Evaluation of Gingival Health Parameters in Hybrid CAD / CAM Crowns Produced After Different Retraction Processes
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Clinically, the gingival retraction dentistry itself has found wide uses. It has achieved the use of subgingival and gingival crowns in fixed prostheses, cervical abrasion in restorative dentistry, management of root caries and root sensitivity, and recently in the use of appropriate measurements to improve the marginal fit of implant prostheses.There are three different retraction procedures described in the literature: mechanical, mechanical-chemical (chemically impregnated cords or matrix in injectable form) and surgery (electrosurgical, laser, cauterization, etc.)The mechanical method of retraction cords is not always suitable for patients' existing pocket depth, the necessity of using different combinations in shallow or deep pockets, the potential for limited bleeding control in chemically impregnated cords and the toxicity values in those who interact with chemical have led researchers to search for alternative methods. Especially inflammed gingiva is very sensitive to mechanical and chemical trauma. Studies have reported that gingival inflammation, pain, pocket formation, gingival withdrawal, increased bleeding and wound contamination occurred following retraction cord application. However, it is a known fact that the impression material is distorted or the accuracy of the measurement is decreased with the measurements taken without retraction. Nowadays, CAD / CAM (computer-aided design / computer-aided manufacturing) devices, which are designed to overcome these problems and eliminate the errors related to the measurement material, are the first step to be taken with a clear measure.Gingival retraction is recommended to improve the success of scanners in all restorations performed at the gingival or subgingival endpoint. Therefore, in our study, crown restorations will be produced from hybrid blocks by means of CAD / CAM device in order to evaluate the interaction of gingival health with hybrid blocks and to provide the latest technology and standardization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 17, 2020
CompletedApril 22, 2021
April 1, 2021
1 year
January 17, 2019
April 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Retraction methods or procedures effects on gingival health
Probing depth is one of the criteria that shows the gingival health. In each control sessions same researcher measure the probing depth as mm via a periodontal probe.
3-12 months
Study Arms (3)
Mechanical cord usage
ACTIVE COMPARATORMechanical retraction
Chemical contained retraction usage
ACTIVE COMPARATORChemical retraction
MZ-6 laser tip used throughing
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaser retraction
Interventions
Due to the retraction procedures, same preparation conditions will be obtained.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being systemically healthy
- To indicate crown restoration in mandibular molar teeth
- To be vital to the preparation of the crown of the teeth
You may not qualify if:
- Systemically unhealthy individuals
- Endodontic treatment of mandibular molar teeth
- Mandibular molar female individuals drawn for various reasons
- Pregnant women
- Periodontally unhealthy individuals
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beyza Ünalan Değirmenci
Van, 65080, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Padbury A Jr, Eber R, Wang HL. Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 May;30(5):379-85. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.01277.x.
PMID: 12716328RESULTAl-Ani A, Bennani V, Chandler NP, Lyons KM, Thomson WM. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants. N Z Dent J. 2010 Sep;106(3):92-6.
PMID: 20882737RESULTGoldberg PV, Higginbottom FL, Wilson TG. Periodontal considerations in restorative and implant therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2001;25:100-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.22250108.x.
PMID: 11155185RESULTKopac I, Cvetko E, Marion L. Gingival inflammatory response induced by chemical retraction agents in beagle dogs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Jan-Feb;15(1):14-9.
PMID: 11887594RESULTPolat NT, Ozdemir AK, Turgut M. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow. Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Jan-Feb;20(1):57-62.
PMID: 17319365RESULTFerrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Ercoli C. Tissue management with a new gingival retraction material: a preliminary clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Mar;75(3):242-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90479-5.
PMID: 8648569RESULTde Gennaro GG, Landesman HM, Calhoun JE, Martinoff JT. A comparison of gingival inflammation related to retraction cords. J Prosthet Dent. 1982 Apr;47(4):384-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(82)80085-1.
PMID: 6951037RESULTAhmed SN, Donovan TE. Gingival displacement: Survey results of dentists' practice procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jul;114(1):81-5.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.015. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
PMID: 25917854RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2019
First Posted
January 25, 2019
Study Start
January 17, 2019
Primary Completion
January 17, 2020
Study Completion
April 17, 2020
Last Updated
April 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04