NCT03865485

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to optimize an adapted version of a parenting program, Parenting for Lifelong Health for Young Children (PLH), to meet the specific needs of families in three low- and middle-income countries in Southeastern Europe (Romania, FYR of Macedonia and Republic of Moldova) using a cluster factorial experimental design to select the most efficacious, cost-effective, and scalable intervention components. This study is the second phase of a three-phase research project (www.rise-plh.eu). The cluster factorial experiment will examine the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation of three selected components of the PLH for Children program to inform the selection of the most effective, cost-effective, and implementable components to include in a prevention package prior to testing it in a subsequent RCT. The cluster factorial experiment will be conducted across three Southeastern European country sites. Each site will recruit families with children aged two to nine years who have elevated levels of child behavior problems, including specifically high-risk groups, such as minorities (e.g. Roma families). Program facilitators will be recruited from local agencies and schools. The factorial experimental trial will randomize 16 clusters in each country to one of 8 experimental conditions which consist of any combination of the three components (program length: 5 sessions/10 sessions; engagement booster: high/low; fidelity booster: high supervision/low supervision). The purpose of this factorial experiment is to estimate the main effects of the three intervention components and interactions between the components. At the end of the cluster factorial experiment, we will develop an optimized version of the program by selecting components or component levels that have the highest level of effectiveness as based on effect size (rather than p-values). We will also take into consideration factors regarding cost-effectiveness and implementation outcomes when designing this optimized intervention package.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
835

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Geographic Reach
3 countries

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 25, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2019

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 7, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 10, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 10, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 19, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

February 25, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Parenting Program

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in level of aggressive behaviour in children: Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) 11/2-5 and 6-18, parent-report, sub-scale "Aggressive behaviour" (from the Externalizing Scale)

    The CBCL is part of the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) and is available for different age ranges, including the targeted range in the present study. For Phase 2, the parent-report versions for children aged 1½-5 and 6-18 are employed. It is the most widely used instrument for assessing child behavioral and emotional symptoms. In addition to the possibility to separate behavioral from emotional symptoms, the CBCL allows for assessment in multiple languages, including Romanian, Russian, and Macedonian. The externalizing subscale raw score ranges from 0 to 48 (CBCL½-5) and 0 to 70 (CBCL6-18) with higher scores indicating more problems. The aggressive behavior subscale belongs to the externalizing scale and assess aggressive behavior (e.g., "Argues a lot"; ; raw score ranges from 0 to 38 in the CBCL ½ - 5 version and 0-36 in the CBCL 6-18 version). Items are rated on a 3-point Likert scale (2 = very true or often true of the child; 0 = not true of the child).

    pre; post: approx. 7 months after pre assessment (September/October 2019); follow-up: approx. 11 months after pre assessment (January/February 2020)

  • Change in frequency of dysfunctional parenting: Parenting Scale (PS) / self-report (shortened version); total score

    This measure is widely used in parenting interventions across the world. The scale was designed to explicitly measure dysfunctional discipline practices in parents. Three subscales may be derived (Laxness, Overreactivity, and Verbosity). For phase 2, the subscale Verbosity is excluded due to poor performance in the pilot study, consistent with numerous other studies evaluating this subscale's psychometric properties. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert Scale in which parents are presented with a situation and then are asked to choose between two alternative responses to a situation (1 = most effective; 7 = most ineffective; i.e., situation: "When I say my child can't do something"). For computation of the subscale scores as well as the total score, the responses on the items are averaged. We will use a modified total score (only from two subscales Laxness \& Overreactivity).

    pre; post: approx. 7 months after pre assessment (September/October 2019); follow-up: approx. 11 months after pre assessment (January/February 2020)

  • Change in frequency of positive parenting and effective discipline: Parenting of Young Children Scale (PARYC) / self-report (21 items); continuous total score

    Positive parenting behavior will be assessed using parent-report of the Parenting of Young Children Scale (PARYC, 21 items). The PARYC measures the frequency of parent behavior over the previous month. Items are summed to create a total frequency scores parenting behavior as well as for the subscales: positive parenting (7 items, e.g., "how often do you play with your child"), setting limits (7 items, e.g., "how often do you stick to your rules and not change your mind") and proactive parenting (7 items, e.g., "how often do you explain what you want your child to do in clear and simple ways"). This scale has been used in PLH trials in other countries and will allow comparison of results to those studies.

