NCT03826784

Brief Summary

This clinical study is being conducted to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Bone Healing Accelerant (BHA) product when applied to tibia (leg bone) fractures with an external wound or skin break (also called open tibia fractures). It is hypothesized that by 6 months, the number of subjects with successful bone healing will be greater in the BHA-treated group compared to subjects treated with standard of care alone. Open tibia fractures were chosen for this study because healing rates are typically longer than for other bone fractures due to the limited vascular supply, limited soft tissue coverage, and higher risk of infection.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 29, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 1, 2019

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2019

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

January 23, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

January 29, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 21, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Composite healing measure

    Proportion of subjects in each arm meeting the healing success criteria. A binary (Yes/No) outcome for overall healing will be derived from the following three outcomes: Radiographic healing as measured by a score of at least 13 on the modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibia fractures (mRUST, range bad to good 1-16), ambulation as measured by a score of at least 2 on the Function IndeX for Trauma scale (range bad to good 0-3), and no secondary intervention to promote bone healing. All three components must be met for a "yes" on composite healing.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Radiographic healing

    6 months

  • Secondary intervention (surgical or nonsurgical)

    6 months

  • Surgical site infection

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

BHA

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects treated with BHA + standard of care

Combination Product: BHA

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Subjects treated as per standard of care

Interventions

BHACOMBINATION_PRODUCT

BHA active ingredients include a blood-derived component and beta-tricalcium phosphate. It is applied directly to the bone fracture and nearby viable bone at the time of wound closure.

BHA

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • In order to be eligible to participate in this study, subjects must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Patient is between the ages of 18-75 inclusive at time of randomization.
  • Patient has an acute open Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIA or IIIB fracture of the tibia shaft, with or without a fibula fracture, secondary to trauma.
  • Patient received antibiotic treatment within 2 hours of presentation at initial medical facility.
  • Patient underwent their first operative debridement within 24 hours of presentation at initial medical facility.
  • Patient is scheduled to have DWC within 14 days of initial injury.
  • The tibia fracture requires open fracture reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary (IM) nailing;
  • IM nailing has been cross-locked for stability with a 4-5mm interlock, with a minimum of 1 static screw above the fracture site and 1 static screw below the fracture site, and
  • All IM nails have a diameter between 8.5-12mm with 1.0-1.5mm over-reaming of the canal.
  • The temporary use of external fixation prior to IM rodding and DWC is allowed.
  • Upon stabilization of the tibia fracture, the patient has a cortical deficit of less than or equal to 1.0cm involving no more than 50% of the tibia circumference. The cortical deficit of the residual 50% circumference must be less than 1.0cm. Gap assessments to be made with calibrated radiographs or visual inspection. In addition, patients are not likely to require a secondary procedure(s) to promote bone healing.
  • BHA is able to be applied through existing soft tissue defects created by the injury or those created during surgical treatment. No new incisions should be required specifically for application of BHA.
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with all study procedures including all pre-operative, post-operative and rehabilitation requirements.
  • Patient is able to give voluntary IC to participate and has signed an IC form specific to this study prior to study treatment and DWC.
  • Patients of childbearing potential must use adequate methods of contraception during the duration of follow-up (12-months). Adequate methods include abstinence, female and male sterilization, hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUDs), implants, injectables, and double barrier methods.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are currently participating in another investigational trial or having participated in a clinical investigation within the last 90 days or intend to during the course of the study.
  • Patients who are currently prisoners.
  • Patients who are unable to give informed consent.
  • Patients who are skeletally immature (\<18 years of age or radiographic evidence of open tibial physes).
  • Patients with Type I, II, or IIIC open tibia fractures according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification.
  • Current injury is a pathological fracture.
  • Patients with additional injuries that could impact their ability to complete the required assessments and postoperative rehabilitation. Examples include but are not limited to the following:
  • Head injury with impaired cognitive function,
  • Spinal injury with resultant neurologic weakness or paralysis,
  • Multi-trauma requiring prolonged hospitalization or recovery that, in the opinion of the investigator, the treatment and/or rehabilitation of such injuries will substantially interfere with the treatment, rehabilitation or other requirements outlined in this protocol,
  • Concomitant ipsilateral or contralateral lower extremity injury/fracture(s) if, in the opinion of the investigator, the treatment and/or rehabilitation of such fracture(s) will substantially interfere with the treatment, rehabilitation or other requirements outlined in this protocol.
  • Sustained severe burns (\>10% total body surface area \[TBSA\] or \>5% TBSA with full thickness or circumferential injury)
  • Compartment syndrome of the leg diagnosed preoperatively
  • Patients with pre-existing conditions, mental/psychosocial disorders, or who are taking medication that may delay or impair the fracture healing process or that could impact their ability to return for follow-up visits and/or complete the required assessments and postoperative rehabilitation. Examples include but are not limited to the following:
  • Renal insufficiency with serum creatinine of 3.5 mg/dL or higher or being treated with renal dialysis,
  • +21 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Carmell Therapeutics

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15203, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tibial Fractures

Interventions

Butylated Hydroxyanisole

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesLeg Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnisolesMethyl EthersEthersOrganic ChemicalsPhenyl EthersPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbons

Study Officials

  • Janet M Vargo, PhD

    Carmell Therapeutics

    STUDY DIRECTOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2019

First Posted

February 1, 2019

Study Start

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion

January 1, 2022

Study Completion

February 1, 2022

Last Updated

January 23, 2020

Record last verified: 2019-07

Locations