Impact of Point-of-Care EID for HIV-Exposed Infants
POC-EID
Evaluation of the Impact of Point-of-Care Early Infant Diagnostic (EID) Testing on Timely Receipt of EID Results and Treatment Initiation in HIV-Exposed Children in Kenya and Zimbabwe
1 other identifier
interventional
9,539
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
This mixed methods study will utilize a randomized step-wedge design to assess the impact of point-of-care (POC) versus conventional early infant diagnosis (EID) on key outcomes including timely return of results to caregivers and time to initiation on treatment for HIV-infected infants. Data will be collected through longitudinal clinical follow-up and medical chart extraction of routine records and lab forms. Feasibility and acceptability data will be collected through interviews with mothers/caregivers of HIV-exposed infants, and community focus groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2019
CompletedFebruary 5, 2021
December 1, 2019
2.2 years
January 25, 2019
February 3, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of HIV exposed infants (HEI) who have received the 4-6 week EID test result by 12 weeks
The number of children for whom a sample was drawn for the 4-6-week indication receiving EID result by 12 weeks, divided by the number of HEI who presented to the clinic and had an indication for 4-6 week EID testing
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Testing coverage for the 4-6 week indication
18 months
Time from sample collection for 4-6 week EID test indication to parent's/ caregiver notification
18 months
Age of patient at test result notification for 4-6 week EID test indication
18 months
Time from test result received for 4-6 week EID test to initiation of ART, for HIV-infected infants
18 months
Percentage of HIV positive infants diagnosed during 4-6 week EID testing initiated on ART
18 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard of Care Early Infant Diagnosis
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional laboratory based (standard of care - SOC) early infant diagnosis (EID) testing: SOC EID
Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention is Point of Care (POC) early infant diagnosis (EID) testing, where the blood sample is processed at either the facility itself or a nearby site that is closer to the facility than a laboratory. With POC EID, blood samples do not have to travel to the laboratory for processing.
Interventions
HIV testing where the blood sample is processed at either the facility itself or a nearby site that is closer to the facility than a laboratory. With POC EID, blood samples do not have to travel to the laboratory for processing.
Conventional laboratory based EID testing
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any infant who receives an EID test, either conventional or POC, for the 4-6 week EID indication at one of the study sites (which were randomly selected from project sites in country)
- HEI under 12 weeks of age or their parents/caregivers
- Some methods will only include HEI who test positive (medical chart extraction and longitudinal follow up)
- Purposively selected caregivers of HEI for in-depth interviews
- Focus groups with community members will not require participants to have sought testing for EID
You may not qualify if:
- Participants not at selected study sites
- For some methods (medical chart extraction and longitudinal follow-up), HEI who test negative
- For qualitative component, excluded if unable to consent due to age, competence, or inability to speak any of the study languages
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundationlead
- UNITAIDcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
Nairobi, Kenya
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
Harare, Zimbabwe
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emma Sacks, PhD
George Washington University School of Public Health
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Collins Odhiambo, MD
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation - Kenya
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Agnes Mahomva, MD
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation - Zimbabwe
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jennifer Cohn, MD MPH
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2019
First Posted
January 31, 2019
Study Start
August 1, 2017
Primary Completion
October 30, 2019
Study Completion
October 31, 2019
Last Updated
February 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share