    pre; post: approx. 7 months after pre assessment (September/October 2019); follow-up: approx. 11 months after pre assessment (January/February 2020)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in level of internalizing problem behavior in children: Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) 11/2-5 (31 items) and 6-18 (32 items) parent-report, Internalizing Scale; continuous sub-scale score

    pre; post: approx. 7 months after pre assessment (September/October 2019); follow-up: approx. 11 months after pre assessment (January/February 2020)

  • Change in levels of psychological distress in parents: Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales - short version/ self-report (21 items); continuous total score

    pre; post: approx. 7 months after pre assessment (September/October 2019); follow-up: approx. 11 months after pre assessment (January/February 2020)

  • Change in frequency and incidence of child maltreatment: ISPCAN-Child Abuse Screening Tool-Intervention / self-report (16 items); main focus on continuous total score, 2nd question: any effect of intervention on any of the 3 sub-scale scores?

    pre; post: approx. 7 months after pre assessment (September/October 2019); follow-up: approx. 11 months after pre assessment (January/February 2020)

  • RE-AIM Implementation: Quality

    post: approx. 7 months after pre assessment (September/October 2019)

  • RE-AIM Reach: Enrolment rate

    post: approx. 7 months after pre assessment (September/October 2019)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (9)

  • Change in levels of Intimate Partner Violence (29 items); continuous total score and 4 sub-scales (level of severity)

    pre; post: approx. 7 months after pre assessment (September/October 2019); follow-up: approx. 11 months after pre assessment (January/February 2020)

  • Change in levels of parental relationship quality: Couple Satisfaction Index / self-report (4 items); continuous total score

    pre; post: approx. 7 months after pre assessment (September/October 2019); follow-up: approx. 11 months after pre assessment (January/February 2020)

  • Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI), oppositional defiant disorder subscale (9 items)

    Pre (before start of intervention)

  • +6 more other outcomes

Study Arms (8)

Length: long; Engagement booster: high; Fidelity booster: high

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) 1. Program length - long: 10 group sessions of the PLH 2-9 intervention delivered every other week (i.e., relationship building, positive reinforcement, setting limits, and effective discipline); 2. Engagement booster - high: Engagement Boosters (i.e., a communication booster including weekly text messages reminders and 5-minute phone consultations twice a month from facilitators and an enhanced incentives package (including lunch (approx. 1-3€), a food parcel (approx. 2 - 5 €), reimbursement for local transport (FYR of Macedonia and Republic of Moldova only) at each group session and an award for attendance (if parents did not miss more than 1 session, approx. 5-20€) and raffle prizes at the end of the program), 3. Fidelity booster - high supervision: Fidelity Boosters (i.e., 5 structured intensive video feedback supervision sessions for facilitators).

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH)

Length: long; Engagement booster: high; Fidelity booster: low

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) 1. Program length - long: 10 group sessions of the PLH 2-9 intervention delivered every other week (i.e., relationship building, positive reinforcement, setting limits, and effective discipline); 2. Engagement booster - high: Engagement Boosters (i.e., a communication booster including weekly text messages reminders and 5-minute phone consultations twice a month from facilitators and an enhanced incentives package (including lunch (approx. 1-3€), a food parcel (approx. 2 - 5 €), reimbursement for local transport (FYR of Macedonia and Republic of Moldova only) at each group session and an award for attendance (if parents did not miss more than 1 session, approx. 5-20€) and raffle prizes at the end of the program), 3. Fidelity booster - low supervision: No Fidelity Boosters (i.e., supervision on demand only).

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH)

Length: long; Engagement booster: low; Fidelity booster: high

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) 1. Program length - long: 10 group sessions of the PLH 2-9 intervention delivered every other week (i.e., relationship building, positive reinforcement, setting limits, and effective discipline); 2. Engagement booster - low: No Engagement Boosters 3. Fidelity booster - high supervision: Fidelity Boosters (i.e., 5 structured intensive video feedback supervision sessions for facilitators).

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH)

Length: long; Engagement booster: low; Fidelity booster: low

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) 1. Program length - long: 10 group sessions of the PLH 2-9 intervention delivered every other week (i.e., relationship building, positive reinforcement, setting limits, and effective discipline); 2. Engagement booster - low: No Engagement Boosters; 3. Fidelity booster - low supervision: No Fidelity Boosters (i.e., supervision on demand only).

