Experimental Pain Reporting Accuracy and Clinical Post-operative Pain
Does Pain Reporting Accuracy Relates to the Intensity of Acute Post-operative Pain and Analgesic Drug Consumption?
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain is a subjective experience that differs in intensity from one person to another. Appropriate medical care relies on an accurate assessment of the patients' condition. However, when it comes to subjective assessment, accurate assessment is a challenge. The most common tools used to estimate pain intensity depend on patient pain reports on a numerical pain scale (NPS) or a similar scales. Although these tools are widely used, there is a tendency to ignore the fact that the reliability and accuracy of pain reports are strongly influenced not only by the measuring instrument, but also by the person who uses it. A method has recently been developed to assess the accuracy of pain reports, and in a series of studies it has been found that the more accurate a person is in pain reports in response to stimulation,the smaller his placebo effect is .The aim of the study is to investigate whether assessing the accuracy of a person's pain reports can predict who will experience intensified post-operative pain and post-operative analgesic medications intake.The study will include 40 patients undergoing elective head \& neck surgery. The study will be conducted prospectively and will include one pre-operative meeting to assess the accuracy of pain reports using the Focused Analgesia Selection Test (FAST). Patients will also complete pain-related psychological questionnaires during the session. In addition, post-operative pain measurements (NPS), and the use of pain relieving drugs (SOS) will be taken until release.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2020
CompletedJanuary 28, 2020
January 1, 2020
7 months
February 13, 2019
January 27, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in acute post-operative pain throughout the hospitalization period
Subjects will be asked to report their pain on numerical pain scale (NPS) ranging from 0, denoting "no pain", to 10, denoting "the worst pain imaginable".
From post-surgery recovery until discharge at specific time points: pain report (NPS) at the time of analgesic medication consumption, an hour after administration of the drug, in addition to regular monitoring of every 6 hours during hospitalization.
Amount of analgesic drugs consumption I
Quantification of the amount of analgesic drugs consumption will be performed by counting the number of times an SOS drug has been given. The SOS medications (beyond analgesic protocol) include Optalgin PO / Acamol IV / Oxycodone PO/ tramal IV.
From post-surgery recovery until discharge (24-48 hours after surgery)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Amount of analgesic drugs consumption II
From post-surgery recovery until discharge (24-48 hours after surgery)
Amount of analgesic drugs consumption III
From post-surgery recovery until discharge (24-48 hours after surgery)
Study Arms (1)
Assessing pain reporting accuracy
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will undergo pre-operative evaluation of their pain reporting accuracy ability in order to assess its relation to post-operative acute pain and analgesic consumption
Interventions
pain reporting accuracy will be assessed by the Focused Analgesia Selection Task (FAST) procedure. The FAST is based on recording a subject's pain reports in response to repeated administration of thermal noxious stimuli of various intensities, applied on the non-dominant arm with the Medoc® Thermal Sensory Analyzer II. The subjects will receive 1 of 7 designated temperatures (44°C, 45°C, 46°C, 47°C, 48°C, 49°C, and 50°C), each presented 7 times in a random block-ordered design (49 stimuli in total).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>18
- Candidates to Head \& Neck elective surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of diagnosed psychiatric disorders, cognitive and /or neurological deficits;
- Use of analgesic, anti-depressants or anti-anxiolytics medications on a regular basis (except for oral contraceptives);
- Pregnancy.
- Inability to give informed consent, communicate, and understand the purpose and instructions of this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Carmel Medical Centerlead
- University of Haifacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Carmel Medical Center
Haifa, 3436212, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2019
First Posted
February 26, 2019
Study Start
September 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 1, 2020
Study Completion
April 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01