NCT03847103

Brief Summary

Task-specific repetitive training, an usual care in occupational therapy practice, and robotic-aided rehabilitation with bilateral practice to improve limb's movement control has been popularised; however the difference in treatment effects between this two therapeutic strategies has been rarely described. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted therapy with bilateral practice (RTBP) and usual care on task and motor performance for chronic stroke patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
43

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 15, 2014

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 2, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 2, 2017

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2019

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 20, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 1, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

February 12, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 27, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

StrokeRobotic-Assisted TherapyBilateral PracticeTask-specific TrainingRehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in the result of Motor Activity Log

    Motor activity log is a structured interview with testing sensitivity used to examine how much (amount of use, AOU) and how well (quality of movement, QOM) the subject uses their more-affected arm. For the 30 items MAL, each item is scored on a 0-5-ordinal scale.

    Baseline, endpoint (4 weeks) and follow-up (16 weeks) assessments

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in the result of Fugl-Meyer assessment for UE motor function

    Baseline, endpoint (4 weeks) and follow-up (16 weeks) assessments

  • Change in root mean square (RMS) value and the median frequency of the power spectrum of each detected motor unit action potential during maximum voluntary contraction

    Baseline, endpoint (4 weeks) and follow-up (16 weeks) assessments

Study Arms (2)

Robotic-aided rehabilitation with bilateral practice

EXPERIMENTAL

In addition to a 10-minutes sensorimotor stimulation programs, the experimental group received 40-minutes Robotic-assisted Therapy with Bilateral Practice programs.

Other: Robotic-assisted Therapy with Bilateral PracticeOther: Sensorimotor Stimulation Program

Unilateral task-specific training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In addition to a 10-minutes sensorimotor stimulation programs, the control subjects received 40-minute unilateral task-specific training.

Other: Unilateral Task-specific TrainingOther: Sensorimotor Stimulation Program

Interventions

40-minute robotic-assisted therapy with bilateral practice program for wrist and forearm repetitive movement training was performed during each session.

Robotic-aided rehabilitation with bilateral practice

40 -minute unilateral task-specific training using various tasks: picks up beans with spoon, pouring water from one glass to another glass, opening and closing a drawer, drinking from a mug, and wiping the table were chosen for facilitating multitude of upper extremity functions. Three tasks per session were chosen for various specific components of hand-arm function training.

Unilateral task-specific training

10-minute sensorimotor stimulation program with repetitive range of motion exercises of upper extremity, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and Rood approach

Robotic-aided rehabilitation with bilateral practiceUnilateral task-specific training

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • chronic stroke patients with unilateral cerebral infarction or hemorrhage and whose disease duration was more than six months following stroke
  • no evidence of any other cerebral pathology in study screening CT scan
  • a score for the Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor assessment ranging from 23-53 corresponding to poor to notable arm-hand capacity
  • pre stroke ability to speak the Chinese
  • without any other possible somatic sensory impairment, no major cognitive-perceptual deficit based on the results of selective neuropsychological tests, such as the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Lowenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment (LOTCA)
  • premorbid right-handedness

You may not qualify if:

  • less than six months following stroke
  • CT shows multiple cerebral infarction or hemorrhage
  • whose comprehension skills were insufficient to understand instructions
  • individuals whose score of MMSE was lower than 24 or sub-item scores of visual perception, spatial perception, praxis, and visuomotor organization in LOTCA was lower than 8, 6, 6, and 14, respectively
  • premorbid left-handedness

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Tainan, 704, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Hsu HY, Chiu HY, Kuan TS, Tsai CL, Su FC, Kuo LC. Robotic-assisted therapy with bilateral practice improves task and motor performance in the upper extremities of chronic stroke patients: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Oct;66(5):637-647. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12602. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2019

First Posted

February 20, 2019

Study Start

April 15, 2014

Primary Completion

March 2, 2017

Study Completion

March 2, 2017

Last Updated

March 1, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Locations