NCT03874650

Brief Summary

Low mood and depression are common following acquired brain injury (ABI). There is a lack evidence on effective treatments in ABI. Behavioural Activation (BA) is a potentially valuable option. People with low mood can have problems imagining, planning and engaging in positive activities, or avoid activities due to fear of negative consequences. This can reduce positive reinforcement, further lowering mood. BA aims to reverse this cycle by encouraging individuals to engage in enjoyable activities. Despite its simplicity, it has been as effective as "talking therapies" and mood medication in non-ABI populations. Its simplicity may be particularly helpful in ABI where cognitive problems can form additional barriers to activity engagement. This study will examine two ways to increase activity levels and improve mood. The first (Activity Engagement Group) is a social group run once a week for 8 weeks in which ABI participants will be encouraged to engage in games, crafts and discussion. The aim is that members gain direct positive reinforcement and may challenge fears such that activity levels could be maintained and mood enhanced after the group ends. The second approach (Activity Planning Group), again an 8-week group, is to help participants identify, plan and schedule positive activities. The group will include discussion on identifying and overcoming problems in planning activities. Again, the hope is that training skills in planning and scheduling will generalise beyond the group. The primary purpose is to examine the practicality, feasibility, and acceptability of the two approaches in ABI. A secondary purpose is to evaluate whether either group leads to improvements in activity levels and mood compared to a waitlist group. Individuals will be randomised to the Activity Engagement, Activity Planning Group or the 8-week Waitlist group. All will complete measures of activity levels and mood. At the end of the groups, these measures will be repeated. Waitlist participants will then be re-randomised to either the Activity Engagement Group or the Activity Planning Group. Recruitment rates, drop out rates, and exit interviews will be used to assess feasibility and how meaningful or valuable participants found the groups. Comparison of measures will provide some indication of whether the groups are associated with improvements compared to those waitlisted. To establish whether any benefits last, all participants will repeat the measures 1 month after the groups end.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 12, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 14, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 20, 2019

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 27, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 27, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 4, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

March 12, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 3, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

acquired brain injurytraumatic brain injurydepressionrehabilitationexecutive function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Behavioural Activation for Depression Scale (BADS; Kanter et al., 2007)

    This measure assesses changes in activity level related to depression. It consists of four subscales, Activation (engaging in meaningful activities) and Avoidance/Rumination (avoiding meaningful activities), Work/School impairment, and Social Impairment. To score the BADS, items from all scales other than the Activation scale are reverse-coded and then all items are summed. To score the subscales, no items are reverse-coded. For the total scale, higher scores represent increased activation, while for the Social Impairment subscale, higher scores represent increased social impairment. The minimum possible score on the BADS is 0, while the maximum possible is 150.

    Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)

    Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention

  • Behavioural Inhibition/Behavioural Activation Scales (BIS/BAS; Carver & White 1994)

    Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention

  • Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-Short Form (IUS-SF; Carleton, Norton, & Asmundson)

    Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention

  • Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R, Weiss, 2007)

    Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention

  • Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Motivation Questionnaire-Self (BMQ-S)

    Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Activity Planning Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Those in the Activity Planning group receive training and practice in identifying realistic and safe activities in everyday life that may be enjoyable or rewarding to complete. They gain practice in scheduling activities and identifying and overcoming barriers to completion, such as memory problems, avoidance, sticking to habitual patterns and physical and transport issues. The intervention will consist of weekly 1 hour group sessions over 8 weeks, as below: Introduction to Group Therapy Identifying Enjoyable Activities The Automatic Pilot and Planning Pleasurable Activities Goal Review and Balancing Enjoyable and Routine Activities Identifying Solutions to Goal Attainment Increasing Mastery and Managing Fatigue Active Approaches to Engagement Relapse Prevention

Behavioral: Activity Planning Group

Activity Engagement Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Individuals randomised to this arm will meet weekly for 8 weeks for 1 hour and engage in various potentially rewarding and meaningful social activities such as board games, crafting, and puzzles. Participants in this group will not receive specific training on activity scheduling or overcoming barriers to activity participation. Rather the aim is that participants gain experience of positive reinforcement from the activities and that this explicitly or implicitly challenges potentially negative predictions about such situations and encourages generalised increases in positive activity beyond the group setting. The group will cover activities such as board games, t-shirt making, puzzles, painting, "pub quizzes", figurine painting, origami/paper-craft, and clay sculptures.

Behavioral: Activity Engagement Group

Waitlist Group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

In consenting to the study, individuals understand that access to groups cannot always be immediate. In the design we take advantage of this by completing the outcome measures before and after an 8-week period in participants randomized to this condition. We do not ask participants in any condition to discontinue any clinical services that they currently receive, hence the waitlist forms a treatment as usual control arm against which to judge and effects of the two groups. At the end of the waitlist the participants will be invited to take part in the Activity Planning or Activity Engagement Group depending upon their initial randomisation..

