Volumetric Laser Endomicroscopy With Intelligent Real-time Image Segmentation (IRIS)
1 other identifier
interventional
148
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This is a prospective randomized clinical trial examining how IRIS (Intelligent Real-time Image Segmentation) affects biopsy patterns in VLE (Volumetric laser endomicroscopy).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 24, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 7, 2022
CompletedOctober 7, 2022
September 1, 2022
1.4 years
January 8, 2019
February 9, 2022
September 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Time for Image Interpretation (Mean)
The length of time required to fully assess and interpret the results of a VLE scan. Time will be a surrogate for ease of interpretation. Time will be recorded from start of image interpretation to the end of image interpretation. Length of the Barrett's segment will be taken into account (time per cm of Barrett's) when comparing this outcome between patients and procedures.
Index procedure, up to 1 hour
Time for Image Interpretation (Mean - Scaled)
The length of time required to fully assess and interpret the results of a VLE scan. Time will be a surrogate for ease of interpretation. Time will be recorded from start of image interpretation to the end of image interpretation. Length of the Barrett's segment will be taken into account (time per cm of Barrett's) when comparing this outcome between patients and procedures.
Index procedure, up to 1 hour
Time for Image Interpretation (Median - Scaled)
The length of time required to fully assess and interpret the results of a VLE scan. Time will be a surrogate for ease of interpretation. Time will be recorded from start of image interpretation to the end of image interpretation. Length of Barrett's will be taken into account (time per cm of Barrett's) when comparing this outcome between patients and procedures.
Index procedure, up to 1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Subjects With Dysplasia on Biopsies
Index procedure
Study Arms (2)
VLE without IRIS, followed by VLE with IRIS
ACTIVE COMPARATORVLE (Volumetric laser endomicroscopy) performed alone, followed by IRIS (Intelligent real-time image segmentation) imaging.
VLE with IRIS, followed by VLE without IRIS
ACTIVE COMPARATORVLE (Volumetric laser endomicroscopy) performed with IRIS (Intelligent real-time image segmentation) imaging, followed by VLE alone.
Interventions
IRIS has the ability to identify and display three specific images features that may correlate with dysplasia that are represented in different color schemes.
VLE uses infrared light to produce real time high-resolution cross sectional imaging of the esophagus.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older at the time of informed consent
- Barrett's esophagus greater than 2 cm in length
- Undergoing a scheduled upper endoscopy with VLE exam for surveillance as standard of care
You may not qualify if:
- Less than 18 years old at the time of informed consent
- Unable to provide written informed consent
- Esophageal stenosis/stricture preventing VLE
- Esophagitis
- Severe medical comorbidities preventing endoscopy
- Pregnancy
- Uncontrolled coagulopathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwell Healthlead
- NinePoint Medicalcollaborator
- Mayo Cliniccollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Mayo Clinic
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States
Related Publications (27)
Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, Gerson LB; American College of Gastroenterology. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;111(1):30-50; quiz 51. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.322. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
PMID: 26526079BACKGROUNDSpechler SJ, Souza RF. Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):836-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1314704. No abstract available.
PMID: 25162890BACKGROUNDPohl H, Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jan 19;97(2):142-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji024.
PMID: 15657344BACKGROUNDBhat SK, McManus DT, Coleman HG, Johnston BT, Cardwell CR, McMenamin U, Bannon F, Hicks B, Kennedy G, Gavin AT, Murray LJ. Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and prior diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus: a population-based study. Gut. 2015 Jan;64(1):20-5. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305506. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
PMID: 24700439BACKGROUNDCorley DA, Mehtani K, Quesenberry C, Zhao W, de Boer J, Weiss NS. Impact of endoscopic surveillance on mortality from Barrett's esophagus-associated esophageal adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 2013 Aug;145(2):312-9.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 May 11.
PMID: 23673354BACKGROUNDLevine DS, Haggitt RC, Blount PL, Rabinovitch PS, Rusch VW, Reid BJ. An endoscopic biopsy protocol can differentiate high-grade dysplasia from early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1993 Jul;105(1):40-50. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90008-z.
PMID: 8514061BACKGROUNDJankowski M, Wani S. Diagnostic and Management Implications of Basic Science Advances in Barrett's Esophagus. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;13(1):16-29. doi: 10.1007/s11938-014-0040-9.
PMID: 25567106BACKGROUNDTrindade AJ, Smith MS, Pleskow DK. The new kid on the block for advanced imaging in Barrett's esophagus: a review of volumetric laser endomicroscopy. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 May;9(3):408-16. doi: 10.1177/1756283X16639003. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
PMID: 27134668BACKGROUNDWolfsen HC, Sharma P, Wallace MB, Leggett C, Tearney G, Wang KK. Safety and feasibility of volumetric laser endomicroscopy in patients with Barrett's esophagus (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Oct;82(4):631-40. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1968. Epub 2015 May 6.
PMID: 25956472BACKGROUNDTrindade AJ, Leggett CL, Chang KJ. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy in the management of Barrett's esophagus. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;33(4):254-260. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000366.
