Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Serlopitant for the Treatment of Chronic Pruritus of Unknown Origin
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Serlopitant for the Treatment of Chronic Pruritus of Unknown Origin
1 other identifier
interventional
233
1 country
41
Brief Summary
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Serlopitant for the Treatment of Chronic Pruritus of Unknown Origin
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
41 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 21, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 23, 2020
CompletedMay 20, 2021
May 1, 2021
11 months
February 12, 2019
August 13, 2020
May 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale 4-point Responder Rate at Week 10
During the study, Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) assessments was reported by the subject via eDiary. The daily NRS results were summarized. The daily results were averaged to create weekly measures. The Itch NRS is a validated, self-reported, instrument for measurement of itch intensity. It used a 24-hour recall period and asked subjects to rate the intensity of their itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable), higher scores indicated greater itch intensity. A subject was a 4-point responder if their change from baseline is ≤ -4 (i.e. a decrease of at least 4).
At Week 10
WI-NRS 4-point Responder Rate at Weeks 2 4, 6, and 8
During the study, Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) assessments was reported by the subject via eDiary. The daily NRS results were summarized. The daily results were averaged to create weekly measures. The Itch NRS is a validated, self-reported, instrument for measurement of itch intensity. It used a 24-hour recall period and asked subjects to rate the intensity of their itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable), higher scores indicated greater itch intensity. A subject was a 4-point responder if their change from baseline is ≤ -4 (i.e. a decrease of at least 4).
At Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8
WI-NRS 3-point Responder Rate at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10
During the study, Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) assessments was reported by the subject via eDiary. The daily NRS results were summarized. The daily results were averaged to create weekly measures. The Itch NRS is a validated, self-reported, instrument for measurement of itch intensity. It used a 24-hour recall period and asked subjects to rate the intensity of their itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable), higher scores indicated greater itch intensity. A subject was a 3-point responder if their change from baseline is ≤ -3 (i.e. a decrease of at least 3). Results presented below is of subjects who were a 3-point responder but not a 4-point responder.
At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10
Change From Baseline in WI-NRS at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10
During the study, Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) assessments was reported by the subject via eDiary. The daily NRS results were summarized. The daily results were averaged to create weekly measures. The Itch NRS is a validated, self-reported, instrument for measurement of itch intensity. It used a 24-hour recall period and asked subjects to rate the intensity of their itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable), higher scores indicated greater itch intensity.
At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10
Change From Baseline in Daily WI-NRS Scores Through Week 2
During the study, Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) assessments was reported by the subject via eDiary. The daily NRS results were summarized. The daily results were averaged to create weekly measures. The Itch NRS is a validated, self-reported, instrument for measurement of itch intensity. It used a 24-hour recall period and asked subjects to rate the intensity of their itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable), higher scores indicated greater itch intensity.
Through 2 weeks
Change From Baseline in Worst-Itch Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10
The Itch Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a validated, self-reported instrument for measurement of itch intensity. It used a 24-hour recall period and asked subjects to rate the worst intensity of their itch on a 100-mm horizontal line ranging from 0 mm (no itch) to 100 mm (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated greater itch intensity. The VAS measurement were summarized in centimeters. WI-VAS assessments were reported by the subject via a paper form administered at study visits.
At Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
From screening until the Follow-up (F/U) visit which occurred 35 days (+ 7 days) after the Week 10 visit or the last dose of study drug for subjects who discontinued study drug early.
Plasma Concentrations of Serlopitant and Metabolites
At Week 10
Study Arms (2)
5 mg Serlopitant Tablets
EXPERIMENTALSerlopitant Tablets
5 mg Placebo Tablets
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo Tablets
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, age 18 years or older at consent.
- The subject must have ongoing chronic pruritus
- The subject's pruritus is assessed by the investigator to be of unknown origin at baseline.
- Worst-Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score in the 24-hour period prior to the Screening visit, and average weekly WI-NRS score in each of the 2 weeks prior to Baseline visit indicating an appropriate pruritus level for the study.