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH)

Length: short; Engagement booster: high; Fidelity booster:high

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) 1. Program length - short: 5 group sessions of the PLH 2-9 intervention delivered every other week (i.e., relationship building, positive reinforcement, setting limits, and effective discipline); 2. Engagement booster - high: Engagement Boosters (i.e., a communication booster including weekly text messages reminders and 5-minute phone consultations twice a month from facilitators and an enhanced incentives package (including lunch (approx. 1-3€), a food parcel (approx. 2 - 5 €), reimbursement for local transport (FYR of Macedonia and Republic of Moldova only) at each group session and an award for attendance (if parents did not miss more than 1 session, approx. 5-20€) and raffle prizes at the end of the program), 3. Fidelity booster - high supervision: Fidelity Boosters (i.e., 5 structured intensive video feedback supervision sessions for facilitators).

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH)

Length: short; Engagement booster: high; Fidelity booster: low

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) 1. Program length - short: 5 group sessions of the PLH 2-9 intervention delivered every other week (i.e., relationship building, positive reinforcement, setting limits, and effective discipline); 2. Engagement booster - high: Engagement Boosters (i.e., a communication booster including weekly text messages reminders and 5-minute phone consultations twice a month from facilitators and an enhanced incentives package (including lunch (approx. 1-3€), a food parcel (approx. 2 - 5 €), reimbursement for local transport (FYR of Macedonia and Republic of Moldova only) at each group session and an award for attendance (if parents did not miss more than 1 session, approx. 5-20€) and raffle prizes at the end of the program), 3. Fidelity booster - low supervision: No Fidelity Boosters (i.e., supervision on demand only).

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH)

Length: short; Engagement booster: low; Fidelity booster: high

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) 1. Program length - short: 5 group sessions of the PLH 2-9 intervention delivered every other week (i.e., relationship building, positive reinforcement, setting limits, and effective discipline); 2. Engagement booster - low: No Engagement Boosters 3. Fidelity booster - high supervision: Fidelity Boosters (i.e., 5 structured intensive video feedback supervision sessions for facilitators).

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH)

Length: short; Engagement booster: low; Fidelity booster: low

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) 1. Program length - short: 5 group sessions of the PLH 2-9 intervention delivered every other week (i.e., relationship building, positive reinforcement, setting limits, and effective discipline); 2. Engagement booster - low: No Engagement Boosters 3. Fidelity booster - low supervision: No Fidelity Boosters (i.e., supervision on demand only).

Behavioral: Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH)

Interventions

The Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) initiative is focused on the development, evaluation, and dissemination of parenting programs to reduce violence against children and improve child wellbeing in LMIC. It was established to address the need to develop low-cost, evidence-based parenting programs that can be integrated within existing service delivery systems in LMIC. The PLH for Young Children from 2-9 y. (PLH 2-9) program includes general content like one-on-one time/child-led play; praising and rewarding children; instructions, household rules, and routines; managing difficult behaviours: ignore and consequences; reflection and moving on. Core activities during sessions include group discussions illustrated vignettes, role-plays, collaborative problem solving, practicing skills at home.

Length: long; Engagement booster: high; Fidelity booster: highLength: long; Engagement booster: high; Fidelity booster: lowLength: long; Engagement booster: low; Fidelity booster: highLength: long; Engagement booster: low; Fidelity booster: lowLength: short; Engagement booster: high; Fidelity booster: lowLength: short; Engagement booster: high; Fidelity booster:highLength: short; Engagement booster: low; Fidelity booster: highLength: short; Engagement booster: low; Fidelity booster: low

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 or older;
  • Primary caregiver responsible for the care of a child between the ages of two and nine;
  • Report elevated levels of child behavior problems for the child that he/she chooses to be part of the study (based on the Child and Adolescent Disruptive Behavior Inventory, oppositional defiant disorder subscale (8 items); scores above the mean based on normative data
  • Have lived in the same household as this child at least four nights a week in the previous month and will continue to do so;
  • Agreement of being randomized to the different conditions in the study (PLH for Children program);
  • Provision of Informed consent to participate in the full study.

