Cyriax Manipulation in Cervical Discogenic Pain
Effects of Cyriax Manipulation in Cervical Discogenic Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this research is to find and compare the effect of traditional physical therapy and Cyriax manipulation on pain, range of motion and disability in patients with cervical discogenic pain. Randomized controlled trials done at Benazir Bhutto hospital, Rawalpindi . The sample size was 40. The subjects were divided in two groups, 20 subjects in traditional physical therapy group and 20 in Cyriax manipulation group. Study duration was of 6 months. Sampling technique applied was purposive non probability sampling technique. Only 25-45 years individual with cervical discogenic pain were included. Tools used in the study are Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and neck disablity index (NDI). Data was be analyzed through SPSS 21.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2019
CompletedMay 20, 2019
May 1, 2019
5 months
January 27, 2019
May 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Neck disability index
Changes from base line Northwick disability index was developed first in Northwick Park hospital, England. It was designed to measure the neck pain and disability over time. It consists of 10, five parts sections. At the end, score is calculated by dividing the obtained score by total (50) multiplied by 100. As the driving section was missing in all the female patients, total score was considered as 45 instead of 50.
4th Day
Secondary Outcomes (7)
NPRS
4th Day
ROM Cervical Spine ( Flexion)
4th Day
ROM Cervical Spine ( extension)
4th Day
ROM Cervical Spine ( Right side flexion)
4th Day
ROM Cervical Spine ( left side Flexion)
4th Day
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Traditional physical therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORCervical isometrics and Muscle Stretching
Cyriax manipulation
EXPERIMENTALExperimental group was given cyriax manipulation protocol along with the cervical isometrics and muscle stretching.
Interventions
Cervical isometrics 10 repetitions×1 set, 4 days/week and targeted muscle strechings (trapezius, scalenes and sternocleidomastoid) 10 repetitions×1 set, 4 days/week. Total of 4 sessions were given each consisting of 40 mins.
Experimental group was given cyriax manipulation protocol along with the cervical isometrics and muscle strechings. Traction with rotation was not given in cases of bilateral arm pain. cervical isometrics 10 repetitions×1 set, 4 days/week and targeted muscle strechings (trapezius, scalenes and sternocleidomastoid) 10 repetitions×1 set, 4 days/week. Total of 4 sessions were given each consisting of 40 mins.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed and confirmed cases of cervical disco genic pain by Weiner's criteria and Cyriax clinical assessment,
- Discogenic cases with pain either in cervico-scapular area, radiating to arm without any neurological symptoms were the main objects of study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients have vertebrobasilar insufficiency (tested by VBI tests),
- Altanto axial instability (tested by sharp purser test),
- Osteoporosis, Rheumatoid arthritis,
- Neuropathies,
- Recent surgeries and neuropathies were excluded from study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Riphah International University
Islamabad, Federal, 44000, Pakistan
Related Publications (10)
Risbud MV, Shapiro IM. Role of cytokines in intervertebral disc degeneration: pain and disc content. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;10(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.160. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
PMID: 24166242BACKGROUNDFejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jun;15(6):834-48. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
PMID: 15999284BACKGROUNDSchoenfeld AJ, George AA, Bader JO, Caram PM Jr. Incidence and epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy in the United States military: 2000 to 2009. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Feb;25(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31820d77ea.
PMID: 21430568BACKGROUNDBurkhardt BW, Brielmaier M, Schwerdtfeger K, Oertel JM. Clinical outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without anterior cervical plating for the treatment of cervical disc herniation-a 25-year follow-up study. Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Apr;41(2):473-482. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0872-6. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
PMID: 28646343BACKGROUNDPhillips FM, Lee JY, Geisler FH, Cappuccino A, Chaput CD, DeVine JG, Reah C, Gilder KM, Howell KM, McAfee PC. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 1;38(15):E907-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318296232f.
PMID: 23591659BACKGROUNDGross AR, Hoving JL, Haines TA, Goldsmith CH, Kay T, Aker P, Bronfort G; Cervical Overview Group. A Cochrane review of manipulation and mobilization for mechanical neck disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jul 15;29(14):1541-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000131218.35875.ed.
PMID: 15247576BACKGROUNDQuesnele JJ, Triano JJ, Noseworthy MD, Wells GD. Changes in vertebral artery blood flow following various head positions and cervical spine manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jan;37(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
PMID: 24239451BACKGROUNDBronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):335-56. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.06.002.
PMID: 15125860BACKGROUNDKoes BW, Bouter LM, van Mameren H, Essers AH, Verstegen GJ, Hofhuizen DM, Houben JP, Knipschild PG. A randomized clinical trial of manual therapy and physiotherapy for persistent back and neck complaints: subgroup analysis and relationship between outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 May;16(4):211-9.
PMID: 8340715BACKGROUNDArnbak B, Jensen TS, Egund N, Zejden A, Horslev-Petersen K, Manniche C, Jurik AG. Prevalence of degenerative and spondyloarthritis-related magnetic resonance imaging findings in the spine and sacroiliac joints in patients with persistent low back pain. Eur Radiol. 2016 Apr;26(4):1191-203. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3903-0. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
PMID: 26194456BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdul Ghafoor Sajjad, PHD*
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2019
First Posted
February 1, 2019
Study Start
January 15, 2018
Primary Completion
June 20, 2018
Study Completion
June 30, 2018
Last Updated
May 20, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share