any time will be considered failure to maintain sinus rhythm
At 6 months after the surgery
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Off any antiarrhythmic drug rate
6 months after the surgery
Perioperative complications
Within 1 month after the surgery
Major cardiovascular events
Within 6 months after discharge
Stroke
Within 6 months after the surgery
Left ventricular systolic function
At 6 months after the surgery
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Hybrid group
EXPERIMENTALMinimally invasive surgical radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation followed by catheterized radiofrequency ablation within the same procedure
MIS group
ACTIVE COMPARATORMinimally invasive surgical radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation only
Interventions
Radiofrequency energy is used for ablation in both arms of this study (Hybrid group and MIS group)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Isolated atrial fibrillation, without structural heart disease.
- Persistent atrial fibrillation (Af last time \> 7 days, including persistent long standing atrial fibrillation)
- Patients with symptomatic AF that is refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic medication; symptomatic patients are those who have been aware of their AF at any time within the last 5 years before enrolment. Symptoms may include, but are not restricted to, palpitations, shortness of breath, chest pain, fatigue, left ventricular dysfunction, or other symptoms, or any combination of these.
- Patient admitted with intent to treat by either hybrid or surgical ablation
- Consent
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation
- Concomitant other cardiac diseases which require surgery at the same procedure, such as heart valve disease, congenital heart disease, coronary disease, dilated cardiomyopathy etc.
- With other forms of severe arrhythmia
- Ejection fraction of left ventricle less than 30%
- Anteroposterior diameter of left atrial over 60mm
- Tumor, active infection, pregnancy.
- Previous surgeries with left thoracotomy, or expected left pleural adhesion, such as history of tuberculosis infection, pleural effusion, pneumothorax etc.
- Hyperthyroidism
- Thrombosis within left atrial appendage
- General conditions too weak to tolerate the surgeries
- Patient's circumstance that precludes completion of follow-up and/or obtaining information from the 1-year follow-up
- Other conditions not appropriate for this study based on the investigators' judgments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Related Publications (14)
Boersma LV, Castella M, van Boven W, Berruezo A, Yilmaz A, Nadal M, Sandoval E, Calvo N, Brugada J, Kelder J, Wijffels M, Mont L. Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation versus surgical ablation treatment (FAST): a 2-center randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):23-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.074047. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
PMID: 22082673BACKGROUNDMuneretto C, Bisleri G, Bontempi L, Cheema FH, Curnis A. Successful treatment of lone persistent atrial fibrillation by means of a hybrid thoracoscopic-transcatheter approach. Innovations (Phila). 2012 Jul-Aug;7(4):254-8. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e31826f0462.
PMID: 23123991BACKGROUNDPison L, La Meir M, van Opstal J, Blaauw Y, Maessen J, Crijns HJ. Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 3;60(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.055.
PMID: 22742400BACKGROUNDPokushalov E, Romanov A, Elesin D, Bogachev-Prokophiev A, Losik D, Bairamova S, Karaskov A, Steinberg JS. Catheter versus surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation after a failed initial pulmonary vein isolation procedure: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;24(12):1338-43. doi: 10.1111/jce.12245. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
PMID: 24016147BACKGROUNDCox JL. A brief overview of surgery for atrial fibrillation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Jan;3(1):80-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.01.05.
PMID: 24516803BACKGROUNDGelsomino S, Van Breugel HN, Pison L, Parise O, Crijns HJ, Wellens F, Maessen JG, La Meir M. Hybrid thoracoscopic and transvenous catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar;45(3):401-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt385. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
PMID: 23904136BACKGROUNDMei J, Ma N, Ding F, Chen Y, Jiang Z, Hu F, Xiao H. Complete thoracoscopic ablation of the left atrium via the left chest for treatment of lone atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):242-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
PMID: 23122696BACKGROUNDPragliola C, Mastroroberto P, Gaudino M, Chello M, Covino E. Staged transthoracic approach to persistent atrial fibrillation (TOP-AF): study protocol for a randomized trial. Trials. 2014 May 26;15:190. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-190.
PMID: 24885377BACKGROUNDBulava A, Mokracek A, Hanis J, Kurfirst V, Eisenberger M, Pesl L. Sequential hybrid procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Mar 25;4(3):e001754. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001754.
PMID: 25809548BACKGROUNDWang PJ. Hybrid epicardial and endocardial ablation of atrial fibrillation: is ablation on two sides of the atrial wall better than one? J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Mar 25;4(3):e001893. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001893. No abstract available.
PMID: 25809549BACKGROUNDBeukema RJ, Adiyaman A, Smit JJ, Delnoy PP, Ramdat Misier AR, Elvan A. Catheter ablation of symptomatic postoperative atrial arrhythmias after epicardial surgical disconnection of the pulmonary veins and left atrial appendage ligation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49(1):265-71. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv047. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
PMID: 25721819BACKGROUNDPhan K, Phan S, Thiagalingam A, Medi C, Yan TD. Thoracoscopic surgical ablation versus catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Apr;49(4):1044-51. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv180. Epub 2015 May 23.
PMID: 26003961BACKGROUNDRichardson TD, Shoemaker MB, Whalen SP, Hoff SJ, Ellis CR. Staged versus Simultaneous Thoracoscopic Hybrid Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Does Not Affect Time to Recurrence of Atrial Arrhythmia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr;27(4):428-34. doi: 10.1111/jce.12906. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
PMID: 26725742BACKGROUNDCalkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ Jr, Davies DW, DiMarco J, Edgerton J, Ellenbogen K, Ezekowitz MD, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Hindricks G, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jalife J, Jais P, Kalman J, Keane D, Kim YH, Kirchhof P, Klein G, Kottkamp H, Kumagai K, Lindsay BD, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Packer DL, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ, Tsao HM, Wilber D. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Europace. 2012 Apr;14(4):528-606. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus027. Epub 2012 Mar 1. No abstract available.
PMID: 22389422BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Xin Zhou, MD
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2016
First Posted
November 18, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2019
Study Completion
October 1, 2019
Last Updated
June 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06