Efficacy and Safety in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Implantation Via Cephalic Versus Axillary Vein Access (CEPHAX)
CEPHAX
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Efficacy and Safety in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Implantation Via Cephalic Versus Axillary Vein Access. The CEPHAX Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of axillary versus cephalic venous access in the pacemakers and defibrillators implantation. Half of participants will receive the implant via fluoroscopy guided axillary venous access and the other half will receive the implant via improved cephalic venous access.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 1, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.4 years
February 21, 2019
February 28, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Implant Success
Success of the implant through the assigned access vein
30 days
Implant Complications
All implant related complications
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Lead Complications
From date of implant until the date of first documented, assessed up to 48 months
Upper limb thrombosis
From date of implant until the date of first documented, assessed up to 48 months
Pneumothorax
30 days
Bleeding
30 days
Other Outcomes (2)
Time to access.
From cutaneous incision to reach the right atrium with the guidewire, assessed up to 45 minutes.
Time of implant.
From the skin incision to the skin suture, assessed up to 180 minutes.
Study Arms (2)
AXILLARY VEIN ACCESS
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group of subjects will receive the implant of device via fluoroscopy-guided axillary puncture technique.
CEPHALIC VEIN ACCESS
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group of subjects will receive the implant of device via optimized cephalic vein cutdown technique.
Interventions
Implantation of endovenous cardiac stimulation device.
Implantation of endovenous cardiac defibrillation device.
Fluoroscopy-guided axillary puncture to get vein access
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a endovenous pacemaker or defibrillator indication.
You may not qualify if:
- Pre-existing ipsilateral pacing electrode.
- Previous ipsilateral lymphadenectomy.
- Indication of cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real
Ciudad Real, 13005, Spain
Related Publications (3)
Calkins H, Ramza BM, Brinker J, Atiga W, Donahue K, Nsah E, Taylor E, Halperin H, Lawrence JH, Tomaselli G, Berger RD. Prospective randomized comparison of the safety and effectiveness of placement of endocardial pacemaker and defibrillator leads using the extrathoracic subclavian vein guided by contrast venography versus the cephalic approach. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Apr;24(4 Pt 1):456-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00456.x.
PMID: 11341082BACKGROUNDSquara F, Tomi J, Scarlatti D, Theodore G, Moceri P, Ferrari E. Self-taught axillary vein access without venography for pacemaker implantation: prospective randomized comparison with the cephalic vein access. Europace. 2017 Dec 1;19(12):2001-2006. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw363.
PMID: 28064251BACKGROUNDJimenez-Diaz J, Higuera-Sobrino F, Piqueras-Flores J, Perez-Diaz P, Gonzalez-Marin MA. Fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein access vs cephalic vein access in pacemaker and defibrillator implantation: Randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;30(9):1588-1593. doi: 10.1111/jce.14060. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
PMID: 31310038DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Javier Jiménez Díaz, Dr.
Arrhythmia Unit Director
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2019
First Posted
March 1, 2019
Study Start
October 1, 2017
Primary Completion
February 20, 2019
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Immediately following publication. No end date.
- Access Criteria
- Anyone who wishes to access the data.
All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.