Evaluation of a Non-invasive Sensory Feedback System in Hand Prostheses
1 other identifier
interventional
7
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Implication and evaluation of a non-invasive sensory feedback system in hand prostheses in everyday life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2019
CompletedMarch 15, 2019
March 1, 2019
3.8 years
March 11, 2019
March 13, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Assessment of Myoelectric Control - ACMC
An observational assessment where you rate the subjects' capacity of myoelectric control in a bimanual activity. The scoring was made by an experienced external rater.
2 days
Task performance questionnaire
21 questions about sensory feedback from the prosthesis, agency, body ownership, performance in activity and phantom limb pain. Self-administered estimation on a 7 grade Likert-scale.
2 days
Pointing task
A objective measurement of body ownership. The subject are asked to mark on a ruler, with the hand prosthesis hidden, where they estimate the location of the prosthetic index finger.
2 days
Study Arms (1)
sensory feedback
EXPERIMENTALA non-invasive air-mediated sensory feedback system embedded in the prosthesis socket. Group description: Individuals with acquired forearm amputation.
Interventions
The sensory feedback system used was a simple non-invasive, non-electronic system based on air-mediated pressure. A silicone glove with bulbs (35 mm in length) volar in every fingertip was made and applied on a VariPlus Speed hand (OttoBock), size 7¾. The sensory feedback system was embedded in the prosthetic socket.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- acquired forearm amputation
You may not qualify if:
- psychiatric disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Wijk U, Carlsson IK, Antfolk C, Bjorkman A, Rosen B. Sensory Feedback in Hand Prostheses: A Prospective Study of Everyday Use. Front Neurosci. 2020 Jul 7;14:663. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00663. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32733187DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2019
First Posted
March 15, 2019
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 31, 2019
Study Completion
January 31, 2019
Last Updated
March 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share