NCT02432794

Brief Summary

This is a randomized clinical trial to clarify if the delay phenomenon could reduce the incidence of oesophagogastric dehiscence after an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer comparing an experimental group vs control group. The delay phenomenon will be performed by an arteriographic approach.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 21, 2015

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2015

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 4, 2015

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 20, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

April 21, 2015

Last Update Submit

August 19, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Anastomotic leakage

    investigators will consider anastomotic dehiscence the presence of one or more of the following conditions: radiologic confirmation by water-soluble contrast study (gastrografin administered orally) or thoracoabdominal Tc with oral contrast of dehiscence of oesophagogastric anastomosis or the stapler end of the gastroplasty. When the clinical conditions of patient don't allow a Rx control investigators will consider an anastomotic leakage in these conditions: Thoracic drain output of oesophagogastric content with amylase \> 40 ukAT/L, confirmation of anastomotic dehiscence by the surgeon during a reintervention, endoscopic confirmation of anastomotic leakage of the stapled end of the plasty and methylene blue output after oral administration (100 ml of water with 10ml of methylene blue)

    7 days

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • plasty ischemia

    7 days

  • hospital stay

    90 days

  • major and minor morbidity

    90 days

  • postoperative mortality

    during hospitalization and/or 30 days after surgery

  • post-embolization morbidity

    30 days

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

delay phenomenon by arteriography

EXPERIMENTAL

intervention: delay phenomenon by arteriography. Patients who will be subjected a delay phenomenon by arteriographic procedure before esophageal resection surgery minimum 14 days before surgery. An angiogram of the celiac trunk is performed through a femoral access before and after the embolization. A 4-5 Fr Simmons or Cobra catheter is used for the catheterization and embolization of the left gastric artery, and 0.035-inch platinum coils are proximally placed from the main trunk in the splenic artery. When accessory left gastric arteries are present, they are catheterized and embolized as well. The right gastric artery catheterization is realized by a 4-5 Fr catheter and coils or microcoils are proximally placed in the artery as well.

Procedure: delay phenomenon by arteriographic approach

control group

NO INTERVENTION

Patients who will be operated directly without gastric ischemic conditioning. The investigators don't performed any arteriography before the esophageal surgical resection

Interventions

we improve the microvascularization of the gastric fundus occluding the right and left gastric artery, and splenic artery two weeks before surgery by arteriography

delay phenomenon by arteriography

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients requiring a subtotal esophagectomy with en-bloc resection and an intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy for esophageal cancer
  • or above years old
  • Acceptance and signing the full informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Absence of pancreatitis
  • Anatomic vascular alteration that contraindicate the embolization (congenital celiac trunk stenosis, presence of arcuate ligament,etc,..)
  • refuse to collaborate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Leandre Farran Teixidor

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907, Spain

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Gonzalez-Gonzalez JJ, Sanz-Alvarez L, Marques-Alvarez L, Navarrete-Guijosa F, Martinez-Rodriguez E. [Complications of surgical resection of esophageal cancer]. Cir Esp. 2006 Dec;80(6):349-60. doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(06)70987-3. Spanish.

  • Schroder W, Beckurts KT, Stahler D, Stutzer H, Fischer JH, Holscher AH. Microcirculatory changes associated with gastric tube formation in the pig. Eur Surg Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;34(6):411-7. doi: 10.1159/000065709.

  • Farran Teixidor L, Llop Talaveron J, Galan Guzman M, Aranda Danso H, Miro Martin M, Bettonica Larranaga C, Estremiana Garcia F, Biondo S. [Surgical outcomes of esophageal cancer resection since the development of an Oesophagogastric Tumour Board]. Cir Esp. 2013 Oct;91(8):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Apr 11. Spanish.

  • Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak--a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol. 1992 Mar;49(3):163-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930490307.

  • Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM. Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Mar;194(3):285-97. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01177-2.

  • Schroder W, Holscher AH, Bludau M, Vallbohmer D, Bollschweiler E, Gutschow C. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with and without laparoscopic conditioning of the gastric conduit. World J Surg. 2010 Apr;34(4):738-43. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0403-x.

  • Metzger R, Bollschweiler E, Vallbohmer D, Maish M, DeMeester TR, Holscher AH. High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality? Dis Esophagus. 2004;17(4):310-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00431.x.

  • Liebermann-Meffert DM, Meier R, Siewert JR. Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992 Dec;54(6):1110-5. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90077-h.

  • Boyle NH, Pearce A, Hunter D, Owen WJ, Mason RC. Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry and intraluminal recirculating gas tonometry in the assessment of gastric and jejunal perfusion during oesophageal resection. Br J Surg. 1998 Oct;85(10):1407-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00943.x.

  • Urschel JD. Ischemic conditioning of the rat stomach: implications for esophageal replacement with stomach. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1995 Apr;36(2):191-3.

  • Yuan Y, Duranceau A, Ferraro P, Martin J, Liberman M. Vascular conditioning of the stomach before esophageal reconstruction by gastric interposition. Dis Esophagus. 2012 Nov-Dec;25(8):740-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01311.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

  • Akiyama S, Kodera Y, Sekiguchi H, Kasai Y, Kondo K, Ito K, Takagi H. Preoperative embolization therapy for esophageal operation. J Surg Oncol. 1998 Dec;69(4):219-23. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199812)69:43.0.co;2-7.

  • Isomura T, Itoh S, Endo T, Akiyama S, Maruyama K, Ishiguchi T, Ishigaki T, Takagi H. Efficacy of gastric blood supply redistribution by transarterial embolization: preoperative procedure to prevent postoperative anastomotic leaks following esophagoplasty for esophageal carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1999 Mar-Apr;22(2):119-23. doi: 10.1007/s002709900346.

  • Lamas S, Azuara D, de Oca J, Sans M, Farran L, Alba E, Escalante E, Rafecas A. Time course of necrosis/apoptosis and neovascularization during experimental gastric conditioning. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(4):370-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00772.x.

  • Farran L, Miro M, Alba E, Bettonica C, Aranda H, Galan M, Rafecas A. Preoperative gastric conditioning in cervical gastroplasty. Dis Esophagus. 2011 May;24(4):205-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01115.x. Epub 2010 Oct 11.

Study Officials

  • Leandre F Teixidor, Ph D, MD

    Bellvitge University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief of oesophagogastric surgery department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2015

First Posted

May 4, 2015

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion

May 1, 2019

Study Completion

June 1, 2019

Last Updated

August 20, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Locations