Study Stopped
Due to difficulties with enrollment which were complicated by pauses to clinical research from COVID, The University of Texas Southwestern has decided not to pursue the continuation of this study.
Avazzia-University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center-Tennant Biomodulator® PRO Perfusion Study
Study to Evaluate the Tennant Biomodulator® PRO Device Designed by AVAZZIA Effects on Perfusion
1 other identifier
interventional
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is an open label trial designed to test the effectiveness of the Tennant Biomodulator® PRO electrical stimulation device (Avazzia), which uses BEST™ (Bio-Electric Stimulation Technology), on hospital in-patients to improve perfusion in the treated and contralateral limb.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 24, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 12, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 12, 2021
CompletedAugust 30, 2021
August 1, 2021
2 years
February 7, 2019
August 25, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Improvement in perfusion up to 3 hours
Change in skin perfusion will be assessed by Skin Perfusion Pressure Test (SPP)
3 hours
Improvement in perfusion up to 3 hours
Change in skin perfusion will be assessed by Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI)
3 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Duration of BEST-induced perfusion effects
3 hours
Changes in reported pain after BEST™ (Bio-Electric Stimulation Technology) administration, at the point perfusion returns to baseline, and at 24 hours after treatment
24 hours
Study Arms (1)
Electrical stimulation
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
High-voltage pulsed current (HVPC) electrical stimulation with Reactions and BEST™ (Bio-Electric Stimulation Technology) microcurrent that measure and change with tissue electrical characteristics.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to provide Informed Consent
- Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) ≥ 0.5 (bedside ABI is acceptable for screening purposes as the formal imaging ABI may not be resulted prior to therapy)
- Participant is a hospital in-patient for the duration of study procedures
- One or more chronic lower extremity wounds that are located in the ankle area or below that has persisted a minimum of 30 days prior to the Screening visit
- years of age or older
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to provide informed consent
- \<18 years of age
- Participant has a demand-type cardiac pacemaker, implanted defibrillator or other implanted metallic or electronic device.
- Participant has untreated osteomyelitis
- Participant has active cellulitis
- Participant has active charcot
- Is pregnant or plans to become pregnant
- Is nursing or actively lactating
- Developmental disability/significant psychological disorder that in the opinion of the investigator could impair the participant's ability to provide informed consent, participate in the study protocol including untreated schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and psychiatric hospitalization within the last 2 years.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Avazzia, Inclead
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centercollaborator
- Lawrence A. Lavery, DPM, MPHcollaborator
- Kathryn Davis, Ph.D.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Plastic Surgery
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Related Publications (4)
Thakral G, Lafontaine J, Najafi B, Talal TK, Kim P, Lavery LA. Electrical stimulation to accelerate wound healing. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2013 Sep 16;4. doi: 10.3402/dfa.v4i0.22081.
PMID: 24049559BACKGROUNDPeters EJ, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, Bosma J, Stacpoole-Shea S, Lavery LA. The benefit of electrical stimulation to enhance perfusion in persons with diabetes mellitus. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1998 Sep-Oct;37(5):396-400; discussion 447-8. doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(98)80048-3.
PMID: 9798171BACKGROUNDNair HKR. Microcurrent as an adjunct therapy to accelerate chronic wound healing and reduce patient pain. J Wound Care. 2018 May 2;27(5):296-306. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.5.296.
PMID: 29738296BACKGROUNDAndrushko JW, Lanovaz JL, Bjorkman KM, Kontulainen SA, Farthing JP. Unilateral strength training leads to muscle-specific sparing effects during opposite homologous limb immobilization. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Apr 1;124(4):866-876. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00971.2017. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
PMID: 29357520BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lawrence A Lavery, DPM, MPH
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Plastic Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2019
First Posted
February 18, 2019
Study Start
April 24, 2019
Primary Completion
April 12, 2021
Study Completion
April 12, 2021
Last Updated
August 30, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08