Behavioral: Waitlist Group

Interventions

Participants in this group will receive 8 1-hour sessions of Behavioural Activation combined with select Goal Management Training strategies over the course of 8 weeks.

Activity Planning Group

Participants in this group will attend 8 1-hour sessions of various social activities such as board games and puzzles.

Activity Engagement Group
Waitlist GroupBEHAVIORAL

Participants in this group will continue on their care as usual before being re-randomised into either the Activity Planning Group or Activity Engagement Group after 8 weeks.

Waitlist Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Have a diagnosis of an acquired brain injury (e.g., traumatic brain injury, stroke)
  • Speak and comprehend English
  • Are a minimum of 3 months post-acquired brain injury
  • Are identified as having low mood. Low mood will be identified by either:
  • A score of at least 7 on the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, indicating clinically significant levels of depression, or
  • Clinicians have identified that a client has low mood (i.e., through their own administration of the HADS within the past 3 months, through clinical interview determining that the client has low mood or would benefit emotionally from increased activity level)

You may not qualify if:

  • Are incapable of attending to and/or understanding the intervention materials (i.e., severe cognitive disability)
  • Have a diagnosis of dementia or other neurodegenerative disorder
  • Unstable psychotropic medication (i.e., have recently started/recently changed medications)
  • Are actively suicidal (i.e., have attempted suicide in the past 3 months, currently self-harm, and/or have a concrete plan to attempt suicide in the future, as identified by recurring clinician)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Cambridgeshire Community Services

Cambridge, Cambs, CB4 1PX, United Kingdom

Location

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust

Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (27)

  • Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):459-81. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200411000-00004.

    PMID: 15602309BACKGROUND
  • Carleton RN, Norton MA, Asmundson GJ. Fearing the unknown: a short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(1):105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 May 2.

    PMID: 16647833BACKGROUND
  • Carver CS, White TL. Behavioural inhibition, behavioural activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol, 67, 319-333, 1994.

    BACKGROUND
  • Cattelani R, Zettin M, Zoccolotti P. Rehabilitation treatments for adults with behavioral and psychosocial disorders following acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2010 Mar;20(1):52-85. doi: 10.1007/s11065-009-9125-y. Epub 2010 Feb 9.

    PMID: 20143264BACKGROUND
  • Dimidjian S, Hollon SD, Dobson KS, Schmaling KB, Kohlenberg RJ, Addis ME, Gallop R, McGlinchey JB, Markley DK, Gollan JK, Atkins DC, Dunner DL, Jacobson NS. Randomized trial of behavioral activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Aug;74(4):658-70. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.658.

    PMID: 16881773BACKGROUND
  • Fazel S, Wolf A, Pillas D, Lichtenstein P, Langstrom N. Suicide, fatal injuries, and other causes of premature mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: a 41-year Swedish population study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;71(3):326-33. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.3935.

    PMID: 24430827BACKGROUND
  • Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(5):341-53.

    PMID: 18162698BACKGROUND
  • Jorge RE, Robinson RG, Moser D, Tateno A, Crespo-Facorro B, Arndt S. Major depression following traumatic brain injury. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;61(1):42-50. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.1.42.

    PMID: 14706943BACKGROUND
  • Kanter JW, Manos RC, Bowe WM, Baruch DE, Busch AM, Rusch LC. What is behavioral activation? A review of the empirical literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;30(6):608-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.001.

    PMID: 20677369BACKGROUND
  • Raes F, Hoes D, Van Gucht D, Kanter JW, Hermans D. The Dutch version of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS): psychometric properties and factor structure. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;41(3):246-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

    PMID: 20167307BACKGROUND
  • Lachman ME, Weaver SL. Sociodemographic variations in the sense of control by domain: findings from the MacArthur studies of midlife. Psychol Aging. 1998 Dec;13(4):553-62. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.13.4.553.

    PMID: 9883456BACKGROUND
  • Lachman ME, Weaver SL. The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Mar;74(3):763-73. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.763.

    PMID: 9523418BACKGROUND
  • Levine B, Robertson IH, Clare L, Carter G, Hong J, Wilson BA, Duncan J, Stuss DT. Rehabilitation of executive functioning: an experimental-clinical validation of goal management training. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000 Mar;6(3):299-312. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700633052.

    PMID: 10824502BACKGROUND
  • Levine B, Schweizer TA, O'Connor C, Turner G, Gillingham S, Stuss DT, Manly T, Robertson IH. Rehabilitation of executive functioning in patients with frontal lobe brain damage with goal management training. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Feb 17;5:9. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00009. eCollection 2011.

