Obesity, Lifestyle and Work Intervention
Does Adding A Work Intervention Into An Already Existing Life Style Intervention Improve Work Ability? A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
1 other identifier
interventional
140
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The main aim of this study was to examine whether introducing a work intervention into a traditional lifestyle rehabilitation program for persons with BMI above 30, would affect the participants' ability to work and their lifestyle change. The investigators wanted to find out how the participants experienced their health, workability and work capacity, quality of life, diet and self-efficacy before and during the intervention
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable obesity
Started Sep 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable obesity
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 3, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2019
CompletedMarch 22, 2019
March 1, 2019
3.3 years
March 14, 2019
March 21, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Full or partial return to work.
Mapping changes in work employability and work related factors with survey data from the ARR form (http://www.arbeidoghelse.no).
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Weight loss (kilograms)
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Return to work self-efficacy
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Quality of Life (15D), health-related quality of life
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Subjective somatic and psychological complaints
Data collected during the interventions, baseline, 6 and 12 months.
Vo2 peak
Data collected during the interventions, baseline and 12 months.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lifestyle and work intervention
EXPERIMENTALLifestyle intervention with work focus.
Lifestyle intervention
EXPERIMENTALLifestyle intervention without work focus.
Interventions
The intervention period lasted for a year with three institution-based stays, 4 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at 6 and 12 months. At baseline, participants got a functional assessment and an individual adjusted rehabilitation plan. At all three stages: The intervention contains activity training with a focus on the joy of movement, strength- and cardio-training. There were lectures and cognitive therapy to promote self-care and lifestyle change. The intervention contained lectures on diet, nutrition and cooking-classes. Participants set goals at baseline and adjusting these during the progress. Exercise programs was designed to use at home. The Cognitive Information Processing model of career guidance was the mainframe for the work dimension. All participants had talks with the work consultant at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Two work lectures, "Duties and rights as employees" and "Work as medicine". When needed the work consultant contacted the employer in order to facilitate changes.
The intervention period lasted for a year with three institution-based stay, 4 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at 6 and 12 months. At baseline, participants got a functional assessment and an individual adjusted rehabilitation plan. At all three stages: The intervention contains activity training with focus on joy of movement, strength- and cardio-training. There was lectures and cognitive therapy to promote self-care and lifestyle change. The intervention contained lectures on diet, nutrition and cooking-classes. Participants set goals at baseline and adjusting these during the progress. They developed exercise programs designed to use at home.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants with a Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 30 with or without comorbidity
You may not qualify if:
- People without a capacity to consent.
- People with severe alcohol and/or drug abuse.
- People with a major mental illness.
- Being pregnant.
- People with a health condition that contraindicates physical activity.
- People with or plan to apply for disability benefits.
- People with permanently adapted work.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Geir Ove Vegsund
Muritunet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Single blind masking
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2019
First Posted
March 22, 2019
Study Start
September 3, 2014
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
March 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Abstract and lecture: Nordic Conference in Work and Rehabilitation. Abstract and lecture: Work Disability Prevention and Integration Conference 2019 An article in BMC Public Health, 2019, qualitative results. An article, mixed methods results, 2019