- The pruritus must have been unresponsive to prior treatment with emollients.
- The subject's pruritus must be present on multiple segments of the body
- Willing and able to complete daily eDiary entries within a consistent timeframe for the duration of the study
- All females who are of childbearing potential must be willing to practice highly effective contraception and not be pregnant or nursing
- Willing to comply with study visits and study related requirements including providing written informed consent.
- Adequate cognitive and physical ability, in the investigator's opinion, to comply with study visits and study related requirements including providing written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Prior treatment with any NK1-receptor antagonists
- Known dermatologic or systemic condition(s), other than dry skin, that is considered by the investigator to be the primary cause of current pruritus.
- Untreated or inadequately treated thyroid, adrenal, or pituitary disease or nodules, or history of thyroid malignancy.
- Use of an excluded therapy within 3 weeks prior to randomization
- Treatment with any investigational therapy within 3 weeks prior to randomization.
- Serum creatinine, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase \> 2.5 times the upper limit of normal during screening.
- History of malignancy within 3 years prior to randomization, with the (actinic keratosis, non-metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma of skin).
- Any known major psychiatric diagnosis that would impact the subject's ability to complete the study
- Suicidal ideation within 3 years prior to randomization, or any history of suicide attempt.
- Known use of recreational drugs.
- Documented history of parasitic infection, including skin parasites such as scabies, within 12 weeks prior to randomization.
- Presence of clinically significant dementia, intellectual impairment, or any medical condition or disability that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with the assessment of safety or efficacy in this trial or compromise the safety of the subject.
- History of hypersensitivity to serlopitant or any of its components.
- Planned or anticipated major surgical procedure or other activity that would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol-mandated assessments (e.g. extended international travel) during the subject's participation in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (41)
Study Site 221
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 72022, United States
Study Site 823
Bakersfield, California, 93301, United States
Study Site 204
Fremont, California, 94538, United States
Study Site 803
Los Angeles, California, 90045, United States
Study Site 820
Centennial, Colorado, 80112, United States
Study Site 804
Denver, Colorado, 80210, United States
Study Site 811
Aventura, Florida, 33180, United States
Study Site 801
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256, United States
Study Site 807
Miami, Florida, 33137, United States
Study Site 331
Miami, Florida, 33144, United States
Study Site 824
Sarasota, Florida, 34239, United States
Study Site 818
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33406, United States
Study Site 349
Savannah, Georgia, 31406, United States
Study Site 814
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250, United States
Study Site 808
Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135, United States
Study Site 822
Rolla, Missouri, 65401, United States
Study Site 371
Saint Joseph, Missouri, 64506, United States
Study Site 817
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Study Site 821
Bellevue, Nebraska, 68123, United States
Study Site 813
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128, United States
Study Site 387
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148, United States
Study Site 816
Morristown, New Jersey, 07960, United States
Study Site 121
Ocean Township, New Jersey, 07712, United States
Study Site 507
Brooklyn, New York, 11203, United States
Study Site 802
The Bronx, New York, 10458, United States
Study Site 341
High Point, North Carolina, 27262, United States
Study Site 810
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Study Site 524
Dublin, Ohio, 43016, United States
Study Site 116
Portland, Oregon, 97202, United States
Study Site 522
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Study Site 345
Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919, United States
Study Site 815
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886, United States
Study Site 805
Nashville, Tennessee, 37215, United States
Study Site 365
Austin, Texas, 78745, United States
Study Site 120
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
Study Site 819
Fort Worth, Texas, 76244, United States
Study Site 359
Pflugerville, Texas, 78660, United States
Study Site 809
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Study Site 217
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States
Study Site 806
Spokane, Washington, 99202, United States
Study Site 812
Walla Walla, Washington, 09362, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Iain Stuart
- Organization
- Menlo Therapeutics, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2019
First Posted
February 15, 2019
Study Start
January 22, 2019
Primary Completion
December 10, 2019
Study Completion
January 21, 2020
Last Updated
May 20, 2021
Results First Posted
September 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2021-05