Assessment of the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Sensors in People With Diabetes Undergoing Haemodialysis
ALPHA
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to assess the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 CGM system and the Abbott FreeStyle Libre flash system compared to the reference standard YSI (Yellow Spring Instruments) glucose in people with diabetes undergoing haemodialysis. The Dexcom G6 is a continuous glucose monitoring system that gives blood glucose values in real-time and includes alarms if the glucose is very low or high. The Abbott FreeStyle ibre flash system is an intermittent glucose monitor that shows the blood glucose values when it is waved near the sensor and does not include alarms. The YSI glucose analysis will take place as a normal part of haemodialysis, by testing blood glucose levels during the haemodialysis session. The study will last 28 days per participant
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 21, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 11, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2022
CompletedAugust 5, 2022
August 1, 2022
2.6 years
February 22, 2019
August 4, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
MARD between G6 and YSI
Mean absolute relative difference between Dexcom G6 and YSI glucose during haemodialysis
28 days
MARD between Libre and YSI
Mean absolute relative difference between Dexcom G6 and YSI glucose during haemodialysis
28 days
Secondary Outcomes (17)
HbA1c
28 days
MARD for G6 and YSI <3.9mmol/L
28 days
MARD for Libre and YSI <3.9mmol/L
28 days
MARD for Libre and YSI 3.9-10mmol/L
28 days
MARD for Libre and YSI >10mmol/L
28 days
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Dexcom G6 and Abbott Freestyle Libre
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will have a Dexcom G6 sensor and Abbott FreeStyle Libre sensor inserted in the abdomen and upper arm respectively. Participants will be asked to swipe the FreeStyle Libre reader across the sensor a minimum of every 8 hours. Participants will be asked to continue their usual regimen of self-monitoring capillary blood glucose (SMBG). During haemodialysis, a dialysis circuit blood sample will be drawn at 0 (pre-dialysis) 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210 and 240 minutes and immediately after dialysis. Samples from the circuit will be analysed on the YSI glucose analyser. Participants will be asked to change the FreeStyle Libre sensors at day 14. The blinded CGM data will be uploaded at the time of each sensor change by the research team.
Interventions
Dexcom G6 - continuous glucose monitoring device - blinded. CE mark 2018 Abbott Freestyle Libre - flash glucose monitoring device. CE mark 2014
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults \>18 years of age
- Diabetes, with insulin treatment for over 6 months or on sulphonylureas
- Chronic kidney disease requiring haemodialysis three times per week
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or planning pregnancy
- Breastfeeding
- Enrolled in other clinical trials
- Have active malignancy or under investigation for malignancy
- Severe visual impairment
- Reduced manual dexterity
- Unable to participate due to other factors, as assessed by the Chief Investigators
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Imperial College London/NHS trust Renal Unit
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (11)
Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, Manzi J, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Levey AS. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA. 2007 Nov 7;298(17):2038-47. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.17.2038.
PMID: 17986697BACKGROUNDLevin A. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease prior to dialysis. Semin Dial. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):101-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-139x.2003.16025.x.
PMID: 12641872BACKGROUNDCreme D, McCafferty K. Glycaemic Control Impact on Renal Endpoints in Diabetic Patients on Haemodialysis. Int J Nephrol. 2015;2015:523521. doi: 10.1155/2015/523521. Epub 2015 Sep 20.
PMID: 26457201BACKGROUNDNational Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes and CKD: 2012 Update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Nov;60(5):850-86. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.005.
PMID: 23067652BACKGROUNDHaviv YS, Sharkia M, Safadi R. Hypoglycemia in patients with renal failure. Ren Fail. 2000 Mar;22(2):219-23. doi: 10.1081/jdi-100100866.
PMID: 10803766BACKGROUNDLee KF, Szeto YT, Benzie IF. Glycohaemoglobin measurement: methodological differences in relation to interference by urea. Acta Diabetol. 2002 Apr;39(1):35-9. doi: 10.1007/s005920200010.
PMID: 12043937BACKGROUNDInaba M, Okuno S, Kumeda Y, Yamada S, Imanishi Y, Tabata T, Okamura M, Okada S, Yamakawa T, Ishimura E, Nishizawa Y; Osaka CKD Expert Research Group. Glycated albumin is a better glycemic indicator than glycated hemoglobin values in hemodialysis patients with diabetes: effect of anemia and erythropoietin injection. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Mar;18(3):896-903. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006070772. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
PMID: 17267743BACKGROUNDJoy MS, Cefalu WT, Hogan SL, Nachman PH. Long-term glycemic control measurements in diabetic patients receiving hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Feb;39(2):297-307. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.30549.
PMID: 11840370BACKGROUNDPickup JC, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ. Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ. 2011 Jul 7;343:d3805. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3805.
PMID: 21737469BACKGROUNDBeck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Bergenstal R, Haller S, Kollman C, Kruger D, McGill JB, Polonsky W, Toschi E, Wolpert H, Price D; DIAMOND Study Group. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):371-378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19975.
PMID: 28118453BACKGROUNDLind M, Polonsky W, Hirsch IB, Heise T, Bolinder J, Dahlqvist S, Schwarz E, Olafsdottir AF, Frid A, Wedel H, Ahlen E, Nystrom T, Hellman J. Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Conventional Therapy for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The GOLD Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):379-387. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19976.
PMID: 28118454BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nick Oliver
Imperial College London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Blinded CGM but not Libre
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2019
First Posted
March 21, 2019
Study Start
December 11, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2022
Study Completion
July 1, 2022
Last Updated
August 5, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share