Comparison Between CT and MRI in Preoperative Evaluation of Neurogenic Myositis Ossificans or Neurogenic Para-osteo-arthritis
MON-IRM
Preoperative Evaluation of Neurogenic Myositis Ossificans or Neurogenic Para-osteo-arthritis: Comparison Between Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Evaluation
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The principal objective of the study is to compare between CT and MRI diagnostic performance (sensibility and specificity) in the preoperative assessment of neurogenic para-osteo-arthritis. The second objectives of the study are:
- besides the diagnostic performance (sensibility and specificity), to evaluate the imaging par MRI in visual and descriptive manner heterotopic ossification and connection with vascular and nervous structures.
- to study the concordance (two by two) of results of preoperative obtained by MRI and by CT and operative reports.
- to study the characteristics of patients with discordant findings (two by two) by MRI, CT scan and operative report.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 7, 2023
CompletedMarch 16, 2023
March 1, 2023
3.8 years
January 25, 2019
March 15, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Analysis and comparison of accurate topography of heterotopic ossification on the CT and the MRI
Comparison of preoperative diagnostic performances of CT scan and MRI, based on analysis of topography of heterotopic ossification. On each CT and MRI exam, analysis of accurate topography of heterotopic ossifications relative to the bones, the number of fragments, their relationships with the articular capsule, their mineralization, and the mineralization of the underlying bone.
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Analysis and comparison of reporting arterial and venous anatomy
Comparison of preoperative diagnostic performances of CT scan and MRI, based on analysis of reporting arterial and venous anatomy. On each CT and MRI exam, analysis of vascular (arterial and veinous) relations with the heterotopic ossifications, in the case of contact specify the existence of a gutter or a tunnel, and the vessels permeability or occlusion.
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Analysis and comparison of reporting nervous structures
Comparison of preoperative diagnostic performances of CT scan and MRI, based on analysis of reporting nervous structures. On each CT and MRI exam, analysis of nervous structures relations with the heterotopic ossifications, in the case of contact specify the existence of a gutter or a tunnel, and the the existence of suffering nerve or denervation signs.
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Performances of MRI for diagnosis of arterial-venous
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Performances of MRI for diagnosis of nervous structures (nerve's location, nerve signal anomalies, signs of suffering and denervation...)
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Rate of incidence of adverse event during surgical operation
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Concordance correlation coefficient
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Characteristic of patients with discordant results
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Study Arms (1)
Preoperative evaluation: CT + MRI
EXPERIMENTALPreoperative evaluation by 2 examinations: CT scan and MRI. * CT scan with biphasic injection of contrast product; * MRI with injection of contrast.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient with neurogenic para-osteo-arthropathy resulted by prior central nervous system, cerebral or medullar damage
- Deformation with limitation of articular amplitude which could result limitation in rehabilitation care
- An indication of partial or total surgical excision of heterotopic ossification
- Indication of pre-operative assessment by CT scan and MRI, with contrast product injection
- Signed consent of patient obtained after clear and relevant informations given by physician
- Patient covered by social security
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to an MRI examination: cardiac stimulator, metallic intraocular foreign bodies...
- Contraindications to CT scan
- Contraindications to contrast injection product, such as iodinated or gadolinium-based contrast media
- Impractical venous access
- Severe deformation resulting impossibility to positioning for MRI examination or CT scan
- Patient can not give consent
- Participation to another interventional study
- Patient under guardianship
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Service d'Imagerie médicale, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré
Garches, Hauts-de-Seine, 92380, France
Related Publications (1)
Amar R, Thiry T, Salga M, Safa D, Chetrit A, Gatin L, Carlier RY. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for bone assessment of neurogenic heterotopic ossification of the hip: a preliminary study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 20;16(1):725. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02869-6.
PMID: 34930354DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Carlier, MD, PhD
Service d'Imagerie médicale, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Raphaël AMAR, Resident
Service d'Imagerie médicale, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2019
First Posted
February 6, 2019
Study Start
April 30, 2019
Primary Completion
February 7, 2023
Study Completion
February 7, 2023
Last Updated
March 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share