NCT03878745

Brief Summary

This is a subject single blinded, block randomized, prospective, single-visit, multi-center study to compare user experiences with BD Nano™ PRO pen needle vs. the thinner commercially available Terumo Nanopass® pen needle. The study will include a minimum of 55 Japanese American study subjects with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
55

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable diabetes

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable diabetes

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 11, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 14, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 18, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 14, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 14, 2019

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 19, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 19, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 14, 2019

Results QC Date

October 31, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • BD Nano™ PRO Pen Needle Compared to Terumo Nanopass® (Injection Pain)

    Injection pain as measured by a relative 150mm visual analog scale. Injection pain as measured by a relative visual analog scale. s. User preference is assessed through a single question reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the BD Nano™ PRO pen needle Pen labeled at +75 mm and the Comparator pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference forBD Nano™ PRO and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator. Scores from each of the paired injections (330 pairs for all participants) were pooled and a mean was calculated. The two-sided 95% confidence interval was calcuated for the average relative rating. A linear model was used to adjust for the order effect. If the lower bound of the 95% CI is \> -10cm, non-inferiority could be concluded. If the lower bound of the 95% CI is \>0, superiority can also be concluded.

    Scores were collected immediately after each paired injection

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • BD Nano™ PRO vs Terumo Nanopass® (Force)

    Scores were collected immediately after each paired injection

  • BD Nano™ PRO vs Terumo Nanopass® (Needle Bending)

    Immediately after injections were completed

  • BD Nano™ PRO vs Terumo Nanopass® (Leakage)

    Immediately after injection

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Compare BD Nano™ PRO vs Terumo Nanopass® (Total Injection Time)

    Immediately after injections were completed

  • Compare BD Nano™ PRO vs Terumo Nanopass® (Needle Breaking)

    Immediately after injections were completed

Study Arms (2)

BD Nano™ PRO 32G pen needle

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants are to perform 6 pairs of injections.

Device: Terumo Nanopass® 34G pen needleDevice: BD Nano™ PRO 32G pen needle

Terumo Nanopass® 34G pen needle

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants are to perform 6 pairs of injections.

Device: Terumo Nanopass® 34G pen needleDevice: BD Nano™ PRO 32G pen needle

Interventions

Insulin pen needle

BD Nano™ PRO 32G pen needleTerumo Nanopass® 34G pen needle

Insulin pen needle

BD Nano™ PRO 32G pen needleTerumo Nanopass® 34G pen needle

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Self-attesting Japanese American adults 18 to 75 years of age (inclusive).
  • Self-attest to Japanese descent.
  • Diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes.
  • Self-injecting using an injection pen for ≥3 months with any pen needle.
  • Injecting a minimum of ≥10 units of insulin and/or Victoza at least once per day.
  • Able to demonstrate proficiency using an injection pen into an injection model.
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent.
  • Able and willing to complete all study procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • Not self-injecting (for example injections completed by a family member).
  • Self-injecting with a pen injector for less than 3 months.
  • Unwilling to inject into abdomen.
  • Unwilling to have hair at the injection area reduced with an electric razor if it is determined the hair will interfere with leakage evaluation.
  • Failure to confirm which pen needle (gauge and needle length) subject is currently using. To confirm, subject may be asked to bring their pen and pen needles to the site or site staff may confirm via medical record or pharmacy.
  • Pregnant (self-attestation).
  • Currently taking anti-platelet or anticoagulant therapy (up to 162 mg per day of aspirin is permitted).
  • History of a bleeding disorder.
  • History of recurrent dermatological conditions or skin disorder (e.g., psoriasis, eczema).
  • Gross skin anomalies and abnormalities located at or very close to the injection sites that would significantly limit available injection space.
  • History of symptomatic low blood pressure or history of fainting (syncope) during hypodermic injections.
  • Use of any analgesic medications within 24 hours of first study injection, and during the study (up to 162 mg per day of aspirin is permitted).
  • A current or previous medical or physical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would place the patient at risk or make them unable to perform study procedures or has the potential to confound interpretation of the study results.
  • Currently participating in another pen needle study.
  • Employed by, or currently serving as a contractor or consultant to BD or any diabetes injectable medication, injection pen, or pen needle manufacturer.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Mills-Peninsula Medical Center Dorothy L. and James E Frank Diabetes Research Institute

San Mateo, California, 94401, United States

Location

East West Medical Research Institute

Honolulu, Hawaii, 96814, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Edwards CL, Fillingim RB, Keefe F. Race, ethnicity and pain. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):133-137. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00408-0.

    PMID: 11690726BACKGROUND
  • Watson PJ, Latif RK, Rowbotham DJ. Ethnic differences in thermal pain responses: a comparison of South Asian and White British healthy males. Pain. 2005 Nov;118(1-2):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.010. Epub 2005 Oct 3.

    PMID: 16202529BACKGROUND
  • Palmer B, Macfarlane G, Afzal C, Esmail A, Silman A, Lunt M. Acculturation and the prevalence of pain amongst South Asian minority ethnic groups in the UK. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Jun;46(6):1009-14. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem037. Epub 2007 Mar 31.

    PMID: 17401133BACKGROUND
  • Komiyama O, Kawara M, De Laat A. Ethnic differences regarding tactile and pain thresholds in the trigeminal region. J Pain. 2007 Apr;8(4):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Feb 1.

    PMID: 17275416BACKGROUND
  • Hobara M. Beliefs about appropriate pain behavior: cross-cultural and sex differences between Japanese and Euro-Americans. Eur J Pain. 2005 Aug;9(4):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.09.006.

    PMID: 15979019BACKGROUND
  • Gibney MA, Fitz-Patrick D, Klonoff DC, Whooley S, Lu B, Yue W, Glezer S. User experiences with second-generation 32-gauge x 4 mm vs. thinner comparator pen needles: prospective randomized trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Oct;36(10):1591-1600. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1803248. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Michael Gibney
Organization
Becton Dickinson

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Participants will not see any labeling for the pen needles used for injections
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: BD Nano™PRO (Test Device) will be compared to the Terumo Nanopass® through a series of randomized abdominal saline injections
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2019

First Posted

March 18, 2019

Study Start

February 11, 2019

Primary Completion

June 14, 2019

Study Completion

June 14, 2019

Last Updated

May 19, 2020

Results First Posted

May 19, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations