Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Surgeries Anaesthetized With Propofol and Inhalational Anaesthetics
1 other identifier
observational
3,922
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Propofol used as anaesthesia in surgery had shown small postoperative analgesic benefits over inhalational anaesthetics in some meta-analyses. It was also associated with reduced risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Small sample of studies together with high heterogeneity prevented some meta-analyses to confirm propofol's effect for postoperative morphine consumption and other outcomes. Acute Pain Service data bank can provide an alternative way of evaluating postoperative outcomes of propofol anaesthetics through supplying a very large sample size in a more homogeneous setting. Retrospective study comparing propofol and inhalational anaesthetics on postoperative pain matched on patients' demographic and clinical data had been done for liver surgery. Propofol's benefits for postoperative pain and morphine consumption was confirmed but not for adverse effects. This study plans to analyze the postoperative outcome data from an Acute Pain Service data bank in years 2015-17 to compare the anaesthetics of propofol and inhalational anaesthetics. Comprehensive regression adjustment for confounders are performed using all available patients' demographic, clinical and anaesthetic data. All major surgery types are included. Results will provide postoperative outcome differences between propofol and inhalational anaesthetics for all surgeries and for specific type of surgeries. The large sample bank will provide higher probability for detecting outcome difference between the anaesthetics for all the major surgical types.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 12, 2019
CompletedMay 10, 2023
May 1, 2023
6 months
March 13, 2019
May 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pain score
NRS (0-10) for both rest and moving
up to postoperative day 3
Secondary Outcomes (2)
analgesic consumption
up to postoperative day 3
Amount of patients with adverse events in post-operation
up to postoperative day 3
Study Arms (2)
Group propofol
Patients who had surgeries and were anaesthetized with propofol at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from Jan 2015 to Dec 2017
Group inhalation anaesthetics
Patients who had surgeries and were anaesthetized via inhalation at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from Jan 2015 to Dec 2017
Interventions
Patients who had surgeries and were anaesthetized with propofol at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from Jan 2015 to Dec 2017
Patients who had surgeries and were anaesthetized via inhalation at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from Jan 2015 to Dec 2017
Eligibility Criteria
Surgical and anaesthetic data in years 2015-17 from the Acute Pain Service records of Queen Mary Hospital are included for analysis. Available data are about 6000 surgical cases. Only general anaesthesia by propofol or inhalational anaesthetics are included.
You may qualify if:
- Postoperative outcomes from Acute Pain Service data bank between Jan 2015 and Dec 2017 in Queen Mary Hospital would be retrieved;
- Surgeries with general anaesthesia by either propofol or inhalational anaesthetics.
You may not qualify if:
- Essential data missed;
- Surgical types with small sample size below 30 for the data collection period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (5)
Qiu Q, Choi SW, Wong SS, Irwin MG, Cheung CW. Effects of intra-operative maintenance of general anaesthesia with propofol on postoperative pain outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2016 Oct;71(10):1222-33. doi: 10.1111/anae.13578. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
PMID: 27506326BACKGROUNDPeng K, Liu HY, Wu SR, Liu H, Zhang ZC, Ji FH. Does Propofol Anesthesia Lead to Less Postoperative Pain Compared With Inhalational Anesthesia?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):846-58. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001504.
PMID: 27636574BACKGROUNDKumar G, Stendall C, Mistry R, Gurusamy K, Walker D. A comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol with sevoflurane or desflurane in ambulatory surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2014 Oct;69(10):1138-50. doi: 10.1111/anae.12713. Epub 2014 May 22.
PMID: 24847783BACKGROUNDChan AC, Qiu Q, Choi SW, Wong SS, Chan AC, Irwin MG, Cheung CW. Effects of Intra-Operative Total Intravenous Anaesthesia with Propofol versus Inhalational Anaesthesia with Sevoflurane on Post-Operative Pain in Liver Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149753. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26901037BACKGROUNDWong SSC, Choi EKY, Chan WS, Cheung CW. Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 10;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01683-9.
PMID: 35538421DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stanley SC Wong, MBBS
The University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2019
First Posted
March 15, 2019
Study Start
February 11, 2019
Primary Completion
August 12, 2019
Study Completion
August 12, 2019
Last Updated
May 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share