Comparative Effectiveness of Family vs. Individually Focused Diabetes Education and Support
Comparative Effectiveness of Adding Family Supporter Training to a CHW-Led Intervention to Improve Behavioral Management of Multiple Risk Factors for Diabetes Complications
2 other identifiers
interventional
444
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a novel program-Family Support for Health Action (FAM-ACT) - to individual patient-focused diabetes self-management education and support (I-DSMES).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
Started Sep 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 13, 2025
CompletedFebruary 13, 2025
February 1, 2025
4.3 years
January 18, 2019
December 19, 2024
February 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Patient Glycemic Control at 6 Months
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, percent) was measured via finger stick performed by a study research assistant, by a clinician as a part of the patients' regular care, or by patients via home test kit. For analysis, HbA1c first was examined graphically to understand how it changed over time. Main analyses then were conducted using linear mixed-effects models, with 12-month HbA1c values included in the models to increase the power to estimate changes over the initial 6 months. Adjusted outcome and effect estimates at 6 months were derived from linear mixed models using linear contrasts. The model was fitted using all available time points (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) from all 222 enrollees to make efficient use of the data. Including all time points allows the model to account for individual trajectories over time, thus increasing power to detect treatment effects and reducing bias that could arise from analyzing the 6-month time point in isolation.
Baseline vs. 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Change From Baseline in Patient Glycemic Control at 12 Months
Baseline vs. 12 months
Change From Baseline in Patient Systolic Blood Pressure at 6 Months
Baseline vs. 6 months
Change From Baseline in Patient Systolic Blood Pressure at 12 Months
Baseline vs. 12 months
Change From Baseline in Patient Diabetes Distress at 6 Months
Baseline vs. 6 months
Change From Baseline in Patient Diabetes Distress at 12 Months
Baseline vs. 12 months
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (9)
Change in Diabetes Self-care Behaviors in Patient: Healthy Eating
Baseline vs. 12 months
Change in Diabetes Self-care Behaviors in Patient: Physical Activity
Baseline vs. 12 months
Change in Diabetes Self-care Behaviors in Patient: Medication Adherence
Baseline vs. 12 months
- +6 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
FAM-ACT
EXPERIMENTALPatient and Support Person (dyad) will be included together as much as possible. The dyad will: 1. Take part in a one-hour introductory session and review of the patient's Diabetes Complications Risk Assessment profile. 2. Be invited to 4-6 Support Person-focused, group diabetes self-management education (DSME) sessions lasting 1-2 ½ hours each. 3. Receive case management contacts with a Community Health Worker (CHW) once every 2-4 weeks, subject to participant availability. Successful contacts will last approximately 20 minutes.
I-DSMES
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm will focus on the patient only. The Support Person assigned to this arm will not be invited to the introduction sessions, care management contacts, or diabetes self-management education sessions. Patients assigned to this arm will: 1. Take part in a one-hour introductory session and review of patient's diabetes management risk assessment. 2. Be invited to 4-6 group diabetes self-management education (DSME) sessions lasting 45 min to 2 hours each. 3. Receive case management contacts with a Community Health Worker (CHW) once every 2-4 weeks, subject to participant availability. Successful contacts will last approximately 20 minutes.
Interventions
Patient and Support Person (dyad) will receive a Diabetes Complications Risk Assessment profile and introduction session, Support Person-focused information/skills training through 4-6 extended DSME sessions, case management contacts with CHW throughout the duration of the 6-month intervention, and guidance on how to prepare for and participate in healthcare appointments.
