NCT03848195

Brief Summary

This study prospectively analyses and describes a cohort of non-elderly hip fracture patients at four orthopaedic departments in two Scandinavian countries regarding epidemiology, treatment, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, functional outcome as well as clinical results.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
218

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
2 countries

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 29, 2015

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 28, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 20, 2019

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 12, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

5.3 years

First QC Date

November 28, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 10, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

hip fracturesadultmiddle-agedDXA-scanosteoporosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (15)

  • Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the time of the fracture

    Analysis of BMD measured by DXA-scan at the time of the fracture.

    Baseline

  • Trauma mechanism leading to the hip fracture

    Analysis of trauma mechanism, defined as "low-energy trauma" or "not low-energy trauma", leading to the hip fracture.

    Baseline

  • Hip fracture type according to Garden classification (femoral neck fractures) and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO)-classification (other hip fractures)

    Analysis of the patients' hip fracture types on diagnostic radiographs.

    Baseline

  • EQ-5D

    Analysis of outcome with EQ5D (PROM). A 5 dimensions, 3-levels, questionnaire regarding general health. A subscore of 1-3 for each dimension combines into a 5 digit code where lower value for each dimension indicate better outcome (total range 11111-33333).

    Patients are followed up during two years

  • EQ-VAS

    Analysis of outcome with EQ-VAS (PROM). A visual analog scale regarding general health ranging from 0-100 where lower value indicate worse outcome.

    Patients are followed up during two years

  • Oxford Hip Score

    Analysis of outcome with Oxford Hip Score (PROM). A 12-item, 5-levels, questionnaire on hip problems in activities of daily living. The subscores 0-4 is added to a total score for the 12 items where a higher score indicate a better outcome (total range 0-48).

    Patients are followed up during two years

  • VAS-pain, satisfaction, rehabilitation (VAS-psr)

    Analysis of outcome with VAS-psr (PROM). Three visual analog scales (one for each dimension) regarding pain, satisfaction and rehabilitation ranging from 0-100 where lower value indicate better outcome.

    Patients are followed up during two years

  • New Mobility Score

    Analysis of outcome with New Mobility Score (PROM). A 3-items questionnaire regarding walking ability. Each item is scored 1-3 and added into a total score where higher score indicate better outcome (total range 3-9).

    Patients are followed up during two years

  • Timed up and go

    Analysis of outcome with timed up and go test (functional) measured in seconds. Shorter time indicates better outcome.

    Patients are followed up during two years

  • 10 meter walking test

    Analysis of outcome with 10 meter walking test (functional) measured in seconds. Shorter time indicates better outcome.

    Patients are followed up during two years

  • Hand grip strength

    Analysis of outcome with hand grip strength (functional) measured in kg. Higher value indicates better outcome.

    Patients are followed up during two years

  • Complications after hip fracture surgery

    Type and rate of complications after hip fracture surgery (clinical) are recorded.

    Patients are followed up during two years

  • Reoperations after hip fracture surgery

    Type and frequency of reoperations after hip fracture surgery (clinical).

    Patients are followed up during two years

  • Radiological outcome after hip fracture surgery

    Analysis of radiological outcome after hip fracture surgery. Radiographs are assessed according to pre-defined criteria.

    Patients are followed up during two years

  • Diagnosis of avascular necrosis by MRI with metal artefact reduction

    Analysis of the use of MRI MARS to assess avascular necrosis of the femoral head in patients with femoral neck fracture treated with internal fixation.

    Patients are followed up during two years

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 59 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Among hip fracture patients treated at the participating departments, patients aged 18 to 59 years, who sustain an acute non-pathological hip fracture and are treated within four weeks, are invited to participate in the study. All patients are invited, regardless of medical, cognitive and functional pre-fracture status. The participating orthopaedic departments are part of local hospitals, treating all patients in the catchment area who seeks medical care at low (Sweden) or no cost (Denmark).

You may qualify if:

  • Acute non-pathologic hip fracture regardless of trauma energy level or previous medical conditions.

You may not qualify if:

  • Fracture older than four weeks.
  • Not able to follow up, e.g. not living in the department area.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Department of Orthopaedics, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre

Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark

Location

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kolding Hospital - part of Hospital Lillebaelt

Kolding, 6000, Denmark

Location

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital

Odense, 5000, Denmark

Location

Skane University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics

Malmo, 20502, Sweden

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hip FracturesOsteoporosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Femoral FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesHip InjuriesLeg InjuriesBone Diseases, MetabolicBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Cecilia Rogmark, MD, PhD

    Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Sweden

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, orthopaedic surgeon, PhD-student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2018

First Posted

February 20, 2019

Study Start

July 29, 2015

Primary Completion

December 1, 2020

Study Completion

December 1, 2020

Last Updated

December 12, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations