Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Three Final Irrigants
In-vivo Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Three Different Solutions as Final Irrigant During Endodontic Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was conducted to determine the antibacterial affect of three different solutions used as final irrigant during endodontic therapy. The investigator's objective was to compare the antibacterial affect of relatively new final irrigant QMix with EDTA and Qmix with EDTA+CHX by evaluating the bacteriological status of the root canal before and after use of the final irrigant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Apr 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2019
CompletedFebruary 25, 2019
February 1, 2019
10 months
February 21, 2019
February 22, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Colony forming Unit
Change in the Colony forming unit (CFU) of the root canal sample will be assessed by determining the difference between Mean CFU of sample taken before use of final irrigant and sample taken after use of final irrigant.
Before and after use of final irrigant, up to 5 minutes
Study Arms (3)
Group I
EXPERIMENTALQMix the solution under investigation which includes CHX EDTA and detergent QMix Root Canal Irrigant
Group II
ACTIVE COMPARATORit involves use of two irrigant solutions, 17%EDTA+2%Chlorhexidine
Group III
ACTIVE COMPARATOR17% EDTA with no antibacterial activity . the control group
Interventions
Endodontic irrigant recommended for final irrigation
two endodontic irrigants will be used in this group in a sequential manner
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Teeth:
- Single rooted (One root canal)
- Necrosed teeth requiring root canal treatment.
- Teeth with mature apices
- Permanent dentition
- Mandibular \& Maxillary
- PAI category 1 to 4
You may not qualify if:
- Teeth:
- Single rooted teeth with multiple canals
- Root canal treated
- Requiring elective endodontic therapy
- With partial necrosis
- Fractured
- Having calcified and obliterated canals.
- Having root resorption
- Root canals which could not be negotiated to full working length with #10 K file
- Having severe periodontitis with exacerbating features (PAI = 5)
- Having grade III mobility
- Patients who took systemic antibiotics in past four weeks.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hasan Zaidi
Karachi, Sindh, 75055, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hasan Zaidi, BDS
Dow University of Health Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2019
First Posted
February 25, 2019
Study Start
April 3, 2017
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02