NCT03814824

Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomized clinical trial examining how IRIS (Intelligent Real-time Image Segmentation) affects biopsy patterns in VLE (Volumetric laser endomicroscopy).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
148

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 8, 2019

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 23, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 24, 2019

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2020

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2021

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 7, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 7, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

January 8, 2019

Results QC Date

February 9, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 12, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

VLEVolumetric laser endomicroscopyIRISIntelligent real-time image segmentationBarrett's Esophagus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Time for Image Interpretation (Mean)

    The length of time required to fully assess and interpret the results of a VLE scan. Time will be a surrogate for ease of interpretation. Time will be recorded from start of image interpretation to the end of image interpretation. Length of the Barrett's segment will be taken into account (time per cm of Barrett's) when comparing this outcome between patients and procedures.

    Index procedure, up to 1 hour

  • Time for Image Interpretation (Mean - Scaled)

    The length of time required to fully assess and interpret the results of a VLE scan. Time will be a surrogate for ease of interpretation. Time will be recorded from start of image interpretation to the end of image interpretation. Length of the Barrett's segment will be taken into account (time per cm of Barrett's) when comparing this outcome between patients and procedures.

    Index procedure, up to 1 hour

  • Time for Image Interpretation (Median - Scaled)

    The length of time required to fully assess and interpret the results of a VLE scan. Time will be a surrogate for ease of interpretation. Time will be recorded from start of image interpretation to the end of image interpretation. Length of Barrett's will be taken into account (time per cm of Barrett's) when comparing this outcome between patients and procedures.

    Index procedure, up to 1 hour

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Subjects With Dysplasia on Biopsies

    Index procedure

Study Arms (2)

VLE without IRIS, followed by VLE with IRIS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

VLE (Volumetric laser endomicroscopy) performed alone, followed by IRIS (Intelligent real-time image segmentation) imaging.

Diagnostic Test: IRIS (Intelligent real-time image segmentation)Diagnostic Test: VLE (Volumetric laser endomicroscopy)

VLE with IRIS, followed by VLE without IRIS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

VLE (Volumetric laser endomicroscopy) performed with IRIS (Intelligent real-time image segmentation) imaging, followed by VLE alone.

Diagnostic Test: IRIS (Intelligent real-time image segmentation)Diagnostic Test: VLE (Volumetric laser endomicroscopy)

Interventions

IRIS has the ability to identify and display three specific images features that may correlate with dysplasia that are represented in different color schemes.

VLE with IRIS, followed by VLE without IRISVLE without IRIS, followed by VLE with IRIS

VLE uses infrared light to produce real time high-resolution cross sectional imaging of the esophagus.

VLE with IRIS, followed by VLE without IRISVLE without IRIS, followed by VLE with IRIS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age or older at the time of informed consent
  • Barrett's esophagus greater than 2 cm in length
  • Undergoing a scheduled upper endoscopy with VLE exam for surveillance as standard of care

You may not qualify if:

  • Less than 18 years old at the time of informed consent
  • Unable to provide written informed consent
  • Esophageal stenosis/stricture preventing VLE
  • Esophagitis
  • Severe medical comorbidities preventing endoscopy
  • Pregnancy
  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Mayo Clinic

Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

North Shore University Hospital

Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States

Location

Related Publications (27)

  • Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, Gerson LB; American College of Gastroenterology. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;111(1):30-50; quiz 51. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.322. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

    PMID: 26526079BACKGROUND
  • Spechler SJ, Souza RF. Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):836-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1314704. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25162890BACKGROUND
  • Pohl H, Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jan 19;97(2):142-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji024.

    PMID: 15657344BACKGROUND
  • Bhat SK, McManus DT, Coleman HG, Johnston BT, Cardwell CR, McMenamin U, Bannon F, Hicks B, Kennedy G, Gavin AT, Murray LJ. Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and prior diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus: a population-based study. Gut. 2015 Jan;64(1):20-5. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305506. Epub 2014 Apr 3.

