Machine Learning to Predict Clinical Response to TMS
LEARN
1 other identifier
observational
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common and debilitating illness. It affects a person's family and personal relationships, work, education, and life. It changes sleeping and eating habits and significantly impairs patients' general health. The disorder affects Veterans more than the general population, both as an isolated illness and in conjunction with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and suicidality. Symptoms in a notable proportion of patients (\~30%) do not respond to behavioral and pharmacological interventions, and new treatments are in great need. One such treatment, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), has been cleared by Food and Drug Administration for treatment in MDD. TMS is effective in around 60% of patients with treatment-resistant MDD but is associated with significant financial and time burden. Further insights into the neurobiological effects of TMS and markers for functional recovery prediction and treatment progression are of great value. The goal of this proposal is to use human electrophysiology (electroencephalography, hereafter EEG, in particular) and machine learning to predict treatment response in candidates for TMS treatment and also study TMS's mechanism of action. Doing so has several benefits for patients, as prediction of treatment helps providers in screening out the patients for whom TMS is ineffective and understanding the mechanism allows us to refine and individualize the treatment. The investigators will recruit 35 patients with treatment-resistant MDD and record resting state EEG signal with a dense electrode array before and after a 6-week clinical course of TMS treatment. The investigators will use machine learning (Sparse regressions) to predict treatment outcome using functional connectivity (Coherence) maps derived from the EEG signal. The investigators also will use classifiers to track changes in functional connectivity through the course of treatment. Based on our preliminary data, the investigators hypothesize that weaker functional connectivity between prefrontal cortex (where the stimulation is delivered) and parietal/posterior midline sites predict better response to treatment and that TMS treatment will enhance these connections. The data collected here would be used as a seed and preliminary data for future federal (NIH and the VA) career development awards which will focus on the use of EEG to better understand brain function and neuromodulation treatments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 22, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 18, 2020
CompletedFebruary 25, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.9 years
January 29, 2019
February 21, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes in functional connectivity maps (i.e., EEG coherence) in patients before and after clinical TMS
The investigators test the hypothesis that TMS modulates cortical networks in a predictable/reproducible way, by using machine learning algorithms (classifiers) to identify changes in post-treatment EEG functional connectivity (quantified by calculating EEG signal Coherence) at different frequency bands (Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Theta).
Clinical symptoms are assessed and the EEG signal is recorded twice within 2 weeks before the first treatment session, twice in the 2 weeks following the last treatment session (typically 36th session), and at 3 and 6-month following the last treatment.
Prediction of clinical outcomes based on pre-treatment EEG functional connectivity
The investigators will use baseline/pre-treatment cortical functional connectivity (quantified by calculating EEG signal Coherence), to predict clinical response to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation treatment in patients with Major Depressive Disorder. The ability to predict the outcome would be assessed by calculating the coefficient of determination (R2).
Clinical symptoms are assessed and the EEG signal is recorded twice within 2 weeks before the first treatment session. The two recordings would be used to asses test-retest validity.
Study Arms (1)
Treatment resistant Major Depressive Disorder
Interventions
Patient receive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for treatment resistant depression as part of their routine care.
Eligibility Criteria
Adult Veterans, of any sex, ages 18-65, with MDD will participate in the study at the Providence VAMC. The patients will be referred by their providers for standard neuromodulation treatment, as happens currently.
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of MDD, assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview of DSM-5 (SCID)
- treatment-resistant, operationally defined as failure to achieve clinical remission (MADRS \<7) remit following at least one antidepressant trial in the current major depressive episode.
- Symptoms must be of at least moderate severity (MADRS score \>19)
- medications will be stable for at least six weeks prior to TMS, and there will be no dose changes unless medically necessary
You may not qualify if:
- \* Standard contraindications to TMS and EEG :
- metal in the head and neck
- history of serious head injury or loss of consciousness over 10 minutes
- dementia
- seizure history
- other serious neurological disorders
- serious or unstable medical conditions that would affect EEG signal
- current severe substance use disorders (except for nicotine or caffeine)
- bipolar or psychotic-spectrum disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, etc.)
- Prior non-responders to TMS will also be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brown Universitylead
- Providence VA Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Providence VA Medical Center
Providence, Rhode Island, 02908, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amin Zand Vakili, MD, PhD
Brown University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2019
First Posted
February 20, 2019
Study Start
October 22, 2018
Primary Completion
September 18, 2020
Study Completion
September 18, 2020
Last Updated
February 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share