NCT03838224

Brief Summary

Neck pain is the 3rd cause of disability worldwide and represents an enormous socioeconomic burden. It has been reported that people with neck pain, with traumatic and non-traumatic onset, have an alteration of the sensorimotor function compared to pain-free people, such as deficits in the head and neck repositioning or alteration of the body balance. It has been suggested that alterations on the proprioception of the suboccipital muscles may cause a decrease in head and neck repositioning accuracy and changes in head and neck positioning patterns. The suboccipital muscles, particularly the obliquus capitis inferior (OCI), has a greater density of muscular spindles compared to lower cervical segments, which is believed to play an important role in the proprioception. The alteration of the JPE is more often found in patients with a dysfunction in the upper cervical spine, but people with lower dysfunction can also exhibit it. However, no conclusive results on JPE have been reported with articular techniques targeting the upper cervical spine. On the contrary, positive results on this test have been observed after the retraining of the upper cervical muscles. As OCI is a deep muscle, dry needling seems to be the most appropriate passive modality of treatment to target that muscle and restore the abnormal cervical sensorimotor control. However, this hypothesis has never been tested.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 29, 2019

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 12, 2019

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 12, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 15, 2019

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

January 29, 2019

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Joint position error (JPE)

    Cervical JPE will be measured using a laser-pointer attached to a lightweight headband. In sitting position, 90 cm away from a target and blindfolded, patients will be requested to rotate to the right and to the left. An absolute error between the starting and end points will be calculated in millimeters and then converted to degrees. Six repetitions will be performed each side according to recommendations and the mean will be calculated.

    Baseline, immediate post-intervention follow-up and one-week post-intervention follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Cervical movement sense

    Baseline, immediate post-intervention follow-up and one-week post-intervention follow-up

  • Change in Postural stability

    Baseline, immediate post-intervention follow-up and one-week post-intervention follow-up

  • Change in Active cervical range of motion (rotation)

    Baseline, immediate post-intervention follow-up and one-week post-intervention follow-up

  • Change in Cervical flexion-rotation test (CFRT)

    Baseline, immediate post-intervention follow-up and one-week post-intervention follow-up

  • Change in Smooth pursuit neck torsion (SPNT)

    Baseline, immediate post-intervention follow-up and one-week post-intervention follow-up

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Dry needling

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants allocated in this group will receive a single session of dry needling of the obliquus capitis inferior. Prior to the intervention, participants will receive information about the procedure and will be free to withdraw. The needle was shown to the participant before the intervention. Participants will be requested to lie in prone on the plinth. Participants' skin will be sterilized with antiseptic spray for the skin. The therapist will clean his hands and use sterilized gloves.

Other: dry needling

sham needling

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham needling has shown to be a valid control method in dry needling research. The procedure in the sham group will be the same as the experimental group to guarantee the participants' blinding. Prior to the intervention, participants will receive information about the procedure and will be free to withdraw. The sham needle (same appearance/material as the true needle) was shown to the participant before the intervention to guarantee the blinding.

Other: Sham needling

Interventions

Participants allocated in this group will receive a single session of dry needling of the obliquus capitis inferior. Prior to the intervention, participants will receive information about the procedure and will be free to withdraw. The needle was shown to the participant before the intervention. Participants will be requested to lie in prone on the plinth. Participants' skin will be sterilized with antiseptic spray for the skin. The therapist will clean his hands and use sterilized gloves. The needle will be moved up and down within the muscle, using a "fast-in and fast-out" technique. Needle insertions will be repeated 12 times.

Dry needling

Sham needling has shown to be a valid control method in dry needling research. The procedure in the sham group will be the same as the experimental group to guarantee the participants' blinding. Prior to the intervention, participants will receive information about the procedure and will be free to withdraw. The sham needle (same appearance/material as the true needle) was shown to the participant before the intervention to guarantee the blinding.

sham needling

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Neck pain longer than 3 months (traumatic or non-traumatic)
  • Neck disability index (NDI) ≥10
  • Visual analogue scale (VAS) ≥3
  • Joint position error (JPE) ≥4.5º determined in the physical examination prior to enrollment

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous cervical spine surgery
  • Spine fracture
  • Any neurological signs
  • Cervical stenosis
  • Needle phobia/fear of needles
  • Anticoagulant medication consumption
  • Pregnancy
  • Known or suspected vestibular pathology
  • Vertigo or dizziness from ear or brain disorders, sensory nerve pathways (e.g. BPPV).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Valencia

Valencia, 46010, Spain

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Jull G, Falla D, Treleaven J, Hodges P, Vicenzino B. Retraining cervical joint position sense: the effect of two exercise regimes. J Orthop Res. 2007 Mar;25(3):404-12. doi: 10.1002/jor.20220.

