Comparative User Experiences With BD Nano™ PRO 32G Extra Thin Wall Pen Needle vs the Terumo Nanopass® 34G Pen Needle
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a subject single blinded, block randomized, prospective, single-visit, multi-center study to compare user experiences with BD Nano™ PRO pen needle vs. the thinner commercially available Terumo Nanopass® pen needle. The study will include a minimum of 55 Japanese American study subjects with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable diabetes
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable diabetes
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 14, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 14, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 19, 2020
CompletedMay 19, 2020
May 1, 2020
4 months
March 14, 2019
October 31, 2019
May 6, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
BD Nano™ PRO Pen Needle Compared to Terumo Nanopass® (Injection Pain)
Injection pain as measured by a relative 150mm visual analog scale. Injection pain as measured by a relative visual analog scale. s. User preference is assessed through a single question reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the BD Nano™ PRO pen needle Pen labeled at +75 mm and the Comparator pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference forBD Nano™ PRO and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator. Scores from each of the paired injections (330 pairs for all participants) were pooled and a mean was calculated. The two-sided 95% confidence interval was calcuated for the average relative rating. A linear model was used to adjust for the order effect. If the lower bound of the 95% CI is \> -10cm, non-inferiority could be concluded. If the lower bound of the 95% CI is \>0, superiority can also be concluded.
Scores were collected immediately after each paired injection
Secondary Outcomes (3)
BD Nano™ PRO vs Terumo Nanopass® (Force)
Scores were collected immediately after each paired injection
BD Nano™ PRO vs Terumo Nanopass® (Needle Bending)
Immediately after injections were completed
BD Nano™ PRO vs Terumo Nanopass® (Leakage)
Immediately after injection
Other Outcomes (2)
Compare BD Nano™ PRO vs Terumo Nanopass® (Total Injection Time)
Immediately after injections were completed
Compare BD Nano™ PRO vs Terumo Nanopass® (Needle Breaking)
Immediately after injections were completed
Study Arms (2)
BD Nano™ PRO 32G pen needle
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are to perform 6 pairs of injections.
Terumo Nanopass® 34G pen needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants are to perform 6 pairs of injections.
Interventions
Insulin pen needle
Insulin pen needle
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Self-attesting Japanese American adults 18 to 75 years of age (inclusive).
- Self-attest to Japanese descent.
- Diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes.
- Self-injecting using an injection pen for ≥3 months with any pen needle.
- Injecting a minimum of ≥10 units of insulin and/or Victoza at least once per day.
- Able to demonstrate proficiency using an injection pen into an injection model.
- Able and willing to provide informed consent.
- Able and willing to complete all study procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Not self-injecting (for example injections completed by a family member).
- Self-injecting with a pen injector for less than 3 months.
- Unwilling to inject into abdomen.
- Unwilling to have hair at the injection area reduced with an electric razor if it is determined the hair will interfere with leakage evaluation.
- Failure to confirm which pen needle (gauge and needle length) subject is currently using. To confirm, subject may be asked to bring their pen and pen needles to the site or site staff may confirm via medical record or pharmacy.
- Pregnant (self-attestation).
- Currently taking anti-platelet or anticoagulant therapy (up to 162 mg per day of aspirin is permitted).
- History of a bleeding disorder.
- History of recurrent dermatological conditions or skin disorder (e.g., psoriasis, eczema).
- Gross skin anomalies and abnormalities located at or very close to the injection sites that would significantly limit available injection space.
- History of symptomatic low blood pressure or history of fainting (syncope) during hypodermic injections.
- Use of any analgesic medications within 24 hours of first study injection, and during the study (up to 162 mg per day of aspirin is permitted).
- A current or previous medical or physical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would place the patient at risk or make them unable to perform study procedures or has the potential to confound interpretation of the study results.
- Currently participating in another pen needle study.
- Employed by, or currently serving as a contractor or consultant to BD or any diabetes injectable medication, injection pen, or pen needle manufacturer.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Mills-Peninsula Medical Center Dorothy L. and James E Frank Diabetes Research Institute
San Mateo, California, 94401, United States
East West Medical Research Institute
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96814, United States
Related Publications (6)
Edwards CL, Fillingim RB, Keefe F. Race, ethnicity and pain. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):133-137. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00408-0.
PMID: 11690726BACKGROUNDWatson PJ, Latif RK, Rowbotham DJ. Ethnic differences in thermal pain responses: a comparison of South Asian and White British healthy males. Pain. 2005 Nov;118(1-2):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.010. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
PMID: 16202529BACKGROUNDPalmer B, Macfarlane G, Afzal C, Esmail A, Silman A, Lunt M. Acculturation and the prevalence of pain amongst South Asian minority ethnic groups in the UK. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Jun;46(6):1009-14. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem037. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
PMID: 17401133BACKGROUNDKomiyama O, Kawara M, De Laat A. Ethnic differences regarding tactile and pain thresholds in the trigeminal region. J Pain. 2007 Apr;8(4):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
PMID: 17275416BACKGROUNDHobara M. Beliefs about appropriate pain behavior: cross-cultural and sex differences between Japanese and Euro-Americans. Eur J Pain. 2005 Aug;9(4):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.09.006.
PMID: 15979019BACKGROUNDGibney MA, Fitz-Patrick D, Klonoff DC, Whooley S, Lu B, Yue W, Glezer S. User experiences with second-generation 32-gauge x 4 mm vs. thinner comparator pen needles: prospective randomized trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Oct;36(10):1591-1600. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1803248. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
PMID: 32723109DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Gibney
- Organization
- Becton Dickinson
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Participants will not see any labeling for the pen needles used for injections
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2019
First Posted
March 18, 2019
Study Start
February 11, 2019
Primary Completion
June 14, 2019
Study Completion
June 14, 2019
Last Updated
May 19, 2020
Results First Posted
May 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share