Patient only will receive a Diabetes Complications Risk Assessment profile and introduction session, 4-6 group DSME sessions, case management contacts with CHW throughout the duration of the 6-month intervention, and guidance on how to prepare for and participate in healthcare appointments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes
- Most recent HbA1c done in the 3 months prior to screening phone call \>= 7.5%
- Plan to use recruiting site for health care over the next 12 months after enrollment
- Must be able to identify a family member or friend who is willing to be involved in their health care
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis (active or prior) of Alzheimer's disease or dementia
- Preferred language is not English or Spanish
- Diagnosis (active or prior) of schizophrenia or other psychotic/delusional disorder in CHASS EMR Problem list as of screening call date
- Diagnosis of gestational diabetes without any other diabetes diagnoses
- Diagnosed with diabetes at age \< 21 years
- Pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months
- Concerns that may make it difficult to participate (ongoing health issues, personal events, etc.)
- Have a life-limiting severe illness (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring oxygen)
- Able to attend intervention sessions in person or remotely via online video-conferencing
- At least 21 years old
- Does not speak English or Spanish
- Receives pay for caring for the patient
- Has self-reported serious mental illness (schizophrenia)
- Has a life-limiting severe illness (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring oxygen)
- Has significant cognitive impairment (Alzheimer's disease or dementia)
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Community Health and Social Services Center (CHASS)
Detroit, Michigan, 48209, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Related Publications (2)
Deverts DJ, Heisler M, Kieffer EC, Piatt GA, Valbuena F, Yabes JG, Guajardo C, Ilarraza-Montalvo D, Palmisano G, Koerbel G, Rosland AM. Comparing the effectiveness of Family Support for Health Action (FAM-ACT) with traditional community health worker-led interventions to improve adult diabetes management and outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Oct 3;23(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06764-1.
PMID: 36192769BACKGROUNDZupa MF, Perez S, Palmisano G, Kieffer EC, Piatt GA, Valbuena FM, Deverts DJ, Yabes JG, Heisler M, Rosland AM. Changes in Self-management During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes at a Federally Qualified Health Center. J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Oct;24(5):1375-1378. doi: 10.1007/s10903-022-01351-7. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
PMID: 35301642BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Many patients were due for the 6-month A1c measure (main outcome) during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic when restrictions on face-to-face research activities prevented us from collecting the data and they missed this outcome window. Two compensatory strategies were enacted: (a) review patients' EHR to identify additional A1c data during the collection window and (b) send patients home A1c test kits. This did yield some additional data, but we still missed 6-month A1c data for many patients.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ann-Marie Rosland, MD, MS
- Organization
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ann-Marie Rosland, MD,MS
University of Pittsburgh
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcomes Assessor will be unaware of the arm assignment of the participant when assessing main outcomes.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2019
First Posted
January 23, 2019
Study Start
September 23, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
February 13, 2025
Results First Posted
February 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- The data will become available beginning 6 months and ending 36 months after the primary trial results are published.
- Access Criteria
- All access will be thru the Center for Clinical Trials \& Data Coordination (CCDC) at the University of Pittsburgh. Access will be monitored and controlled by our data center. No access will be granted until the initial requesting investigator vetting process is completed and a signed DUA is on file. All data safety plans and monitoring are listed on the CCDC website. Researchers interested in the data must sign a data use agreement (DUA) with the University of Pittsburgh, which must also be reviewed and agreed to by study partner CHASS Center Inc. No other data sharing options will be considered. The data that may be shared includes: de-identified participant data, tables, figures, appendices, analysis plan, and protocol.
The study investigators will make de-identified data sets available for sharing after the trial is finished and primary analyses have been completed and published. Researchers requesting data must present an IRB-approved methodological protocol and explain the relevance of their interest in the study completed data to public health goals. Authors completing secondary analyses of the shared study data must agree to the Center for Clinical Trials and Data Coordination (CCDC) policy on data sharing and publishing. All secondary analysis authors will be expected to credit the primary investigators and mention the data source in all publications. Secondary authors will acknowledge that the data use was in accordance with CCDC protocol and the signed Data Use Agreement (DUA). The University of Pittsburgh Principal Investigator and study coordinator will not release any data until all request criteria are met and a signed Data Use Agreement is filed.