A System of Safety (SOS)
SOS
A System of Safety: Preventing Suicided Through Healthcare System Transformation
2 other identifiers
interventional
493,756
1 country
1
Brief Summary
SOS will identify evidence based best practices consistent with Zero Suicide's six specific recommended clinical actions (A.2.) and use them to develop standardized clinical protocols for each care setting, clinical unit, population serviced, and clinical discipline. Using Lean CQI, the investigators will tailor, implement, and improve adherence to these protocols. To support feasibility, SOS will use a phased roll out and a hub-and-spoke design. The intervention targets will be suicide-related clinician behaviors. The investigators will aspire to adopt best practices and measure all six recommended performance elements; however, for feasibility, the research evaluation will focus on suicide risk screening, safety planning, means restriction counseling, and post-acute care follow-up calls. The primary patient outcomes will be suicide risk identification, suicide, suicide attempts, and suicide-related emergencies requiring acute care. The investigators will examine potential mechanisms of action and moderators, and conduct a cost effectiveness analysis of SOS versus usual care. The investigators will employ a stepped wedge design and follow individuals for 6 to 54 months. Outcomes, clinician behaviors, and other variables will be gathered through: (1) EHR data extraction, (2) claims data from UMMHC and the MA All Payer Claims Database, (3) random medical chart abstractions, (4) MA state vital statistics and National Death Index (NDI), (5) clinician surveys, (6) Lean evaluations and process observations, and (7) patient fidelity interviews. Data will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedMarch 12, 2024
March 1, 2024
7.3 years
April 3, 2017
March 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Standardized suicide risk screening
A completed suicide screen will be defined as any chart documentation of the presence OR absence of suicidal ideation AND presence or absence of a past suicide attempt (0=None documented, 1=Partial (+/- ideation OR attempt noted), 2=Complete (+/- ideation AND attempt noted).
6 months after the Index ED Visit
Safety planning
A safety plan will be defined as a written document collaboratively developed with the patient identifying steps to take when feeling suicidal. We will code it as 0=None, no documentation of a safety plan, 1=Partial (e.g., some steps but not all completed), or 2=Complete (all six steps completed).
6 months after the Index ED Visit
Means restriction counseling
a step in the Safety Plan Intervention includes means restriction counseling. We will code it as 0=None, no documentation of means restriction counseling, 1=Complete, documentation of means restriction counseling.
6 months after the Index ED Visit
Care transition facilitation
Include post-acute telephone phone call follow-up to foster engagement with outpatient care and problem solving within 24 hours of discharge (0 = Not completed, 1 = Completed).
6 months after the Index ED Visit
Suicide risk identification
A positive screen (i.e., identification) will be defined as patient endorsement of active ideation OR report of a lifetime suicide attempt. We will also examine ICD-10 codes assigned to each visit within claims data.
6 months after the Index ED Visit
Suicide outcomes
Suicide will be ascertained through MA vital statistics review with the DPH Suicide Prevention Program. We will match definite and suspected suicides against the study population. Suicide attempt will be defined as an ED visit or a hospitalization with: an ICD-10 code (i.e., intentional self-injury) OR Positive suicide attempt on an encounter day per the EHR templated screener. Suicide-related acute healthcare encounter will be defined as a suicide attempt (same criteria as above) OR a ICD-10 code (i.e., suicidal ideation) OR positive screen for suicidal ideation per the EHR templated screener
6 months after the Index ED Visit
Study Arms (2)
No Intervention
NO INTERVENTIONBaseline Retrospective Chart Reviews that are conducted on subjects for the one year period prior to the implementation of the study will serve as the control.
Intervention
OTHERThe intervention targets will be the following suicide-related clinician behaviors. * suicide risk screening * safety planning * means restriction counseling * Post-acute care follow-up calls A Lean Implementation Strategy: The Implementation of the intervention targets guided by Lean; is expected to increase suicide-related clinician behaviors
Interventions
Suicide risk screening will be implemented as the standard of care for all patients who present for treatment.
Suicide screen-positive patients who are to be discharged from the hospital will receive personalized safety planning by a mental health clinician or nurse that includes means restriction counseling as a step in the safety plan.
Include post-acute telephone phone call follow-up to foster engagement with outpatient care and problem solving within 24 hours of discharge
The Interventions will be implemented using Lean performance improvement strategies
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients \>12 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \<12 years old
- Adults unable to consent
- Prisoners
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UMass Memorial Health Care
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edwin D Boudreaux, PhD
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Catarina Kiefe, MD, PhD
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- This was an implementation study that implemented various suicide related best practices into routine care. Data for patients who presented for care were included in the respective phase of the study based on the location and date of presentation. They were not aware they were in a study.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Vice Chair, Director of Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2017
First Posted
April 7, 2017
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
March 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Data will be become available in years, length to be determined.
- Access Criteria
- See plan description
A de-identified database from this study, along with associated database documentation (see below), will be made available online three years after the dataset is closed, without cost to researchers and analysts. NIMH will host the dataset on the NIMH Limited Access Dataset website; access and use will be governed by its policies, which can be found at: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/trials/datasets/nimh-policy-for-distribution-of-data.shtml.