    PMID: 21369362BACKGROUND
  • Mazzucchelli T, Kane R, Rees CS. Behavioural activation treatments for depression in adults: A meta-analysis and review. Clin Psychol-Sci Pr 16(4): 383-411, 2009.

    BACKGROUND
  • McDonald S, Tate R, Togher L, Bornhofen C, Long E, Gertler P, Bowen R. Social skills treatment for people with severe, chronic acquired brain injuries: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;89(9):1648-59. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.029.

    PMID: 18760150BACKGROUND
  • Medley AR, Powell T. Motivational Interviewing to promote self-awareness and engagement in rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: A conceptual review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010 Aug;20(4):481-508. doi: 10.1080/09602010903529610. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

    PMID: 20182952BACKGROUND
  • Oddy M, Cattran C, Wood R. The development of a measure of motivational changes following acquired brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008 Jul;30(5):568-75. doi: 10.1080/13803390701555598.

    PMID: 18569252BACKGROUND
  • Richards DA, Ekers D, McMillan D, Taylor RS, Byford S, Warren FC, Barrett B, Farrand PA, Gilbody S, Kuyken W, O'Mahen H, Watkins ER, Wright KA, Hollon SD, Reed N, Rhodes S, Fletcher E, Finning K. Cost and Outcome of Behavioural Activation versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression (COBRA): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016 Aug 27;388(10047):871-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31140-0. Epub 2016 Jul 23.

    PMID: 27461440BACKGROUND
  • Roozenbeek B, Maas AI, Menon DK. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Apr;9(4):231-6. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.22. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

    PMID: 23443846BACKGROUND
  • Teasell R, Bayona N, Marshall S, Cullen N, Bayley M, Chundamala J, Villamere J, Mackie D, Rees L, Hartridge C, Lippert C, Hilditch M, Welch-West P, Weiser M, Ferri C, McCabe P, McCormick A, Aubut JA, Comper P, Salter K, Van Reekum R, Collins D, Foley N, Nowak J, Jutai J, Speechley M, Hellings C, Tu L. A systematic review of the rehabilitation of moderate to severe acquired brain injuries. Brain Inj. 2007 Feb;21(2):107-12. doi: 10.1080/02699050701201524.

    PMID: 17364527BACKGROUND
  • Turner-Stokes L. Evidence for the effectiveness of multi-disciplinary rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a synthesis of two systematic approaches. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Oct;40(9):691-701. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0265.

    PMID: 18843419BACKGROUND
  • Waldron B, Casserly LM, O'Sullivan C. Cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety in adults with acquired brain injury: what works for whom? Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(1):64-101. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2012.724196. Epub 2012 Nov 5.

    PMID: 23121258BACKGROUND
  • Whelan-Goodinson R, Ponsford J, Johnston L, Grant F. Psychiatric disorders following traumatic brain injury: their nature and frequency. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):324-32. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181a712aa.

    PMID: 19858966BACKGROUND
  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

    PMID: 6880820BACKGROUND
  • Kusec A, Murphy FC, Peers PV, Bennett R, Carmona E, Korbacz A, Lawrence C, Cameron E, Bateman A, Watson P, Allanson J, duToit P, Manly T. Mood, Activity Participation, and Leisure Engagement Satisfaction (MAPLES): results from a randomised controlled pilot feasibility trial for low mood in acquired brain injury. BMC Med. 2023 Nov 16;21(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03128-7.

  • Kusec A, Murphy FC, Peers PV, Lawrence C, Cameron E, Morton C, Bateman A, Watson P, Manly T. Mood, Activity Participation, and Leisure Engagement Satisfaction (MAPLES): a randomised controlled pilot feasibility trial for low mood in acquired brain injury. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 22;6:135. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00660-8. eCollection 2020.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain InjuriesDepressionBrain Injuries, Traumatic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Tom Manly, PhD

    University of Cambridge

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Given that this is a psychological assessment, it is not possible to mask the participant, care provider, or investigator. Hence, only the outcomes assessor will be masked.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Programme Leader

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2019

First Posted

March 14, 2019

Study Start

May 20, 2019

Primary Completion

April 27, 2021

Study Completion

April 27, 2021

Last Updated

May 4, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Only anonymised participant data from the study will be made accessible to other researchers upon publication of the study results. All data from all measures, including the questionnaires and qualitative interviews, will be made available once the study is completed. As we intend to publish the study as an open access article, all anonymised data will be available potentially indefinitely.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
The study protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available upon registration of the trial, along with publication of the trial protocol. This is expected to occur before May 2019. Analytic code will be made available upon publication of the study results, approximately 1 year following the completion of the trial (February 2022).
Access Criteria
The study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code will be available to any interested party.

Locations