ROOM-LIGHT: Effect of a Dynamic Lighting System in Depressed Inpatients
Dynamic LED-light Versus Usual Care for Depressed Inpatient: A Randomised Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: despite developments a substantial part of patients with depression will only recover slowly. Light therapy from light boxes has shown antidepressant effects but have several limitations: time consuming, only allowing a fixed spectral distribution, only delivered at a specific time-point, and often with inadequate light intensity delivered at the retina. Therefore, we developed a new dynamic lighting system using light fixtures that are built into the room and can change intensity and spectral distribution of light during the 24-hour day. Objectives: the objective of this trial is to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of a newly developed dynamic lighting system using Light Emitting Diodes (LED) -light armatures aiming to mimic sunlight, when installed in the patient rooms of a psychiatric inpatient ward, compared with usual care. Design: the design is a randomised controlled trial with two arms: an active dynamic light trial arm and a usual care arm with blinding of depression outcome, and data analyses. Randomisation will be 1:1. Inclusion criteria: a current episode of a major depressive episode as part of a unipolar or bipolar disorder. Patients with bipolar depression should be in current and recent (minimum two months before admission) mood stabilising treatment, age \> 18 years, informed consent. Exclusion criteria: severe suicidality, abuse of alcohol and / or drugs, actual psychotic state, Young Mania Rating score above 7 or fulfilling diagnostic criteria for a current hypomanic or manic episode. Interventions: the experimental intervention is a dynamic LED-light system in 10 separate patient single rooms with three dynamic lamps: a window jamb built-in light panel, two ceiling mounted lamps, and a wall mounted lamp. The usual care is constant standard LED-light. Primary outcome: score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 6 item version (HAM-D6) scale at week 3 Secondary outcomes: score on the Suicidal Ideation Attribution Scale (SIDAS ) scale at week 3, and score in the Hamilton. Depression Rating Scale 17 item version (HAM-D17) scale at week 3, and score on the World Health Organisation Quality Of Life questionaire abbreviated version (WHOQOL-BREF) at week 3. Trial size: in total, 150 patients. Time schedule: the trial will be submitted for regulatory approvals January 2019, the first participant will be included April 2019, the expected last follow-up of the last participant will be December 2020, the expected last follow-up after 6 months will be June 2021, data will be analysed from June 2021 till September 2021, manuscripts will be prepared from December 2020, and we expect to submit first manuscript December 2021.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder
Started May 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2023
CompletedFebruary 25, 2026
February 1, 2026
3.8 years
January 21, 2019
February 24, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 6 item version
A scale, consisting of 7 items from the Hamilton depression Rating Scale, measuring severity of depression. Total scores from zero (no depression) to 24 (most severe depression)
Up to 3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Score on the SIDAS scale
Up to 3 weeks
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 item version
Up to 3 weeks
WHOQOL-BREF
Up to 3 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Dynamic light
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental intervention is the installation of a dynamic LED-light system in 10 separate patient single rooms. The system includes three elements: a window jamb built-in light panel, two ceiling mounted lamps, and a wall mounted lamp. All lamps will have a dynamic, time dependent frequency distribution and intensity of light.
Usual care
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe usual care is constant standard LED-light with two elements: two ceiling mounted lamps and a wall mounted lamp.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A current episode of a major depressive episode (DSM-5) as part of a unipolar or bipolar disorder.
- Patients with bipolar depression should be in current and recent (minimum two months before admission) mood stabilizing treatment
- Age \> 18 years
- Informed consent
- Danish speaking.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe suicidality
- Abuse of alcohol and / or drugs
- Actual psychotic state within last four weeks
- Actual Young Mania Rating score above 7 or fulfilling diagnostic criteria for a current hypomanic or manic episode
- Patient is subject to coercive measures of any kind.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberglead
- Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitalcollaborator
- Grosserer L. F. Foghts Fond Denmarkcollaborator
- ELFORSK Danish Energycollaborator
- Technical University of Denmarkcollaborator
- Toyota-Fondencollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Psychiatic Hospital Copenhagen
Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100, Denmark
Related Publications (2)
Perera S, Eisen R, Bhatt M, Bhatnagar N, de Souza R, Thabane L, Samaan Z. Light therapy for non-seasonal depression: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJPsych Open. 2016 Mar 4;2(2):116-126. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.001610. eCollection 2016 Mar.
PMID: 27703764RESULTVolf C, Aggestrup AS, Petersen PM, Dam-Hansen C, Knorr U, Petersen EE, Engstrom J, Jakobsen JC, Hansen TS, Madsen HO, Hageman I, Martiny K. Dynamic LED-light versus static LED-light for depressed inpatients: study protocol for a randomised clinical study. BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 26;10(1):e032233. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032233.
PMID: 31988225DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Klaus Martiny, DMSc
Psychiatic Hospital Copenhagen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding of depression severity assessment
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Clinical Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2019
First Posted
January 29, 2019
Study Start
May 15, 2019
Primary Completion
March 15, 2023
Study Completion
March 15, 2023
Last Updated
February 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
We will make data from this study available on reasonable request once the results are published