NCT05006209

Brief Summary

A hundred asymptomatic molar teeth with periapical lesions were treated in single versus multiple visit root canal treatment. Half of the teeth were randomly assigned to the one-visit (OV) group and received an additional final rinse with 2% CHX before obturation. The other teeth were treated in two visits (TV) with calcium hydroxide dressing. All patients were recalled and investigated clinically and radiographically for 48 months

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 24, 2021

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 16, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

August 16, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

July 24, 2021

Last Update Submit

August 7, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

chlorhexidineone visit root canal treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Clinical healing according to presence of clinical symptoms

    All patients were called for follow up visits. The clinical healing was determined by examining clinical symptoms including presence of pain, tenderness to percussion and palpation, presence of sinus tract or swelling, and mobility. If one of these symptoms occurs, it is considered as failure..

    12 months

  • Clinical healing according to presence of clinical symptoms

    All patients were called for follow up visits. The clinical healing was determined by examining clinical symptoms including presence of pain, tenderness to percussion and palpation, presence of sinus tract or swelling, and mobility.If one of these symptoms occurs, it is considered as failure..

    24 months

  • Clinical healing according to presence of clinical symptoms

    All patients were called for follow up visits. The clinical healing was determined by examining clinical symptoms including presence of pain, tenderness to percussion and palpation, presence of sinus tract or swelling, and mobility.If one of these symptoms occurs, it is considered as failure..

    48 months

  • Changes in the size and the PAI score of the periapical lesion

    The rate of radiographic healing of the periapical lesion. Follow-up visits were performed for all patients in order to evaluate radiographic status. Changes in apical bone density indicating radiographic healing was assessed using Periapical Index (PAI)(Orstavik 1986) as the scoring system.

    12 months

  • Changes in the size and the PAI score of the periapical lesion

    The rate of radiographic healing of the periapical lesion. Follow-up visits were performed for all patients in order to evaluate radiographic status. Changes in apical bone density indicating radiographic healing was assessed using Periapical Index (PAI)(Orstavik 1986) as the scoring system.

    24 months

  • Changes in the size and the PAI score of the periapical lesion

    The rate of radiographic healing of the periapical lesion. Follow-up visits were performed for all patients in order to evaluate radiographic status. Changes in apical bone density indicating radiographic healing was assessed using Periapical Index (PAI)(Orstavik 1986) as the scoring system.

    48 months

Study Arms (2)

One visit root canal treatment with CHX

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The teeth were treated in one-visit (OV) root canal treatment. Final root canal irrigation was performed with 5% EDTA, followed by 2.5% NaOCl and received an additional final rinse with 2% CHX before obturation.

Other: One visit root canal treatment

Two visit root canal treatment with CH

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The teeth were treated in two visit (TV) root canal treatment. After completion of root canal instrumentation, calcium hydroxide (CH) paste was placed into the root canal. In second visit, all root canals were irrigated with 5% EDTA followed by 2.5% NaOCl before obturation.

Other: Two visit root canal treatment

Interventions

Also known as: CHX
One visit root canal treatment with CHX
Also known as: Calcium hydroxide
Two visit root canal treatment with CH

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • with a non-contributory medical history,
  • mature molar teeth with periapical lesions,
  • diagnosed as asymptomatic apical periodontitis

You may not qualify if:

  • clinical symptoms, drainage,
  • more than 5 mm loss of periodontal attachment,
  • previous endodontic treatment,
  • non-restorable tooth

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Micoogullari Kurt S, Caliskan MK. Efficacy of chlorhexidine as a final irrigant in one-visit root canal treatment: a prospective comparative study. Int Endod J. 2018 Oct;51(10):1069-1076. doi: 10.1111/iej.12931. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

    PMID: 29603299BACKGROUND
  • Paredes-Vieyra J, Enriquez FJ. Success rate of single- versus two-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jul 26.

    PMID: 22892729BACKGROUND
  • Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN. Optimising single-visit disinfection with supplementary approaches: a quest for predictability. Aust Endod J. 2011 Dec;37(3):92-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2011.00334.x.

    PMID: 22117714BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Calcium Hydroxide

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HydroxidesAlkaliesInorganic ChemicalsCalcium CompoundsAnionsIonsElectrolytes

Study Officials

  • Seniha Miçooğulları Kurt

    Ege University Faculty of Dentistry

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principle investigator, Asst. Assoc. Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2021

First Posted

August 16, 2021

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

January 1, 2021

Study Completion

April 1, 2021

Last Updated

August 16, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share