    PMID: 17143898BACKGROUND
  • Kulkarni V, Chandy MJ, Babu KS. Quantitative study of muscle spindles in suboccipital muscles of human foetuses. Neurol India. 2001 Dec;49(4):355-9.

    PMID: 11799407BACKGROUND
  • Mitchell UH, Stoneman P, Larson RE, Page GL. The Construction of Sham Dry Needles and Their Validity. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Jun 14;2018:9567061. doi: 10.1155/2018/9567061. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30013605BACKGROUND
  • Reid SA, Callister R, Katekar MG, Rivett DA. Effects of cervical spine manual therapy on range of motion, head repositioning, and balance in participants with cervicogenic dizziness: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1603-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 2.

    PMID: 24792139BACKGROUND
  • Revel M, Andre-Deshays C, Minguet M. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with cervical pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Apr;72(5):288-91.

    PMID: 2009044BACKGROUND
  • Treleaven J, Clamaron-Cheers C, Jull G. Does the region of pain influence the presence of sensorimotor disturbances in neck pain disorders? Man Ther. 2011 Dec;16(6):636-40. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

    PMID: 21890397BACKGROUND
  • Hallgren RC, Andary MT, Wyman AJ, Rowan JJ. A standardized protocol for needle placement in suboccipital muscles. Clin Anat. 2008 Sep;21(6):501-8. doi: 10.1002/ca.20660.

    PMID: 18627103BACKGROUND
  • Audette I, Dumas JP, Cote JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):318-23. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180.

    PMID: 20436238BACKGROUND
  • Hall T, Robinson K. The flexion-rotation test and active cervical mobility--a comparative measurement study in cervicogenic headache. Man Ther. 2004 Nov;9(4):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2004.04.004.

    PMID: 15522644BACKGROUND
  • Hall TM, Robinson KW, Fujinawa O, Akasaka K, Pyne EA. Intertester reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 May;31(4):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.03.012.

    PMID: 18486750BACKGROUND
  • Kamper SJ, Grootjans SJ, Michaleff ZA, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Sterling M. Measuring pain intensity in patients with neck pain: does it matter how you do it? Pain Pract. 2015 Feb;15(2):159-67. doi: 10.1111/papr.12169. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

    PMID: 24433369BACKGROUND
  • Silva AG, Cruz AL. Standing balance in patients with whiplash-associated neck pain and idiopathic neck pain when compared with asymptomatic participants: A systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013 Jan;29(1):1-18. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2012.677111. Epub 2012 Apr 20.

    PMID: 22515180BACKGROUND
  • Swait G, Rushton AB, Miall RC, Newell D. Evaluation of cervical proprioceptive function: optimizing protocols and comparison between tests in normal subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):E692-701. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5a1b.

    PMID: 18007229BACKGROUND
  • Takasaki H, Hall T, Oshiro S, Kaneko S, Ikemoto Y, Jull G. Normal kinematics of the upper cervical spine during the Flexion-Rotation Test - In vivo measurements using magnetic resonance imaging. Man Ther. 2011 Apr;16(2):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

    PMID: 21055995BACKGROUND
  • Werner IM, Ernst MJ, Treleaven J, Crawford RJ. Intra and interrater reliability and clinical feasibility of a simple measure of cervical movement sense in patients with neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Oct 5;19(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2287-0.

    PMID: 30290759BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Interventions

Dry Needling

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Complementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy Modalities

Study Officials

  • Enrique Lluch, PhD

    Physiotherapy Department University of Valencia

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2019

First Posted

February 12, 2019

Study Start

March 12, 2019

Primary Completion

June 15, 2019

Study Completion

June 30, 2019

Last Updated

August 13, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Locations