Neoadjuvant Short-term Intensive Chemoresection Versus Standard Adjuvant Intravesical Instillations in NMIBC
NICSA
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized controlled trial aiming to investigate neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection with Mitomycin C compared to standard treatment with TURB and adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy in patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Nov 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedMarch 3, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.6 years
November 13, 2017
March 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
2-year recurrence rate
The primary outcome is the number of patients in need for a TURB or tumour fulguration in the first 2 years following randomization. TURBs included as primary endpoint are the initial TURB in the control group, the prospective TURB in the intervention group for patients without complete chemoresection as well as TURB due to recurrence in both study groups. In case a TURB is recommended, but a subject refuses to undergo surgery, the recommended TURB is also registered.
within 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Tumour response rate
6 months after complete enrollment
5-year recurrence rate
within 5 years
Adverse events
6 months after complete enrollment
Biomarkers
within 2 years
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALNeoadjuvant Mitomycin C
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORAdjuvant Mitomycin C
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Known history of urothelial non-invasive Ta-tumour low-grade or high-grade.
- ≥18 years old
- Mentally healthy individual
- The ability to understand Danish orally and in writing
You may not qualify if:
- Known history of invasive tumour of the bladder (T1+)
- Known history of CIS of the bladder
- Previous BCG-treatment within the last 24 months
- Previous Mitomycin C-treatment (except single-shot postoperative instillation)
- Known allergy or intolerance to Mitomycin C
- Solid tumour with suspicions of invasion
- Single tumour of more than 2 cm in diameter
- Suspicion of CIS (positive cytology with high-grade neoplastic cells combined with suspicious cystoscopy for flat lesions).
- Small bladder volume (less than 100 ml) or incontinence
- Acute cystitis
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Not willing to use secure contraception with regard to men with partners and premenopausal women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
Related Publications (15)
Herr H. Re: Marko Babjuk, Andreas Bohle, Maximilian Burger, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol 2017;71:447-61. Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):e171-e172. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.030. Epub 2016 Dec 12. No abstract available.
PMID: 27979427BACKGROUNDMaffezzini M. Re: Richard J. Sylvester, Adrian P.M. van der Meijden, Willem Oosterlinck, J. Alfred Witjes, Christian Bouffioux, Louis Denis and Donald W.W. Newling. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 2006;49:466-77. Eur Urol. 2006 Sep;50(3):623-4; author reply 624-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 May 4. No abstract available.
PMID: 16707208BACKGROUNDKaasinen E, Wijkstrom H, Rintala E, Mestad O, Jahnson S, Malmstrom PU. Seventeen-year follow-up of the prospective randomized Nordic CIS study: BCG monotherapy versus alternating therapy with mitomycin C and BCG in patients with carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder. Scand J Urol. 2016 Oct;50(5):360-8. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1210672. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
PMID: 27603424BACKGROUNDLamm DL. Preventing progression and improving survival with BCG maintenance. Eur Urol. 2000;37 Suppl 1:9-15. doi: 10.1159/000052376.
PMID: 10575266BACKGROUNDShelley MD, Wilt TJ, Court J, Coles B, Kynaston H, Mason MD. Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin is superior to mitomycin C in reducing tumour recurrence in high-risk superficial bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. BJU Int. 2004 Mar;93(4):485-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04655.x.
PMID: 15008714BACKGROUNDShida K, Shimasaki J, Takahashi H, Kurihara H, Sato J. [Therapy and prognosis of bladder tumors--result of injection of mitomycin C into the bladder]. Gan No Rinsho. 1970 Jul;16(7):737-44. No abstract available. Japanese.
PMID: 5465489BACKGROUNDColombo R, Rocchini L, Suardi N, Benigni F, Colciago G, Bettiga A, Pellucchi F, Maccagnano C, Briganti A, Salonia A, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Neoadjuvant short-term intensive intravesical mitomycin C regimen compared with weekly schedule for low-grade recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: preliminary results of a randomised phase 2 study. Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):797-802. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.032. Epub 2012 May 18.
PMID: 22633362BACKGROUNDSousa A, Inman BA, Pineiro I, Monserrat V, Perez A, Aparici V, Gomez I, Neira P, Uribarri C. A clinical trial of neoadjuvant hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) for treating intermediate and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Int J Hyperthermia. 2014 May;30(3):166-70. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.900194. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
PMID: 24697672BACKGROUNDMiyata Y, Sakai H. Predictive Markers for the Recurrence of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Intravesical Therapy. Dis Markers. 2015;2015:857416. doi: 10.1155/2015/857416. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
PMID: 26681820BACKGROUNDSeo HK, Cho KS, Chung J, Joung JY, Park WS, Chung MK, Lee KH. Prognostic value of p53 and Ki-67 expression in intermediate-risk patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer receiving adjuvant intravesical mitomycin C therapy. Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):512.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.040. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
PMID: 20579709BACKGROUNDChen JX, Deng N, Chen X, Chen LW, Qiu SP, Li XF, Li JP. A novel molecular grading model: combination of Ki67 and VEGF in predicting tumor recurrence and progression in non-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(5):2229-34. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.5.2229.
PMID: 22901199BACKGROUNDKaram JA, Lotan Y, Ashfaq R, Sagalowsky AI, Shariat SF. Survivin expression in patients with non-muscle-invasive urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. Urology. 2007 Sep;70(3):482-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.05.009.
PMID: 17905101BACKGROUNDBracci L, Schiavoni G, Sistigu A, Belardelli F. Immune-based mechanisms of cytotoxic chemotherapy: implications for the design of novel and rationale-based combined treatments against cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2014 Jan;21(1):15-25. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2013.67. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
PMID: 23787994BACKGROUNDHugo W, Zaretsky JM, Sun L, Song C, Moreno BH, Hu-Lieskovan S, Berent-Maoz B, Pang J, Chmielowski B, Cherry G, Seja E, Lomeli S, Kong X, Kelley MC, Sosman JA, Johnson DB, Ribas A, Lo RS. Genomic and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma. Cell. 2017 Jan 26;168(3):542. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.010. No abstract available.
PMID: 28129544BACKGROUNDLindgren MS, Hansen E, Azawi N, Nielsen AM, Dyrskjot L, Jensen JB. DaBlaCa-13 Study: Oncological Outcome of Short-Term, Intensive Chemoresection With Mitomycin in Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Primary Outcome of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):206-211. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00470. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
PMID: 36223555DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen, MD
Aarhus University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2017
First Posted
November 21, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 11, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
March 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share