NCT03812237

Brief Summary

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Early Weight Bearing versus Non Weight Bearing Following Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
131

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 20, 2012

Completed
5.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 31, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

5.4 years

First QC Date

January 18, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 29, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Lapidus ArthrodesisEarly Weight BearingFirst Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • TMT Fusion Rate

    To compare the incidence and rate of first TMT fusion using two different postoperative protocols until fusion consolidation.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • American Foot & Ankle Society Midfoot Scores (AOFAS)

    12 months

  • Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA)

    12 months

  • Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    12 months

  • Foot Function Index Revised (FFIr)

    12 months

  • Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) v.2

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

(EWB) Early Weight Bearing (2 Weeks Post-op)

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects in the EWB group were allowed to begin bearing 50 pounds (lbs) through their hindfoot in either the boot or the short leg cast at the two-week visit. They were allowed to advance their weightbearing as tolerated by 25 lbs every four days until full weightbearing through the hindfoot was achieved.

Other: (EWB) Early Weight Bearing (2 Weeks Post-op)

(SOC) Standard of Care Weight Bearing (6-8 Weeks Post-op)

NO INTERVENTION

Subjects in the SOC group were allowed to heel touch weightbear for balance only on the operative foot until the six to eight week visit. At this visit all subjects were placed into a short leg walking boot. Non-weightbearing patients were permitted to begin the progressive weightbearing protocol, without hindfoot restriction.

Interventions

Patient were permitted to progressively weightbear on their heel at 2 week post-op.

Also known as: EWB
(EWB) Early Weight Bearing (2 Weeks Post-op)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient has signed the Institutional Review Board approved informed consent form specific to this study prior to enrollment
  • Failure of conservative treatment (i.e. non-surgical action, consisting of footwear modification in the form of shoes with wide toe boxes, padded inserts, activity modifications and pain control medications)
  • Patients who underwent Lapidus procedure with or without other procedures of the first ray (i.e., muscle-tendon procedures, distal metatarsal osteotomy, Akin procedure)
  • Patient older than 18 years of age
  • Patient is able to give informed consent
  • Patient is independent, ambulatory, and agrees to comply with all postoperative visits

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient has a pre-existing condition which may cause impairment of healing and bone fusion
  • Any significant pathology that, in the opinion of investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for study
  • Patients who underwent Lapidus arthrodesis in conjunction with other procedures that did not focus on the first pedal ray with the exception of harvesting autogenous ipsilateral calcaneal bone graft

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, PC

Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49525, United States

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Bednarz PA, Manoli A 2nd. Modified lapidus procedure for the treatment of hypermobile hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2000 Oct;21(10):816-21. doi: 10.1177/107110070002101004.

    PMID: 11128011BACKGROUND
  • Clark HR, Veith RG, Hansen ST Jr. Adolescent bunions treated by the modified Lapidus procedure. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst. 1987 Fall;47(2):109-22.

    PMID: 2825872BACKGROUND
  • Saxena A, Nguyen A, Nelsen E. Lapidus bunionectomy: Early evaluation of crossed lag screws versus locking plate with plantar lag screw. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009 Mar-Apr;48(2):170-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2008.12.009.

    PMID: 19232969BACKGROUND
  • Rutherford RL. The Lapidus procedure for primus metatarsus adductus. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1974 Aug;64(8):581-4. doi: 10.7547/87507315-64-8-581. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4845803BACKGROUND
  • McInnes BD, Bouche RT. Critical evaluation of the modified Lapidus procedure. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2001 Mar-Apr;40(2):71-90. doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(01)80048-x.

    PMID: 11324674BACKGROUND
  • Bacardi BE, Boysen TJ. Considerations for the Lapidus operation. J Foot Surg. 1986 Mar-Apr;25(2):133-8.

    PMID: 3711593BACKGROUND
  • Christenson C, Jones RO, Basque M, Mollohan E. Comparison of oblique closing base wedge osteotomies of the first metatarsal: stripping versus nonstripping of the periosteum. J Foot Surg. 1991 Mar-Apr;30(2):107-13.

    PMID: 1865058BACKGROUND
  • Hansen ST Jr. Hallux valgus surgery. Morton and Lapidus were right! Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1996 Jul;13(3):347-54.

    PMID: 8829031BACKGROUND
  • Mendicino R, Catanzariti AR, Hofbauer M, Saltrick KR. The modified lapidus arthrodesis: technical maneuvers and pearls. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000 Jul-Aug;39(4):258-64. doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(00)80010-1. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10949807BACKGROUND
  • LAPIDUS PW. The author's bunion operation from 1931 to 1959. Clin Orthop. 1960;16:119-35. No abstract available.

  • Sangeorzan BJ, Hansen ST Jr. Modified Lapidus procedure for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle. 1989 Jun;9(6):262-6. doi: 10.1177/107110078900900602.

  • Myerson M, Allon S, McGarvey W. Metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis for management of hallux valgus and metatarsus primus varus. Foot Ankle. 1992 Mar-Apr;13(3):107-15. doi: 10.1177/107110079201300301.

  • Hernandez A, Hernandez PA, Hernandez WA. Lapidus: when and why? Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1989 Jan;6(1):197-208.

  • Catanzariti AR, Mendicino RW, Lee MS, Gallina MR. The modified Lapidus arthrodesis: a retrospective analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1999 Sep-Oct;38(5):322-32. doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(99)80003-9.

  • Myerson MS, Badekas A. Hypermobility of the first ray. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000 Sep;5(3):469-84.

  • Ray RG. First metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis: technical considerations and technique modification. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2002 Jul-Aug;41(4):260-72. doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(02)80025-4.

  • Kopp FJ, Patel MM, Levine DS, Deland JT. The modified Lapidus procedure for hallux valgus: a clinical and radiographic analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Nov;26(11):913-7. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601103.

  • Coetzee JC, Resig SG, Kuskowski M, Saleh KJ. The Lapidus procedure as salvage after failed surgical treatment of hallux valgus. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Mar;86-A Suppl 1:30-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200403001-00005.

  • Saffo G, Wooster MF, Stevens M, Desnoyers R, Catanzariti AR. First metatarsocuneiform joint arthrodesis: a five-year retrospective analysis. J Foot Surg. 1989 Sep-Oct;28(5):459-65.

  • Gutteck N, Wohlrab D, Zeh A, Radetzki F, Delank KS, Lebek S. Immediate fullweightbearing after tarsometatarsal arthrodesis for hallux valgus correction--Does it increase the complication rate? Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Sep;21(3):198-201. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

  • Goldstein CL, Schemitsch E, Bhandari M, Mathew G, Petrisor BA. Comparison of different outcome instruments following foot and ankle trauma. Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Dec;31(12):1075-80. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.1075.

  • Prissel MA, Hyer CF, Grambart ST, Bussewitz BW, Brigido SA, DiDomenico LA, Lee MS, Reeves CL, Shane AM, Tucker DJ, Weinraub GM. A Multicenter, Retrospective Study of Early Weightbearing for Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Mar-Apr;55(2):226-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.09.003. Epub 2016 Jan 5.

  • King CM, Richey J, Patel S, Collman DR. Modified lapidus arthrodesis with crossed screw fixation: early weightbearing in 136 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;54(1):69-75. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.09.034. Epub 2014 Oct 31.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hallux Valgus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Foot DeformitiesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Patients were blinded to treatment until their 2 week post-operative visit.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Orthopaedic Surgeon - Foot and Ankle

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2019

First Posted

January 23, 2019

Study Start

January 20, 2012

Primary Completion

July 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

January 31, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations