NCT03887728

Brief Summary

This study will measure the blood flow in the aa. uterinae in women, undergoing firstly ovarian stimulation for In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) / Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), in Hormonal Replacement cycles (HRT) and Natural cycles (NC) for Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
124

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 19, 2019

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 25, 2019

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 23, 2019

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 26, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 14, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 8, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

March 19, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 7, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

progesteroneendometriumblood flowestradiol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in the blood flow, calculated as Pulsatility Index (PI) and Resistance Index (RI), between the HRT- and the NC-FET cycles

    On the day of progesterone administration / progesterone rise. Quantitative continuous variable

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Continuous quantitative variable measured as the differences between average PI value

    1 day

  • Continuous quantitative variable measured as the differences between average RI value

    2 days

  • Thickness of the lining

    1 day

  • Number of days of estradiol exposure

    1 day

Study Arms (2)

Artificial (HRT) Cycles

1. Commence estradiol tablets (E2) 4mg from day 2 or 3 of period for 3 days 2. Increase E2 to 6mg on day 4 of E2 treatment, according to clinician discretion based on endometrial thickness. 3. Transvaginal scan throughout the HRT cycle to not only monitor endometrial development but to also exclude the presence of a dominant follicle on the ovaries. 4. Serial measurements of serum LH (luteinizing hormone), estradiol and progesterone levels. 5. Initial progesterone dose of 100mg at 22hrs (vaginal suppository) after ≥ 10 days and ≤ 16 days of estradiol administration when the minimal endometrial thickness achieved is 6mm with a trilaminar appearance. 6. Subsequently increase progesterone administration to 100mg vaginally three times daily. Continue E2 administration 6mg (3 tablets daily). Embryo transfer is scheduled 5 days following the initial initiation of progesterone

Spontaneous natural cycles

1. Day 2 of menses and throughout patients' natural cycle scans to monitor follicular growth. 2. Measurements of serum LH, estradiol and progesterone levels to determine ovulation. 3. The LH surge will be considered to have begun when the concentration rises by 180% above the most recent serum value and continues to rise thereafter (Irani et al. 2017, Fatemi et al., 2010). 4. Day 1 after the LH rise, a decrease in estradiol concentration is identified. Twenty four hours later progesterone concentrations rise with a level of greater than or equal to 1.5nmol /L confirming ovulation (day 0) (Irani et al., 2017; Speroff et al.). This is considered as day 0 with initiation of vaginal progesterone 100mg at 22hrs that night. The following day (day 1) the patient increases progesterone administration to 100mg vaginally 8 hourly and continues until 7 weeks gestation as per clinic protocol. Embryo transfer is scheduled 5 days (day 5) following confirmation of ovulation (day 0).

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients with primary / secondary infertility, who undergo an ovarian stimulation treatment for IVF/ICSI and subsequently are planned for FET with vitrified embryos, either as HRT-FET or as NC-FET

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who undergo ovarian stimulation in a Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormone (GnRH)-antagonist protocol for IVF / ICSI
  • Patients who have vitrified embryo(s)
  • Preparation for FET either in HRT or NC cycle

You may not qualify if:

  • Poor responder according to Bologna criteria (Ferraretti et al.) as follows:
  • At least two of the following three features must be present:
  • (i) Advanced maternal age (≥40 years) or any other risk factor for poor ovarian reserve (POR);
  • (ii) A previous POR (≤3 oocytes with a conventional stimulation protocol);
  • (iii) An abnormal ovarian reserve test (i.e. antral follicle count (AFC) 5-7 follicles or anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) 0.5 -1.1 ng/ml).
  • Uterine surgery for removal of fibroids (hysteroscopic, laparoscopic) or removal of uterine septum
  • Endometriosis
  • Asherman-Syndrome
  • Previous cytotoxic treatment
  • Previous radiation of the uterus / adnexal region
  • Known hypertension
  • Intake of Aspirin or similar medication which might influence the blood flow
  • Status after tubal ligation
  • Status after surgery in the adnexal region on 1 side

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

IVI Middle East Fertility Clinic

Abu Dhabi, 60202, United Arab Emirates

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Abdalla HI, Brooks AA, Johnson MR, Kirkland A, Thomas A, Studd JW. Endometrial thickness: a predictor of implantation in ovum recipients? Hum Reprod. 1994 Feb;9(2):363-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138509.

    PMID: 8027298BACKGROUND
  • Noyes N, Liu HC, Sultan K, Schattman G, Rosenwaks Z. Endometrial thickness appears to be a significant factor in embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1995 Apr;10(4):919-22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136061.

    PMID: 7650143BACKGROUND
  • Bakos O, Lundkvist O, Bergh T. Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of endometrial growth and texture in spontaneous ovulatory cycles--a descriptive study. Hum Reprod. 1993 Jun;8(6):799-806. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138145.

    PMID: 8345066BACKGROUND
  • Tekay A, Martikainen H, Jouppila P. Comparison of uterine blood flow characteristics between spontaneous and stimulated cycles before embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1996 Feb;11(2):364-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/11.2.364.

    PMID: 8671225BACKGROUND
  • Romero R. Giants in Obstetrics and Gynecology Series: A profile of Leon Speroff, MD. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):263.e1-263.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.056. Epub 2017 Jul 12. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28710912BACKGROUND
  • Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

    PMID: 21505041BACKGROUND
  • Irani M, Robles A, Gunnala V, Reichman D, Rosenwaks Z. Optimal parameters for determining the LH surge in natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfers. J Ovarian Res. 2017 Oct 16;10(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13048-017-0367-7.

  • Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

Study Officials

  • Barbara Lawrenz, PhD

    IVI RMA Abu Dhabi

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Scientific Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2019

First Posted

March 25, 2019

Study Start

April 23, 2019

Primary Completion

September 26, 2020

Study Completion

December 14, 2020

Last Updated

January 8, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations