Gun Locks in Firearm Suicide Intervention
The Provision of Gun Locks in Lethal Means Counseling to Increase Firearm Safety in a Suicide Risk Sample
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares the effectiveness of two interventions for suicide over the course of a month. The experimental intervention includes the provision of a gun lock with video instructions, in addition to standard suicide risk interventions (i.e., standardized full suicide risk assessment, safety planning, and lethal means counseling). The comparison intervention group will receive the same standard suicide risk interventions without the gun lock and video. The targeted outcome will be level of engagement in gun safety behaviors (e.g., using a gun lock, using a gun safe, considering getting rid of guns). It is predicted that the experimental intervention will result in greater increases over time in engagement in gun safety behaviors, as compared to the comparison intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 2, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 2, 2022
CompletedApril 8, 2022
April 1, 2022
2.4 years
February 4, 2019
April 6, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Engagement in Firearm Safety Behaviors
This includes a variety of actions and thinking patterns that promote safety regarding firearms. This is measured by a self-report instrument (Engagement in Firearm Safety Behaviors; Stanley, 2018), which contains 34 items. The items are scored on a Likert scale (i.e., 0 = Never; 1 = Sometimes, 2 = Often, 3 = Always) to gauge frequency of engagement. 16 items represent behaviors (e.g., "using a gun lock," "trading in your guns") and 18 represent thoughts (e.g., "thought about obtaining a gun lock," "thought about storing your gun unloaded.")
Immediately prior to intervention
Engagement in Firearm Safety Behaviors
This includes a variety of actions and thinking patterns that promote safety regarding firearms. This is measured by a self-report instrument (Engagement in Firearm Safety Behaviors; Stanley, 2018), which contains 34 items. The items are scored on a Likert scale (i.e., 0 = Never; 1 = Sometimes, 2 = Often, 3 = Always) to gauge frequency of engagement. 16 items represent behaviors (e.g., "using a gun lock," "trading in your guns") and 18 represent thoughts (e.g., "thought about obtaining a gun lock," "thought about storing your gun unloaded.")
Two weeks after intervention
Engagement in Firearm Safety Behaviors
This includes a variety of actions and thinking patterns that promote safety regarding firearms. This is measured by a self-report instrument (Engagement in Firearm Safety Behaviors; Stanley, 2018), which contains 34 items. The items are scored on a Likert scale (i.e., 0 = Never; 1 = Sometimes, 2 = Often, 3 = Always) to gauge frequency of engagement. 16 items represent behaviors (e.g., "using a gun lock," "trading in your guns") and 18 represent thoughts (e.g., "thought about obtaining a gun lock," "thought about storing your gun unloaded.")
One month after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Intentions to Adhere to Clinician Recommendations
Immediately prior to Intervention
Intentions to Adhere to Clinician Recommendations
Immediately after intervention
Intentions to Adhere to Clinician Recommendations
Two weeks after intervention
Intentions to Adhere to Clinician Recommendations
One month after intervention
Acceptability of Intervention
Immediately prior to intervention
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Gun lock
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be provided a gun lock and video instructions for its proper use, in addition to standard suicide risk interventions (i.e., standardized full suicide risk assessment, safety planning, lethal means counseling).
Standard intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will be provided standard suicide risk interventions (i.e., standardized full suicide risk assessment, safety planning, lethal means counseling) without a gun lock. A gun lock and video instructions will be provided upon completion of the study.
Interventions
A cable-style gun lock that can be applied to a wide variety of guns for safe storage. The application of this device to most firearms renders them impossible to use properly while the device is in place and locked.
Thorough suicide risk assessment according to guidelines established by research (Joiner et al., 1999; Chu et al., 2015). This is used to determine the severity of suicide risk and appropriate actions to be taken.
A psychological intervention for suicide risk that is based on research (Chu et al., 2015; Stanley \& Brown, 2012). This involves listing the following on an index card: activities individuals can use to feel better during a crisis, contact numbers that are important to the individuals, emergency options that are always accessible, and reasons for living. Although the individualized nature of safety plans does not allow for a scripted/uniform approach, for this study they will all include 8 steps and steps 5-8 (emergency options) will be the same for each individual.
A psychological intervention for suicide risk that is based on research (Bryan et al., 2011; Chu et al., 2015; Rudd, 2006; Stanley, 2018). This involves a psychological clinician discussing, with an at-risk individual, the importance for increasing the distance/obstacles between the individual at risk for suicide and specific types of lethal means. In the present study, the lethal means targeted was firearms and the lethal means counseling approach was able to be standardized/scripted as has been done in previous research (see Stanley, 2018).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must own and have access to a firearm
- Must have at least one lifetime episode of suicide ideation
- Must be 18 years of age or older
You may not qualify if:
- \- May not be under 18 years of age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Florida State University
Tallahassee, Florida, 32306, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Thomas E Joiner, PhD
Robert O. Lawton Distinguished Professor
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bruno Chiurliza, MS
Graduate Student
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Participants are informed that the purpose of the study is to "test the effects that providing gun locks as part of a psychological intervention has on gun safety behaviors" and that there are two treatment groups and that one is a "gun lock" group and that one is "standard intervention" group.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2019
First Posted
February 8, 2019
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 2, 2022
Study Completion
April 2, 2022
Last Updated
April 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04