    PMID: 24700439BACKGROUND
  • Corley DA, Mehtani K, Quesenberry C, Zhao W, de Boer J, Weiss NS. Impact of endoscopic surveillance on mortality from Barrett's esophagus-associated esophageal adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 2013 Aug;145(2):312-9.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 May 11.

    PMID: 23673354BACKGROUND
  • Levine DS, Haggitt RC, Blount PL, Rabinovitch PS, Rusch VW, Reid BJ. An endoscopic biopsy protocol can differentiate high-grade dysplasia from early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1993 Jul;105(1):40-50. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90008-z.

    PMID: 8514061BACKGROUND
  • Jankowski M, Wani S. Diagnostic and Management Implications of Basic Science Advances in Barrett's Esophagus. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;13(1):16-29. doi: 10.1007/s11938-014-0040-9.

    PMID: 25567106BACKGROUND
  • Trindade AJ, Smith MS, Pleskow DK. The new kid on the block for advanced imaging in Barrett's esophagus: a review of volumetric laser endomicroscopy. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 May;9(3):408-16. doi: 10.1177/1756283X16639003. Epub 2016 Mar 21.

    PMID: 27134668BACKGROUND
  • Wolfsen HC, Sharma P, Wallace MB, Leggett C, Tearney G, Wang KK. Safety and feasibility of volumetric laser endomicroscopy in patients with Barrett's esophagus (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Oct;82(4):631-40. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1968. Epub 2015 May 6.

    PMID: 25956472BACKGROUND
  • Trindade AJ, Leggett CL, Chang KJ. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy in the management of Barrett's esophagus. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;33(4):254-260. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000366.

    PMID: 28402993BACKGROUND
  • Swager AF, de Groof AJ, Meijer SL, Weusten BL, Curvers WL, Bergman JJ. Feasibility of laser marking in Barrett's esophagus with volumetric laser endomicroscopy: first-in-man pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Sep;86(3):464-472. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

    PMID: 28161451BACKGROUND
  • Swager AF, Tearney GJ, Leggett CL, van Oijen MGH, Meijer SL, Weusten BL, Curvers WL, Bergman JJGHM. Identification of volumetric laser endomicroscopy features predictive for early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus using high-quality histological correlation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):918-926.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Sep 19.

    PMID: 27658906BACKGROUND
  • Leggett CL, Gorospe EC, Chan DK, Muppa P, Owens V, Smyrk TC, Anderson M, Lutzke LS, Tearney G, Wang KK. Comparative diagnostic performance of volumetric laser endomicroscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy in the detection of dysplasia associated with Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):880-888.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.050. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

    PMID: 26344884BACKGROUND
  • Trindade AJ, Vamadevan AS, Sejpal DV. Finding a needle in a haystack: use of volumetric laser endomicroscopy in targeting focal dysplasia in long-segment Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Oct;82(4):756; discussion 757. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1984. Epub 2015 May 21. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26005011BACKGROUND
  • Trindade AJ, George BJ, Berkowitz J, Sejpal DV, McKinley MJ. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy can target neoplasia not detected by conventional endoscopic measures in long segment Barrett's esophagus. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Mar;4(3):E318-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-101409.

    PMID: 27004250BACKGROUND
  • Leggett CL, Gorospe E, Owens VL, Anderson M, Lutzke L, Wang KK. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy detects subsquamous Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;109(2):298-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.422. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24496431BACKGROUND
  • Swager AF, Boerwinkel DF, de Bruin DM, Faber DJ, van Leeuwen TG, Weusten BL, Meijer SL, Bergman JJ, Curvers WL. Detection of buried Barrett's glands after radiofrequency ablation with volumetric laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

    PMID: 26124075BACKGROUND
  • Trindade AJ, Sideridis K, Thomas RM. Buried Barrett's Esophagus Presenting as a Subepithelial Nodule. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;111(10):1378. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.242. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27694877BACKGROUND
  • Mashimo H. Subsquamous intestinal metaplasia after ablation of Barrett's esophagus: frequency and importance. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;29(4):454-9. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283622796.