PMID: 28402993BACKGROUNDSwager AF, de Groof AJ, Meijer SL, Weusten BL, Curvers WL, Bergman JJ. Feasibility of laser marking in Barrett's esophagus with volumetric laser endomicroscopy: first-in-man pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Sep;86(3):464-472. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
PMID: 28161451BACKGROUNDSwager AF, Tearney GJ, Leggett CL, van Oijen MGH, Meijer SL, Weusten BL, Curvers WL, Bergman JJGHM. Identification of volumetric laser endomicroscopy features predictive for early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus using high-quality histological correlation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):918-926.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
PMID: 27658906BACKGROUNDLeggett CL, Gorospe EC, Chan DK, Muppa P, Owens V, Smyrk TC, Anderson M, Lutzke LS, Tearney G, Wang KK. Comparative diagnostic performance of volumetric laser endomicroscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy in the detection of dysplasia associated with Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):880-888.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.050. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
PMID: 26344884BACKGROUNDTrindade AJ, Vamadevan AS, Sejpal DV. Finding a needle in a haystack: use of volumetric laser endomicroscopy in targeting focal dysplasia in long-segment Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Oct;82(4):756; discussion 757. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1984. Epub 2015 May 21. No abstract available.
PMID: 26005011BACKGROUNDTrindade AJ, George BJ, Berkowitz J, Sejpal DV, McKinley MJ. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy can target neoplasia not detected by conventional endoscopic measures in long segment Barrett's esophagus. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Mar;4(3):E318-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-101409.
PMID: 27004250BACKGROUNDLeggett CL, Gorospe E, Owens VL, Anderson M, Lutzke L, Wang KK. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy detects subsquamous Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;109(2):298-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.422. No abstract available.
PMID: 24496431BACKGROUNDSwager AF, Boerwinkel DF, de Bruin DM, Faber DJ, van Leeuwen TG, Weusten BL, Meijer SL, Bergman JJ, Curvers WL. Detection of buried Barrett's glands after radiofrequency ablation with volumetric laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
PMID: 26124075BACKGROUNDTrindade AJ, Sideridis K, Thomas RM. Buried Barrett's Esophagus Presenting as a Subepithelial Nodule. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;111(10):1378. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.242. No abstract available.
PMID: 27694877BACKGROUNDMashimo H. Subsquamous intestinal metaplasia after ablation of Barrett's esophagus: frequency and importance. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;29(4):454-9. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283622796.
PMID: 23674187BACKGROUNDAtkinson C, Singh S, Fisichella PM. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy in the detection of neoplastic lesions of the esophagus. Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Jun;48(6):692. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Mar 2. No abstract available.
PMID: 26976783BACKGROUNDAlshelleh M, Inamdar S, McKinley M, Stewart M, Novak JS, Greenberg RE, Sultan K, Devito B, Cheung M, Cerulli MA, Miller LS, Sejpal DV, Vegesna AK, Trindade AJ. Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.032. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
PMID: 29410080BACKGROUNDTrindade AJ, Inamdar S, Smith MS, Chang KJ, Leggett CL, Lightdale CJ, Pleskow DK, Sejpal DV, Tearney GJ, Thomas RM, Wallace MB. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy in Barrett's esophagus: interobserver agreement for interpretation of Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplasia among high-frequency users. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.026. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
PMID: 27899321BACKGROUNDTrindade AJ, Inamdar S, Smith MS, Rosen L, Han D, Chang KJ, Leggett CL, Lightdale CJ, Pleskow DK, Sejpal DV, Tearney GJ, Thomas RM, Wallace MB. Learning curve and competence for volumetric laser endomicroscopy in Barrett's esophagus using cumulative sum analysis. Endoscopy. 2018 May;50(5):471-478. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121569. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
PMID: 29179229BACKGROUNDEvans JA, Poneros JM, Bouma BE, Bressner J, Halpern EF, Shishkov M, Lauwers GY, Mino-Kenudson M, Nishioka NS, Tearney GJ. Optical coherence tomography to identify intramucosal carcinoma and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Jan;4(1):38-43. doi: 10.1053/S1542-3565(05)00746-9.
PMID: 16431303BACKGROUNDSwager AF, van der Sommen F, Klomp SR, Zinger S, Meijer SL, Schoon EJ, Bergman JJGHM, de With PH, Curvers WL. Computer-aided detection of early Barrett's neoplasia using volumetric laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Nov;86(5):839-846. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
PMID: 28322771BACKGROUNDAlvarez Herrero L, Curvers WL, van Vilsteren FG, Wolfsen H, Ragunath K, Wong Kee Song LM, Mallant-Hent RC, van Oijen A, Scholten P, Schoon EJ, Schenk EB, Weusten BL, Bergman JG. Validation of the Prague C&M classification of Barrett's esophagus in clinical practice. Endoscopy. 2013 Nov;45(11):876-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344952. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
PMID: 24165812BACKGROUNDThe Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6 Suppl):S3-43. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02159-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 14652541BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
By utilizing expert users, we're unable to assess the impact of IRIS on novice interpretation. We also utilized a surveillance biopsy protocol that avoided areas of laser marking to avoid confounding and were thus unable to compare VLE-related dysplasia detection to that which would have occurred in the standardized biopsy protocol. Finally, although we did randomize the order of interpretation, it is not possible to eliminate all bias from a subjective interpretation paradigm.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Arvind Trindade
- Organization
- Northwell Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arvind Trindade, MD
Northwell Health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2019
First Posted
January 24, 2019
Study Start
January 23, 2019
Primary Completion
May 31, 2020
Study Completion
February 28, 2021
Last Updated
October 7, 2022
Results First Posted
October 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share