Study Stopped
Problems unique to COVID-19, incomplete data due to a high rate of dropout to minimize non-essential appointments and difficult subject recruitment
Comparing Preoperative Injection of Mitomycin-C vs. Intraoperative Injection of Mitomycin-C vs. Topical Application of Mitomycin-C (Conventional Use) in Trabeculectomy
A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Three Delivery Methods of Mitomycin-C for Trabeculectomy Surgery: Preoperative Subconjunctival Injection, Intraoperative Subconjunctival Injection, and Topical Application (Conventional Use) During Trabeculectomy Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
4
Brief Summary
In this Pilot explorative study, the investigators are going to estimate and compare the outcomes of three different delivery methods of MMC for Trabeculectomy: a subconjunctival injection of MMC 0.002% at the site of future Trabeculectomy two to four weeks before the surgery, a subconjunctival injection of MMC 0.01% intraoperatively and topical sponge applied MMC 0.02% intraoperatively (typical use) in patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma who did not have any filtering surgeries before. After obtaining informed consent from the patients, the patients are randomly divided into three groups via a block randomization method: Group A receives 0.1 mL MMC 0.002 % (0.1mL MMC 0.02mg/mL) subconjunctival injection preoperatively in superior conjunctiva at the site of future Trabeculectomy surgery. Group B receives 0.1mL MMC 0.01% subconjunctival injection intraoperatively at the site of Trabeculectomy and Group C receives conventional sponge delivery of MMC 0.02% intraoperatively. To avoid observer bias during postoperative evaluation of results, IOP staff obtaining measurements of IOP will be masked to the randomization allocation. All groups undergo conventional Trabeculectomy surgery (fornix-based) as scheduled, and the same routine follow up and post-op regimen will be scheduled for all three groups. Patients are routinely visited in the clinic at first day postoperatively, one week (+/-2 days), one month (+/-1 week), three months (+/-2 weeks), six months (+/-3 weeks) and finally at one year (+/-(4 weeks)). In each of these visits we will be assessing: Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, number and type of glaucoma medication, slit lamp examination of the anterior segment and fundus examination.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_4
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 5, 2024
CompletedJanuary 5, 2024
January 1, 2024
3.8 years
March 13, 2019
August 16, 2023
January 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
IOP - 1 Day Postop
Mean IOP at 1 day post-operatively
1 day
IOP - 1 Week Postop
Mean IOP at 1 week postop
1 week
IOP - 1 Month Postop
Mean IOP 1 month postoperatively
1 month
IOP - 3 Months Postop
Mean IOP 3 months postoperatively
3 months
IOP - 6 Months Postop
Mean IOP 6 months postoperatively
6 months
IOP - 12 Months Postop
Mean IOP 12 months postoperatively
12 months
Study Arms (3)
Preoperative Subconjunctival injection of MMC
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubconjunctival injection of 0.1 ml of Mitomycin-C 0.002% at the site of future trabeculectomy surgery (2 - 4 weeks preoperatively).
Intraoperative subconjunctival injection of MMC
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntraoperative subjconjunctival injection of 0.1 mL of Mitomycin-C 0.01% (0.1mg/mL) to the site of trabeculectomy
Intraoperative topical application of MMC
ACTIVE COMPARATORTopical application of Mitomycin-C intraoperatively by applying a sponge soaked in 1mL of Mitomycin-C 0.02 mg/mL for 1 minute to the site of trabeculectomy
Interventions
Three delivery methods of Mitomycin-C in Trabeculectomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 20 - 85 years
- Willingness to participate in the study by signing informed consent
- Primary open angle glaucoma (including pigmentary glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma) indicated with open angles upon previous gonioscopy and demonstrative optic nerve and visual field damage
- Trabeculectomy needed as treatment as determined by the care provider
You may not qualify if:
- Patient unwilling or unable to give informed consent, unwilling to accept randomization, or unable to return for scheduled study visits throughout the duration of the study (1 year)
- Any secondary cause of glaucoma, or angle closure shown on gonioscopy
- Any ocular or neurological problems with optic nerve or visual field defect (ie. retinal disease, post trauma, corneal scar) that may confound the interpretation of glaucoma such as visual field or optic nerve interpretation
- Pregnant women, nursing women, and/or anyone with a history of allergy to MMC
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Doheny Eye Center UCLA (Arcadia)
Arcadia, California, 91007, United States
Doheny Eye Center UCLA (Fountain Valley)
Fountain Valley, California, 92708, United States
Stein Eye Institute - UCLA (Westwood)
Los Angeles, California, 90049, United States
Doheny Eye Center UCLA (Pasadena)
Pasadena, California, 91105, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
COVID-19 pandemic occurred during study meaning high rates of patients lost to follow-up, as non-emergent visits were canceled or postponed. This led to early termination which means we had a small number of subjects to analyze, especially those who completed all 12 months of follow-up. By the time pandemic restrictions eased, several other studies had published results on similar trials, making further enrollment unnecessary and further supporting early termination of the study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Joseph Caprioli
- Organization
- UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Distinguished Professor of Ophthalmology and David May II Chair in Ophthalmology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2019
First Posted
March 15, 2019
Study Start
March 30, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
January 5, 2024
Results First Posted
January 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01