Study of Porcine Fibrin Sealant in Preventing Cervical Anastomotic Leakage (PLACE030)
A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Porcine Fibrin Sealant in Preventing Cervical Anastomotic Leakage for Esophageal or Junctional Carcinoma. (PLACE030)
1 other identifier
interventional
360
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy and assess the role of Porcine Fibrin Sealant (Bioseal®) in preventing cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy in the patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Feb 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_3
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedJune 12, 2025
June 1, 2025
4.4 years
February 19, 2019
June 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of postoperative cervical anastomotic leakage
Incidence of postoperative cervical anastomotic leakage Cervical anastomotic leakage will be diagnosed based on a combination of clinical presentation, radiological findings, and/or endoscopic findings within the first 3 months after the operation.
within the first 3 months after esophagectomy
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Overall survival Overall survival (OS)
At end of trial- up to 2 years in follow up
Disease Free Survival Disease-free survival (DFS)
At end of trial- up to 2 years in follow up
Postoperative Complications
within the first 3 months after esophagectomy
Study Arms (2)
Surgery+PFS
EXPERIMENTALArm A consists of the concurrent application of Porcine Fibrin Sealant (PFS) on the gastroesophageal anastomosis during McKeown esophagectomy.
Surgery
PLACEBO COMPARATORArm B underwent conventional anastomosis during McKeown esophagectomy.
Interventions
McKeown esophagectomy will be performed for patients with resectable thoracic esophageal carcinoma or gastroesophageal junction cancer. At last, 2.5ml Porcine Fibrin Sealant will be instilled over the cervical anastomose line.
McKeown esophagectomy including open or minimally invasive esophagectomy will be performed for patients with resectable thoracic esophageal carcinoma or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Two-field lymphadenectomy with total mediastinal lymph node dissection is performed during surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologic diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of thoracic esophageal carcinoma or gastroesophageal junction cancer with Stage T1-4aN0-3M0, according to 8th edition of Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging system
- More than 6 months of expected survival
- Age ranges from 18 to75 years
- Absolute white blood cells count ≥4.0×109/L, neutrophil ≥1.5×109/L, platelets ≥100.0×109/L, hemoglobin ≥90g/L, and normal functions of liver and kidney.
- WHO performance status (PS) of 0-1
- Informed consent will be obtained before the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have undergone definitive chemoradiotherapy
- Patients with concomitant hemorrhagic disease
- Patients with other uncontrollable status that cannot tolerate surgery
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to the porcine fibrin sealant product
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- Patients cannot signed the informed consent document because of psychological quality, family and social factors
- Patients with concomitant peripheral neuropathy, whose CTC status is 2 or even more
- Have a history of diabetes over 10 years and with poorly controlled blood sugar level
- Patients with serious cardiac, respiratory, hepatic, renal,hematologic, immunological disease or cachexy, who cannot tolerate surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
Jieyang Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Jieyang, Guangdong, 522000, China
Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou
Shantou, Guangdong, :515000, China
Zhongshan Peoples Hospital
Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528403, China
Sichuan Cancer Hospital
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Shanghai, China
Related Publications (18)
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
PMID: 26742998BACKGROUNDChen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
PMID: 26808342BACKGROUNDJones CE, Watson TJ. Anastomotic Leakage Following Esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 2015 Nov;25(4):449-59. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
PMID: 26515945BACKGROUNDLow DE. Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Aug;15(8):1319-22. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1511-0. Epub 2011 May 10.
PMID: 21557015BACKGROUNDZhou C, Ma G, Li X, Li J, Yan Y, Liu P, He J, Ren Y. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep 4;13:269. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0661-z.
PMID: 26338060BACKGROUNDLaw S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1997 Aug;226(2):169-73. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199708000-00008.
PMID: 9296510BACKGROUNDYuan Y, Zeng X, Hu Y, Xie T, Zhao Y. Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 2;2014(10):CD008446. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008446.pub3.
PMID: 25274134BACKGROUNDTakeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Kitagawa Y, Baba H, Kimura W, Tomita N, Nakagoe T, Shimada M, Sugihara K, Mori M. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014 Aug;260(2):259-66. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000644.
PMID: 24743609BACKGROUNDvan Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A; CROSS Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088.
PMID: 22646630BACKGROUNDLiu Q, Chen J, Wen J, Yang H, Hu Y, Luo K, Tan Z, Fu J. Comparison of right- and left-approach esophagectomy for elderly patients with operable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity matched study. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(7):1883-1890. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.22.
PMID: 28839986BACKGROUNDRutegard M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I, Lagergren J. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):99-103. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1926-6. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
PMID: 21769467BACKGROUNDEderle A, Scattolini C, Bulighin G, Benini L, Orlandi PG, Talamini G, Vantini I. Does the combination of a human fibrin sealant with ranitidine accelerate the healing of duodenal ulcer? Ital J Gastroenterol. 1991 Jul-Aug;23(6):354-6.
PMID: 1742526BACKGROUNDNguyen NT, Nguyen CT, Stevens CM, Steward E, Paya M. The efficacy of fibrin sealant in prevention of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Surg Res. 2004 Dec;122(2):218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.05.005.
PMID: 15555621BACKGROUNDMartin I, Au K. Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of anastomotic leak after a pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. HPB (Oxford). 2013 Aug;15(8):561-6. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12018. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
PMID: 23458447BACKGROUNDTekinbas C, Erol MM, Akdogan R, Turkyilmaz S, Aslan M. Treatment of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy with endoscopic hemoclips. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Mar;137(3):766-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.01.052. Epub 2008 Sep 14. No abstract available.
PMID: 19258111BACKGROUNDLee S, Ahn JY, Jung HY, Lee JH, Choi KS, Kim DH, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee GH, Kim JH, Kim BS, Yook JH, Oh ST, Kim BS, Han S. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic and surgical management for postoperative upper gastrointestinal leakage. Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4232-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3028-y. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
PMID: 23783553BACKGROUNDUpadhyaya VD, Gopal SC, Gangopadhyaya AN, Gupta DK, Sharma S, Upadyaya A, Kumar V, Pandey A. Role of fibrin glue as a sealant to esophageal anastomosis in cases of congenital esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. World J Surg. 2007 Dec;31(12):2412-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9244-7.
PMID: 17917772BACKGROUNDSaldana-Cortes JA, Larios-Arceo F, Prieto-Diaz-Chavez E, De Buen EP, Gonzalez-Mercado S, Alvarez-Villasenor AS, Prieto-Aldape MR, Fuentes-Orozco C, Gonzalez-Ojeda A. Role of fibrin glue in the prevention of cervical leakage and strictures after esophageal reconstruction of caustic injury. World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):986-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-9949-x.
PMID: 19234736BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hong Yang, Ph.D.,M.D.
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Cente
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2019
First Posted
February 20, 2019
Study Start
February 21, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
June 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share