You may not qualify if:

  • any adult 1) exhibiting severe mental health problems or acute mental disabilities;
  • \) that has been referred to child protection services due to child abuse.
  • Age 18 or older;
  • Participate in PLH facilitator training workshop;
  • Available to deliver the entire PLH 2-9 intervention
  • Provision of Informed Consent to participate in the full study
  • Age 18 or older;
  • Previous participation in PLH facilitator training workshop;
  • Participate in PLH coach training workshop;
  • Available to deliver coaching sessions during delivery of the PLH 2-9 intervention
  • Provision of Informed Consent to participate in the full study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Health for Youth Association

Chisinau, MD2020, Moldova

Location

Institute for Marriage, Family and Systemic Practice - ALTERNATIVA

Skopje, 1000, North Macedonia

Location

Babes Boylai University

Cluj-Napoca, 400084, Romania

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Barlow J, Johnston I, Kendrick D, Polnay L, Stewart-Brown S. Individual and group-based parenting programmes for the treatment of physical child abuse and neglect. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD005463. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005463.pub2.

    PMID: 16856097BACKGROUND
  • Chen M, Chan KL. Effects of Parenting Programs on Child Maltreatment Prevention: A Meta-Analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Jan;17(1):88-104. doi: 10.1177/1524838014566718. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

    PMID: 25573846BACKGROUND
  • Knerr W, Gardner F, Cluver L. Improving positive parenting skills and reducing harsh and abusive parenting in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Prev Sci. 2013 Aug;14(4):352-63. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0314-1.

    PMID: 23315023BACKGROUND
  • Mikton, C. (2012). Two challenges to importing evidence-based child maltreatment prevention programs developed in high-income countries to low- and middle-income countries: Generalizability and affordability. In H. Dubowitz (Ed.), World perspectives on child abuse (p. 97). Aurora, CO: International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bruhl A, Waller F, Foran HM, Jansen E, Hutchings J, Heinrichs N. Spillover mechanisms linking intimate partner violence and child maltreatment: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study among Eastern European mothers. BMC Public Health. 2025 Nov 4;25(1):3778. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24955-8.

  • Frantz I, Foran HM, Lachman JM, Gardner F, McMahon RJ, Ogden T, Hutchings J, Costin MR, Kunovski I, Raleva M, Mueller J, Heinrichs N. Adverse event assessment in a parenting programme: experiences from a multisite randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Aug 17;25(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08357-6.

  • Lachman JM, Heinrichs N, Jansen E, Bruhl A, Taut D, Fang X, Gardner F, Hutchings J, Ward CL, Williams ME, Raleva M, Baban A, Lesco G, Foran HM. Preventing child mental health problems through parenting interventions in Southeastern Europe (RISE): Protocol for a multi-country cluster randomized factorial study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Nov;86:105855. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105855. Epub 2019 Oct 24.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Heather Foran, Prof.

    University of Klagenfurt

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jamie Lachman, Dr.

    University of Oxford

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Frances Gardner, Prof.

    University of Oxford

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Judy Hutchings, Prof.

    Bangor University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Adriana Baban, Prof.

    Babes Boylai University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Marija Raleva, Prof.

    Institute for Marriage, Family and Systemic Practice - ALTERNATIVA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Galina Lesco, Dr.

    Health for Youth Association, Moldova

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Catherine Ward, Prof.

    University of Cape Town

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Xiangming Fang, Prof.

    Georgia State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The implementing partners in each country site will notify the participating families of their allocation status (based on clusters) after baseline data collection is completed in each cluster to assure that participants are blind to allocation during the initial assessment. Research assistants conducting data assessments and conducting analysis will be blind to allocation to minimize assessment bias. Because of facilitators' involvement in the program implementation, blinding will not be possible for service providers. Similarly, participants will not be blind to their own treatment condition.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: Factorial Assignment For the study, a factorial design will be used testing 3 components. With these three components, there will be a total of eight conditions. The purpose of this factorial experiment is to estimate the main effects of the three intervention components and interactions between the components, not to compare the 8 experimental conditions to each other. Each main effect and interaction estimate is based on all of the experimental conditions.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2019

First Posted

March 7, 2019

Study Start

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion

May 10, 2020

Study Completion

May 10, 2020

Last Updated

May 19, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

It is planned to share results to members of the scientific community with an interest in parenting interventions, behavioral problems in children, process evaluation, the transferability of interventions across cultures and contexts, and the MOST (the Multiphase Optimization Strategy). The aim is to sustain the intervention after the end of the project by including local authorities, policy makers, and other stakeholders such as community groups and caregivers in the intervention from each country. Further, we will archive the dataset and upload metadata in the certified repository Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/. Further details about IPDSharing are described in the Data Management Plan and this is available by contacting Prof. Heather Foran (heather.foran@aau.at).

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Study Protocol will be shared once it is published (preferably open access)
Access Criteria
(see above)

Locations