    PMID: 23674187BACKGROUND
  • Atkinson C, Singh S, Fisichella PM. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy in the detection of neoplastic lesions of the esophagus. Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Jun;48(6):692. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Mar 2. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26976783BACKGROUND
  • Alshelleh M, Inamdar S, McKinley M, Stewart M, Novak JS, Greenberg RE, Sultan K, Devito B, Cheung M, Cerulli MA, Miller LS, Sejpal DV, Vegesna AK, Trindade AJ. Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.032. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

    PMID: 29410080BACKGROUND
  • Trindade AJ, Inamdar S, Smith MS, Chang KJ, Leggett CL, Lightdale CJ, Pleskow DK, Sejpal DV, Tearney GJ, Thomas RM, Wallace MB. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy in Barrett's esophagus: interobserver agreement for interpretation of Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplasia among high-frequency users. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.026. Epub 2016 Nov 27.

    PMID: 27899321BACKGROUND
  • Trindade AJ, Inamdar S, Smith MS, Rosen L, Han D, Chang KJ, Leggett CL, Lightdale CJ, Pleskow DK, Sejpal DV, Tearney GJ, Thomas RM, Wallace MB. Learning curve and competence for volumetric laser endomicroscopy in Barrett's esophagus using cumulative sum analysis. Endoscopy. 2018 May;50(5):471-478. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121569. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

    PMID: 29179229BACKGROUND
  • Evans JA, Poneros JM, Bouma BE, Bressner J, Halpern EF, Shishkov M, Lauwers GY, Mino-Kenudson M, Nishioka NS, Tearney GJ. Optical coherence tomography to identify intramucosal carcinoma and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Jan;4(1):38-43. doi: 10.1053/S1542-3565(05)00746-9.

    PMID: 16431303BACKGROUND
  • Swager AF, van der Sommen F, Klomp SR, Zinger S, Meijer SL, Schoon EJ, Bergman JJGHM, de With PH, Curvers WL. Computer-aided detection of early Barrett's neoplasia using volumetric laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Nov;86(5):839-846. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

    PMID: 28322771BACKGROUND
  • Alvarez Herrero L, Curvers WL, van Vilsteren FG, Wolfsen H, Ragunath K, Wong Kee Song LM, Mallant-Hent RC, van Oijen A, Scholten P, Schoon EJ, Schenk EB, Weusten BL, Bergman JG. Validation of the Prague C&M classification of Barrett's esophagus in clinical practice. Endoscopy. 2013 Nov;45(11):876-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344952. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

    PMID: 24165812BACKGROUND
  • The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6 Suppl):S3-43. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02159-x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14652541BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Barrett Esophagus

Interventions

Genes, BRCA1

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Precancerous ConditionsNeoplasmsEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genes, Tumor SuppressorGenes, NeoplasmGenesGenome ComponentsGenomeGenetic StructuresGenetic PhenomenaGenes, Recessive

Limitations and Caveats

By utilizing expert users, we're unable to assess the impact of IRIS on novice interpretation. We also utilized a surveillance biopsy protocol that avoided areas of laser marking to avoid confounding and were thus unable to compare VLE-related dysplasia detection to that which would have occurred in the standardized biopsy protocol. Finally, although we did randomize the order of interpretation, it is not possible to eliminate all bias from a subjective interpretation paradigm.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Arvind Trindade
Organization
Northwell Health

Study Officials

  • Arvind Trindade, MD

    Northwell Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2019

First Posted

January 24, 2019

Study Start

January 23, 2019

Primary Completion

May 31, 2020

Study Completion

February 28, 2021

Last Updated

October 7, 2022

Results First Posted

October 7, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations