Impact of Patients Risk Factors on the Longevity of Aesthetic Restorations
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this double-blind randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the influence of caries risk, occlusal stress and missing teeth on anterior restorations over a 10 years follow up period. 300 teeth will be randomized according to two adhesive systems: Single Bond 2 and Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE); and two composite resins: nanoparticulated (Filtek â„¢ Z-350- 3M ESPE) and nanohybrid (IPS Empress Direct - Ivoclar Vivadent). The randomization will be stratified according to the risk of caries and cavity type. The primary outcomes will be longevity, annual failure rate (AFR) and the success of the restorations, and the secondary outcome will be causes for restorations' failure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jan 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2022
CompletedFebruary 8, 2019
February 1, 2019
10 years
February 7, 2019
February 7, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Survival of the restorations
Survival of the restoration is defined as any case where the restoration remains functional in the mouth at the time of evaluation, regardless of need of small interventions, such as repair or refurbishment. The restorations were evaluated shortly after baseline and in prospective periods through a direct clinical inspection, with an explorer probe and a clinical mirror, according to the criteria for clinical evaluation of restorations proposed by the FDI (International Dental Federation) (Hickel et al., 2010), the risks of caries and occlusal stress were also evaluated again. Two trained and calibrated evaluators, unrelated to making the restorations, blinded to the type of material used, independently performed the clinical evaluations.
Changes in the dental restorations status compared to baseline will be assessed yearly up to 10 years.
Success of the restorations
Success of the restoration is defined as any case where the restoration remains functional in the mouth at the time of evaluation, without any need of new interventions, and attending the patients demands. The restorations were evaluated shortly after baseline and in prospective periods through a direct clinical inspection, with an explorer probe and a clinical mirror, according to the criteria for clinical evaluation of restorations proposed by the FDI (International Dental Federation) (Hickel et al., 2010), the risks of caries and occlusal stress were also evaluated again.
Changes in the dental restorations status compared to baseline will be assessed yearly up to 10 years.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient satisfaction with the treatment
Changes in the patient's satisfaction status compared to baseline will be assessed yearly up to 10 years.
Study Arms (4)
Nanoparticulated composite - self-etch
ACTIVE COMPARATORNanoparticulated composite - total-etch
ACTIVE COMPARATORNanohybrid composite - self-etch
ACTIVE COMPARATORNanohybrid composite - total-etch
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The restorations will be placed according to the protocol developed for the care, following the guidelines of the manufacturers, with a self-etching dental adhesive (SingleBond Universal, 3M ESPE), selective enamel etching, and use of a nanoparticulated composite (Z350, 3M ESPE)
The restorations will be placed according to the protocol developed for the care, following the guidelines of the manufacturers, with a total-etching dental adhesive (SingleBond 2, 3M ESPE), and use of a nanoparticulated composite (Z350, 3M ESPE)
The restorations will be placed according to the protocol developed for the care, following the guidelines of the manufacturers, with a self-etching dental adhesive (SingleBond Universal, 3M ESPE), selective enamel etching, and use of a nanohybrid composite (IPS Empress Direct, Ivoclar Vivadent).
The restorations will be placed according to the protocol developed for the care, following the guidelines of the manufacturers, with a total-etching dental adhesive (SingleBond 2, 3M ESPE), and use of a nanohybrid composite (IPS Empress Direct, Ivoclar Vivadent).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with restorative needs in anterior teeth;
- Patients able to understand and sign the informed consent form;
- Patients willing to return to follow up.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had a need for Class III and Class IV restorations that did not involve at least 1/3 of the tooth;
- Patients under orthodontic treatment;
- Patients with a compromised general health condition, presenting a greater risk than ASA II, according to the ASA-PS (American Society of Anesthesiologists - Physical Status);
- Patients who had no occlusal contact with an opposing tooth and/or crown;
- Patient with absence of bilateral balanced occlusion;
- Patient with deep caries lesions in close contact with the dental pulp and in need of expectant treatment or direct pulp capping;
- Patients with post-retained need in anterior teeth.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Federal Univeristy of Pelotas
Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, 96015080, Brazil
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maximiliano S Cenci
Graduate Program in Dentistry - Federal University of Pelotas
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2019
First Posted
February 8, 2019
Study Start
January 10, 2012
Primary Completion
January 10, 2022
Study Completion
January 10, 2022
Last Updated
February 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02