A Narrative Intervention to Decrease Abortion Stigma
1 other identifier
interventional
215
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Abortion stigma is pervasive in the United States. It operates across multiple levels, including the individual, community, and structural. While abortion itself does not cause mental health problems, due to stigma, women who undergo abortion are at risk of suffering negative psychological responses including thought suppression and isolation, which can result in psychological distress. Few intervention studies have addressed abortion stigma. Research in other disciplines, in particular mental health, has demonstrated the importance of self-validation in improved coping. Drawing from psychologists' use of writing in cognitive therapy and the discipline of Narrative Medicine's emphasis on narrative as a mechanism of healing, the proposed study attempts to test a novel intervention to reduce individual level abortion stigma. The study will be a randomized controlled trial evaluating a narrative intervention to reduce individual level abortion stigma. The principal research question is: can a narrative intervention that aims to positively frame the abortion experience decrease individual level abortion stigma? An additional research question is: will women who take part in a narrative intervention to reduce abortion stigma have improved psychological responses to the abortion? Women in the intervention group will view a digital story on a tablet intending to provide education and normalization and then respond to a writing prompt aimed at cognitive restructuring. The control group will receive care as usual.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 5, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 5, 2020
CompletedApril 20, 2020
April 1, 2020
8 months
March 4, 2019
April 17, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Individual level abortion stigma
Difference in score on the Individual Level Abortion Stigma Scale (ILAS) between baseline and follow-up: The ILAS is a validated 20-item scale that measures individual level stigma with four subscales including: worries about judgment, isolation, self-judgment, and community condemnation. The ILAS has a maximum score of five; in the study that established validity of this scale, the mean score was 1.35 with a standard deviation of 0.63. A higher score indicates greater stigma and a lower score indicates lesser stigma, so a greater decrease in mean scores between baseline and follow-up seen in the intervention group as compared to the control group would indicate an effect of the narrative intervention.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Psychological distress
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention arm will view a digital story on a tablet created by the research team, then respond to a writing prompt. A baseline abortion stigma and psychological distress survey will be taken at enrollment and then again at follow-up after 2-4 weeks.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will receive care as usual at the abortion clinic. A baseline abortion stigma and psychological distress survey will be taken at enrollment and then again at follow-up after 2-4 weeks.
Interventions
Participants in the intervention group will first view a digital story on a tablet with headphones that will combine a fictional patient's abortion story with basic medical and social facts regarding abortion. After viewing the narrative, participants will be asked to write a narrative either on a tablet provided or on paper with the prompt: "Patients have different thoughts and feelings about their experiences when they have this procedure. Tell a story (about yourself or someone else, real or imaginary) that might help another patient feel supported."
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Chicagolead
- Planned Parenthood Federation of Americacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Planned Parenthood
Chicago, Illinois, 60610, United States
Related Publications (2)
Cockrill K, Upadhyay UD, Turan J, Greene Foster D. The stigma of having an abortion: development of a scale and characteristics of women experiencing abortion stigma. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013 Jun;45(2):79-88. doi: 10.1363/4507913. Epub 2013 May 2.
PMID: 23750622RESULTShacham S. A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States. J Pers Assess. 1983 Jun;47(3):305-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4703_14.
PMID: 6886962RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Melissa Gilliam, MD
University of Chicago
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2019
First Posted
March 6, 2019
Study Start
June 16, 2019
Primary Completion
February 5, 2020
Study Completion
February 5, 2020
Last Updated
April 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data from this study will not be shared outside of the researchers involved in this protocol.